Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 14, Number 5—May 2008
Dispatch

Rickettsia slovaca in Dermacentor marginatus and Tick-borne Lymphadenopathy, Tuscany, Italy

Author affiliations: *Osservatorio Permanente per Patologie a Trasmissione Vettoriale, Lucca, Italy; †Università degli Studi di Torino, Grugliasco, Italy;

Cite This Article

Abstract

Of 263 patients in Tuscany, Italy, from whom ticks were removed during July 2005–May 2007, five showed signs of tick-borne encephalopathy. Of the ticks, 17 were Dermacentor marginatus; 6 (35.3%) of these were identified by sequence analysis as containing Rickettsia slovaca. Tick-borne lympadenopathy occurs in this area.

Rickettsia slovaca was first isolated in Czechoslovakia from the tick vector Dermacentor marginatus in 1968 (1) and was subsequently detected in several European countries. It was recognized as the causative agent of tick-borne lymphadenopathy (24) and Dermacentor spp.–borne necrosis-erythema-lymphadenopathy (5). Typical clinical signs of infection include skin lesions at the tick bite site and regional, often painful, lymphadenopathy (2,3). Acute disease can be followed by residual alopecia at the bite site (2). This disease is considered a mild rickettsiosis, but severe symptoms have been described, especially in untreated patients (2).

D. marginatus is the only member of the species Dermacentor reported in Italy; it is widely distributed in prairies and steppes up to 2,500 m above sea level, including the northern Apennines (6). Adults are active within a temperature range of 4°C to 16°C (7,8). Temperature influences the seasonality of tick-borne lymphadenopathy, which has a higher incidence during cold months (4,9). We describe results from a tick-borne zoonoses surveillance system that was implemented in 2002 at the Lucca local health unit (ASL 2) in Tuscany, Italy.

The Study

Patients admitted to emergency units in Tuscany, Italy, for tick removal were followed up for 40 days. Epidemiologic and clinical data were collected for each patient by using a standardized questionnaire. History of allergic reactions or hypersensitivity to tick bites was considered and evaluated to avoid mistakes in case definition.

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Distribution of tick-borne lymphadenopathy cases in Tuscany, Italy. Circles indicate cases, squares indicate patients bitten by Dermacentor marginatus who were not classified as case-patients, and triangles indicate emergency units. Negative (white symbols) and positive (dark symbols) PCR results for spotted fever group rickettsiae are indicated.

Figure 1. Distribution of tick-borne lymphadenopathy cases in Tuscany, Italy. Circles indicate cases, squares indicate patients bitten by Dermacentor marginatus who were not classified as case-patients, and triangles indicate emergency units. Negative (white...

Ticks were classified by using standard identification keys (8) and stored in 70% ethanol until DNA extraction. D. marginatus females were measured, and the degree of engorgement (tick engorgement index [TEI]) was visually estimated. Ticks were ranked by 3 TEI levels: 1 = completely unengorged, 2 = intermediate (idiosoma length ≈2× scutum width), and 3 = engorged (idiosoma length >2× scutum width). Association between TEI levels and occurrence of clinical symptoms was evaluated by using the Fisher exact test. All statistical analyses were conducted by using R statistical software (10). Arcview 3.3 (Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc., Redlands, CA, USA) was used to map the geographic distribution of cases in the study area (Figure 1).

For pathogen detection by PCR, ticks were individually homogenized with a pestle in microcentrifuge tubes and DNA was extracted with the DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). Negative controls (distilled water) were used to check for contamination of samples during this phase. Success of DNA extraction was verified by using PCR for tick mitochondrial 16S rDNA (11). Two PCR assays, targeting citrate synthase A (gtlA) and outer membrane protein A (ompA) genes, were used to identify spotted fever group rickettsiae as described (12).

