Skip directly to local search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to navigation Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options
CDC Home

Volume 16, Number 12—December 2010

Dispatch

Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Outbreak at Canadian Forces Cadet Camp

Rhonda Y. KroppComments to Author , Laura E. Bogaert, Robert Barber, Francois-William Tremblay, Robert Ennis, Martin Tepper, Robert Pless, Nathalie Bastien, Yan Li, Carole Beaudoin, James Anderson, Louise Pelletier, and Rachel Rodin
Author affiliations: Author affiliations: Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (R.Y. Kropp, F-W. Tremblay, R. Pless, L. Pelletier, R. Rodin); Department of National Defence Headquarters, Ottawa (L.E. Bogaert, R. Barber, R. Ennis, M. Tepper, J. Anderson); Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada (N. Bastien, Y. Li, C. Beaudoin)

Suggested citation for this article

Abstract

We conducted a case–control study to describe the clinical and epidemiologic characteristics of an outbreak of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 at a Canadian military cadet training center. We found that asthma and obesity confer greater risk for infection. Viral shedding was detected by PCR up to 18 days after symptom onset.

On July 29, 2009, the Public Health Agency of Canada was notified of an outbreak of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 at the Army Cadet Summer Training Centre Argonaut at Canadian Forces Base, Gagetown, New Brunswick. The Cadet Summer Training Centre camp opened in early July and ran sessions lasting 2–6 weeks. The camp setting was semiclosed, with limited movement on and off camp. A case–control study was conducted to describe transmission, clinical characteristics, viral shedding, and risk factors for infection.

The Study

Approximately 506 cadets, 12–18 years of age, and 322 staff cadets, officers, and support staff lived on camp premises. All persons at the camp were invited to participate. This study received expedited approval from the Health Canada Research Ethics Board. Participants were interviewed in person at the camp or by telephone; swab specimens were collected by on-site nurses. Samples were sent to the National Microbiology Laboratory for testing using reverse transcription–PCR and primer sets developed by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (1). Specimens were cultured in primary CMK cells (Viromed Laboratories, Inc., Minnetonka, MN, USA) and the hemagglutinin titer was checked at days 6 and 10.

A modified case definition for pandemic (H1N1) 2009 infection was developed based on Canada’s surveillance case definition for influenza-like illness. Symptom onset was defined as earliest date of onset of self-reported history of fever or cough. The case definition is outlined in Table 1.

During August 3–27, 2009, we conducted 144 face-to-face and 21 phone interviews. Approximately 20% of cadets and 20% of staff cadets, officers, and support staff participated. Of the 165 participants, 56 were classified as confirmed cases, 24 as suspected cases, and 85 as controls. Participant age ranged from 13 to 43 years of age; 88% were 13–18 years, and 55% were male. No statistically significant demographic differences (p<0.05) were observed between confirmed cases, suspected cases, or controls.

Figure

Thumbnail of Epidemic curve of 54 confirmed and 21 suspected cases of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 infection and of 27 additional cases of fever and cough identified by the camp Health Care Centre, Army Cadet Summer Training Centre Argonaut at Canadian Forces Base, Gagetown, New Brunswick, Canada, 2009.

Figure. Epidemic curve of 54 confirmed and 21 suspected cases of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 infection and of 27 additional cases of fever and cough identified by the camp Health Care Centre, Army...

The epidemic curve (Figure) summarizes the outbreak among those with known symptom onset date for cases (n = 54), suspected cases (n = 21), and 27 additional cases of fever and cough identified by the camp Health Care Centre (HCC) but not included in the study. The minimum camp attack rate for cases/suspected cases and HCC cases not in the study was 13.5% (112/828), 14.0% among cadets (71/506) and 12.7% among staff cadets and officers (41/322).

The outbreak was identified on July 17. In response, respiratory etiquette and hand hygiene were emphasized; camp residents were encouraged to seek care if ill. Those having fever and cough were isolated for 7 days, until parents came, or until laboratory results returned negative. Group outdoor activities stopped on July 23; all group activities were cancelled as of July 25. Some cadets were fast-tracked to graduate early, and arrival of new cadets was delayed 2 weeks. Mass screening for fever and cough was undertaken on August 6, before the arrival of new cadets; all new cadets were screened on arrival.

No activity or exposure was linked to increased risk for illness (data not shown). All but 1 person with a suspected or confirmed case reported symptoms; 58/85 (68.2%) of controls also reported symptoms during the outbreak period. Odds of experiencing shortness of breath, chest pain, sputum production, vomiting, rhinorrhea, nose bleeds, or change in level of awareness were all >5× higher for those with cases/suspected cases than for controls (Table 2). The mean number of symptoms among those with symptomatic cases/suspected cases was greater than among symptomatic controls (8.7 vs. 3.4; p<0.001). This relationship held true when comparing those with cases/suspected cases with symptomatic controls who had negative PCR results.

