Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 11, Number 6—June 2005
Research

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci in Rural Communities, Western United States

Kurt B. Stevenson*†Comments to Author , Katy Searle†, Gregory Stoddard†, and Matthew H. Samore†‡
Author affiliations: *Qualis Health, Boise, Idaho, USA; †University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA; ‡VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

Main Article

Table 4

Comparison of MRSA cases with resistant and susceptible phenotypes*

No (%)
Resistant group†, N = 142 Susceptible group‡, N = 32 p value§
Skin and soft tissue 74 (52) 26 (81) 0.003
Urine 15 (11) 0 (0) NS
Blood 9 (6) 1 (3) NS
Sputum 30 (21) 1 (3) 0.019
Other source 14 (10) 4 (13) NS
Community-associated 38 (27) 24 (75) <0.0001
Sex
Male 79 (56) 17 (53)
Female 63 (44) 15 (47)
Mean age (y) 69 32 0.0001
Age >65 y 89 (63) 3 (9) <0.0001
Diabetes mellitus 38 (27) 1 (3) 0.002
Renal failure 13 (9) 0 (0) NS
Prior antimicrobial therapy 61 (43) 6 (19) 0.015
Immunosuppression 14 (10) 0 (0) NS

*MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; NS, not significant.
†MRSA isolates resistant to both clindamycin and ciprofloxacin.
‡MRSA isolates susceptible to both clindamycin and ciprofloxacin.
§Based on Fisher exact test. Comparison of age tested by Kruskal-Wallis equality of populations rank test.

Main Article

Page created: April 24, 2012
Page updated: April 24, 2012
Page reviewed: April 24, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external