Cases of abnormal tickbite reaction were observed only in patients bitten by D. marginatus (Table 1). From July 2005 through May 2007, information on 263 patients was recorded in the surveillance system. Removed ticks were classified as Ixodes ricinus (n = 187), Rhipicephalus sanguineus (n = 6), or D. marginatus (n = 17); 53 were unclassified (lost or disrupted).

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Enlarged lymph nodes (A), tache noire (arrowhead) (B), and alopecia (C) in patients admitted to the Lucca local health unit, Tuscany, Italy.

Figure 2. Enlarged lymph nodes (A), tache noire (arrowhead) (B), and alopecia (C) in patients admitted to the Lucca local health unit, Tuscany, Italy.

Five patients (29.4%) (2 adults and 3 children) showed clinical signs typically related to tick-borne lymphadenopathy. We defined tick-borne lymphadenopathy case-patients as those with skin lesion (eschar) at the tick bite site and regional lymphadenopathy (2). The 5 patients were examined by physicians at least twice. Each patient had enlarged lymph nodes (Figure 2 , panel A) at the second examination. Crusted scalp lesions (Figure 2, panel B) ranged in diameter from 8 mm to 25 mm. One patient was surgically treated to remove necrotic tissue from a large tache noire; he showed alopecia >8 months after acute episode (Figure 2, panel C). Three cases were recorded in spring, 1 in autumn, and 1 in winter (Table 2). Association between Dermacentor TEIs and occurrence of symptoms was not statistically significant (p = 0.13). Six (35.3%) of 17 ticks were positive by PCR for either gtlA or ompA. The ompA gene sequences of all positive samples showed similarity of 100% with the R. slovaca (GenBank accession no. U43808).

Conclusions

Until recently, Mediterranean spotted fever (MSF) caused by R. conorii and transmitted by the brown dog tick, R. sanguineus, was considered the only tick-borne rickettsiosis in Italy. Local investigations at ASL 2 showed a decrease in MSF incidence during the past 10 years and fewer Rhipicephalus spp. bites than Ixodes spp. and Dermacentor spp. bites. In the past 2 years, no MSF was officially recorded at ASL 2, and our results suggest an emerging role of R. slovaca as a tick-borne pathogen in the area.

Most bitten patients showed specific clinical manifestations (fever, itching, rash, weariness, and myalgia) and 5 (29.4%) had typical signs of tick-borne lymphadenopathy. Pathogen identification in ticks agreed with the case definition in 50% of cases. Infected ticks were removed from 3 patients not considered to have lymphadenopathy; 1 patient showed no symptoms, probably because the tick was not attached long enough to enable pathogen transmission (TEI = 1).

A study reported that children and women have a higher risk than men for infection caused by R. slovaca (4); all of our patients with tick-borne lymphadenopathy were children or women. This result reflects the higher risk for bite by Dermacentor spp.; 6 (35.3%) of the 17 patients were <10 years of age and 10 (58.8%) were female.

Raoult et al. reported that all cases of tick-borne lymphadenopathy cases recorded in their study were found from October through May (4), confirming the seasonal incidence of tick-borne lymphadenopathy in cold months (2). The activity of D. marginatus adults in cold months has been reported (7,8). Our results confirm this trend, although the absence of cases of tick-borne lymphadenopathy in winter can be explained by the lower human frequency of high-risk areas (Table 2).

Cases reported in this study were concentrated in the northern part of ASL 2, despite the lower population density (Figure 1). Local investigations showed that wild boars, which seem to be important in the epidemiology of R. slovaca (13), are found in this area. In the northern part of this area, woodland habitat and human habits increase the risk for human contact with vectors. TEI did not show any association with cases but study of feeding duration is so far strictly applied to the transmission of Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. by I. ricinus (14).

In recent years, many efforts have been made to characterize distinct tick-borne diseases. A diagnostic approach that includes surveillance of patient symptoms and vectors can be helpful in identifying cases of tick-borne lymphadenopathy (15). Tick identification is also important in diagnosis (4).