Of the 78 persons with symptomatic/suspected cases for whom complete information was available, 25 (32.1%) had recovered by the interview; median symptom duration was 7 and 9 days, respectively. Symptom duration >10 days was reported by 40% of persons with cases/suspected cases whose symptoms had resolved and 47% of those with unresolved symptoms. Median time from symptom onset to illness peak was 2 days (range 1–14 days). With the exception of cough, sputum production, and malaise, symptoms peaked rapidly (24–48 hours) after onset.

Overall, 86.1% of persons with cases/suspected cases accessed the HCC; none were hospitalized. Oseltamivir was given to 2 persons with confirmed cases who had comorbid conditions (asthma and kidney disease). Forty-four persons with cases/suspected cases (55.7%) were not isolated because they did not seek treatment at the HCC or not while both fever and cough were present.

Eight persons had positive PCR results for pandemic (H1N1) 2009 7–18 days after symptom onset, and live virus was detected up to 14 days after symptom onset. All but 1 of these persons were capable of transmitting virus given upper respiratory symptoms, and 2 reported diarrhea and vomiting on the day the swab sample was obtained. Four persons had live virus detected after day 7 of illness (up to 14 days); 2 of these reported comorbid conditions.

Persons with confirmed and suspected cases did not differ with regard to comorbidity or risk factors, except for seasonal influenza vaccination; 6/48 (12.5%) of persons with confirmed cases reported having received the seasonal influenza vaccine in the year of the study versus 8/22 (36.4%) of those with suspected cases (odds ratio 4.0; p<0.05). No difference was found in the proportion of those with cases/suspected cases and controls reporting seasonal influenza vaccination during the current year or past 2 years.

The odds of reporting >1 comorbidity was >2.7× higher for persons with cases/suspected cases than for controls (p<0.05) and for asthma >3.9× higher (p < 0.05). The odds of being obese were >3× higher for persons with case/suspected cases (odds ratio 3.4, 95% confidence interval 1.0–10.9).

Conclusions

In accordance with national recommendations (2), antiviral drugs were not used for control; transmission appeared to be reduced through nonpharmaceutical measures. Multiple index cases could not be ruled out. No individual activity or exposure was linked to increased risk for illness.

High rates of obesity have been noted among hospitalized patients with pandemic (H1N1) 2009 (36). This study suggests obesity is a risk factor for infection or clinical illness and given low prevalence of comorbid conditions may stand alone as a risk factor. Consistent with international studies (7), vaccination for seasonal influenza was neither protective nor a risk factor for acquiring pandemic (H1N1) 2009. One third of case-patients reported change in level of awareness, which suggests the potential for mild neurologic sequelae. Neurologic complications of influenza infection have been reported in hospitalized children (8,9).

Seven of 8 participants who had positive PCR results for pandemic (H1N1) 2009 >7 days after symptom onset were capable of transmitting virus, given their upper respiratory symptoms on the day the swab sample was obtained. Studies of seasonal influenza indicate median viral shedding of 7–8 days after illness onset, with titers low or undetectable by day 5, although prolonged shedding has been reported (1013). In this study, test results for pandemic (H1N1) 2009 were positive by culture up to 14 days and by PCR up to 18 days after symptom onset. This and other studies describe longer shedding periods for pandemic (H1N1) 2009 as compared with seasonal influenza (10,1315).

Study limitations should be acknowledged. The case definition included self-reported fever and cough. Therefore, misclassification of persons with illnesses other than pandemic (H1N1) 2009 may have occurred. Convenience sampling was used so participants may differ from nonparticipants; complete demographics for the camp were not available for comparison. A small proportion of phone interviews were conducted <6 weeks after symptom onset, raising the possibility of recall bias.

Infection control procedures likely contributed to the control of transmission in the absence of antiviral drug use or early treatment for contacts. Shedding in otherwise healthy adolescents and young adults may be longer than shedding of seasonal influenza viruses, which may have implications for public health planning.

At the time this work was conducted, Ms Kropp was an epidemiologist and policy advisor with the Public Health Agency of Canada. Currently, she is the director of the Travel Health Division in the same agency. Her research interests include the epidemiology, prevention, and control of infectious diseases.

Acknowledgments

We thank everyone at the Argonaut cadet camp for their invaluable assistance and support on site. Specifically, we thank Kenneth M. Fells for welcoming and supporting the team at the camp and Barbara Butler and Peggy Fry and the nursing staff at the HCC for their unwavering support throughout data collection. This study would not have been possible without their support and assistance.

This study was a collaboration between representatives from the Public Health Agency of Canada and the Department of National Defence, Canadian Forces Health Services Group Headquarters. Funding for this study was provided by the Public Health Agency of Canada.

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC realtime RTPCR (rRTPCR) protocol for detection and characterization of swine influenza (version 2009) [cited 2010 Feb 15]. http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/swineflu/CDCRealtimeRTPCR_SwineH1Assay-2009_20090430.pdf
  2. Public Health Agency of Canada. Use of antivirals to treat H1N1 flu virus [cited 2010 Feb 15]. http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/alert-alerte/h1n1/antiviral-antiviraux05-01-eng.php
  3. Rothberg MB, Haessler SD. Complications of seasonal and pandemic influenza. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(Suppl):e917. DOIPubMed
  4. Kumar A, Zarychanski R, Pinto R, Cook DJ, Marshall J, LaCroix J, Critically ill patients with 2009 influenza A (H1N1) infection in Canada. AMA. 2009;302:18729. Epub 2009 Oct 12. DOIPubMed
  5. Jain S, Kamimoto L, Bramley AM, Schmitz AM, Benoit SR, Louie J, Hospitalized patients with 2009 H1N1 influenza in the United States April–June 2009. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:193544. DOIPubMed
  6. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Intensive-care patients with severe novel influenza A (H1N1) virus infection—Michigan, June 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009;58:74952.PubMed
  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Effectiveness of 2008–09 trivalent influenza vaccine against 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1)—United States, May–June 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009;58:12415.PubMed
  8. Maricich SM, Neul JL, Lotze TE, Cazacu AC, Uyeki TM, Demmler GJ, Neurologic complications associated with influenza A in children during the 2003–2004 influenza season in Houston, Texas. Pediatrics. 2004;114:e62633. DOIPubMed
  9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Neurologic complications associated with novel influenza A (H1N1) virus infection in children—Dallas, Texas, May 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009;58:7738.PubMed
  10. World Health Organization Writing Group. Nonpharmaceutical interventions for pandemic influenza, international measures. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:817.PubMed
  11. Kiso M, Mitamura K, Sakai-Tagawa Y, Shiraishi K, Kawakami C, Kimura K, Resistant influenza A viruses in children treated with oseltamivir: descriptive study. Lancet. 2004;364:75965. DOIPubMed
  12. Klimov AI, Rocha E, Hayden FG, Shult PA, Roumillat LF, Cox NJ. Prolonged shedding of amantadine-resistant influenza A viruses by immunodeficient patients: detection by polymerase chain reaction-restriction analysis. J Infect Dis. 1995;172:13525. DOIPubMed
  13. Lee N, Chan PKS, Hui DSC, Rainer TH, Wong E, Choi KW, Viral loads and duration of viral shedding in adult patients hospitalized with influenza. JID. 2009;200:492500. DOIPubMed
  14. Witkop C, Duffy MR, Macias EA, Gibbons TF, Escobar JD, Burwell KN, Novel influenza A (H1N1) outbreak at the US Air Force Academy: epidemiology and viral shedding duration. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38:1216. DOIPubMed
  15. Cao B, Li XW, Mao Y, Wang J, Lu HZ, Chen YS, Clinical features of initial cases of 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus infection in China. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:250717. DOIPubMed

Figure

Tables

Suggested citation for this article: Kropp RY, Bogaert LE, Barber R, Tremblay F-W, Ennis R, Tepper M, et al. Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 outbreak at Canadian forces cadet camp. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet]. 2010 Dec [date cited]. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1612.100451

DOI: 10.3201/eid1612.100451

Top of Page

Table of Contents – Volume 16, Number 12—December 2010

Comments to the Authors

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Rhonda Y. Kropp, Travel Health, Public Health Agency of Canada, 130 Colonnade Rd, Rm 396B, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0K9, Canada





characters(s) remaining.

Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.

Comments to the EID Editors

Please contact the EID Editors via our Contact Form.

 

Past Issues

Select a Past Issue:

Art in Science - Selections from Emerging Infectious Diseases
Now available for order



CDC 24/7 – Saving Lives, Protecting People, Saving Money. Learn More About How CDC Works For You…

USA.gov: The U.S. Government's Official Web PortalDepartment of Health and Human Services
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention   1600 Clifton Rd. Atlanta, GA 30333, USA
800-CDC-INFO (800-232-4636) TTY: (888) 232-6348 - Contact CDC–INFO