Our data indicate a high prevalence of R. slovaca in D. marginatus collected from patients. On the basis of these results, all patients bitten by D. marginatus should be observed to determine whether specific treatments are required. The new surveillance system in Lucca will provide real-time data that will be useful for evaluation of patient health problems.

Dr Selmi is the head of the Permanent Observatory of Tick-borne Diseases at the Lucca local health unit in Tuscany, Italy. His primary research interests include emerging pathogens and epidemiology of tick-borne diseases.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank 3 anonymous reviewers for improving this article.

This study was supported by the Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Lucca.

Top

References

  1. Rehacek  J. Rickettsia slovaca, the organism and its ecology. Acta Scientifica National Academy Scientifica Bohemoslovacae Brno. 1984;18:150.
  2. Lakos  A. Tick-borne lymphadenopathy (TIBOLA). Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2002;114:64854.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Lakos  A. Tick-borne lymphadenopathy—a new rickettsial disease? Lancet. 1997;350:1006. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Raoult  D, Lakos  A, Fenollar  F, Beytout  J, Brouqui  P, Fournier  PE. Spotless rickettsiosis caused by Rickettsia slovaca and associated with Dermacentor ticks. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34:13316. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Oteo  JA, Ibarra  V, Blanco  JR, Martinez de Artola  V, Marquez  FJ, Portillo  A, Dermacentor-borne necrosis erythema and lymphadenopathy: clinical and epidemiological features of a new tick-borne disease. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004;10:32731. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Mannelli  A, Tolari  F, Pedri  P, Stefanelli  S. Spatial distribution and seasonality of ticks (Acarina: Ixodidae) in a protected area in the northern Apennines. Parassitologia. 1997;39:415.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Rukhkian  MI. Vertical migrations of hungry imagoes of the tick Dermacentor marginatus [in Russian]. Parazitologiia. 1987;21:6803.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Manilla  G. Acari, Ixodida (fauna d’Italia 36): Bologna (Italy): Edizioni Calderoni; 1998.
  9. Raoult  D, Weiller  PJ, Chagnon  A, Chaudet  H, Gallais  H, Casanova  P. Mediterranean spotted fever: clinical, laboratory and epidemiological features of 199 cases. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1986;35:84550.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. 2007 [cited 2008 Jan 31]. Available from http://www.R-project.org
  11. d’Oliveira  C, van der Weide  M, Jacquiet  P, Jongejan  F. Detection of Theileria annulata by the PCR in ticks (Acari:Ixodidae) collected from cattle in Mauritania. Exp Appl Acarol. 1997;21:27991. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Bertolotti  L, Tomassone  L, Tramuta  C, Grego  E, Amore  G, Ambrogi  C, Borrelia lusitaniae and spotted fever group rickettsiae in Ixodes ricinus (Acari: Ixodidae) in Tuscany, central Italy. J Med Entomol. 2006;43:15965. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ortuno  A, Quesada  M, Lopez-Claessens  S, Castella  J, Sanfeliu  I, Anton  E, The role of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in the eco-epidemiology of R. slovaca in northeastern Spain. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2007;7:5964. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gray  J, Stanek  G, Kundi  M, Kocianova  E. Dimensions of engorging Ixodes ricinus as a measure of feeding duration. Int J Med Microbiol. 2005;295:56772. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Brouqui  P, Bacellar  F, Baranton  G, Birtles  RJ, Bjoersdorff  A, Blanco  JR, Guidelines for the diagnosis of tick-borne bacterial diseases in Europe. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004;10:110832. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures
Tables

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1405.070976

1Current affiliation: European Food Safety Authority, Parma, Italy

Table of Contents – Volume 14, Number 5—May 2008

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Marco Selmi, Osservatorio Permanente per Patologie a Trasmissione Vettoriale, 2 Lucca Via di Tiglio, Capannori, Lucca, Italy;

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: July 08, 2010
Page updated: July 08, 2010
Page reviewed: July 08, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external