Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 17, Number 10—October 2011
Letter

Granulicatella adiacens and Early-Onset Sepsis in Neonate

On This Page
Figures
Article Metrics
14
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus

Cite This Article

To the Editor: Granulicatella and Abiotrophia, formerly known as nutritionally variant streptococci, are normal flora of the human upper respiratory, gastrointestinal, and urogenital tracts (1). G. adiacens has been associated with bacteremia and endovascular, central nervous system, ocular, oral, bone and joint, and genitourinary infections (14).

Although streptococci are a frequent cause of early-onset sepsis in newborns, non–group B or D streptococci comprise only ≈1% of cases of early-onset neonatal sepsis; the condition is primarily associated with viridans streptococci (5). This report describes a male infant with early-onset sepsis caused by G. adiacens. Molecular genetic studies identified the same organism in flora isolated from the maternal cervix, which suggests vertical transmission.

After 36 weeks’ gestation, a male infant, weighing 2,850 g, was born by repeat caesarean section to a 37-year-old woman who was negative for group B streptococcus; she began labor without rupture of membranes. Apgar scores were 9 and 9 at 1 and 5 minutes, respectively. Respiratory distress developed in the infant within an hour of birth. Peripheral blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were obtained, and intravenous ampicillin (150 mg/kg every 12 h) and gentamicin (4 mg/kg every 24 h) were administered. Leukocyte count was 27,000/mm3 with 79% polymorphonuclear leukocytes and 2% band forms; platelet count was 223,000/mm3. CSF cell counts were 3 leukocytes/mm3 and 18 erythrocytes/mm3.

Respiratory distress progressed rapidly, and at 20 hours of life, mechanical ventilation was instituted. Chest radiograph demonstrated diffuse, bilateral interstitial infiltrates consistent with pneumonia. Persistent pulmonary hypertension was diagnosed by echocardiography. Peripheral blood culture yielded G. adiacens (API 20 STREP, bioMérieux Clinical Diagnostics, Durham, NC, USA) that was sensitive to vancomycin. Repeat blood samples were obtained before and after antimicrobial drug treatment was changed to vancomycin, 10 mg/kg every 12 h, and gentamicin, 4 mg/kg every 24 h. CSF culture and repeat blood cultures had no growth. Vancomycin and gentamicin were administered for 14 days. The patient eventually recovered and was discharged after 25 days of hospitalization. The biochemical identification of G. adiacens in the blood culture was confirmed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

Figure

Thumbnail of PCR amplification of Granulicatella adiacens DNA. DNA was prepared from the bacteria indicated, PCR-amplified with G. adiacens–specific primers, and subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis with ethidium bromide staining and ultraviolet light visualization. Lane 1, water, negative control; lane 2, G. adiacens–positive control, ATCC 49175; lane 3, DH5α Escherichia coli–negative control (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) 18263–012; lane 4, Enterobacter sakazakii–negative control, ATCC BA

Figure. PCR amplification of Granulicatella adiacens DNA. DNA was prepared from the bacteria indicated, PCR-amplified with G. adiacens–specific primers, and subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis with ethidium bromide staining and ultraviolet light...

Cervical samples for culturing were obtained from the mother 4 days after delivery. After samples were plated on blood and chocolate agar, colonies were harvested from the primary plates, and pooled bacterial DNA was isolated for further analyses. A primer pair was designed to amplify a 422-bp fragment unique to G. adiacens. These primers (sense, 5′-GGTTTATCCTTAGAAAGGAGGT-3′, and antisense, 5′-GAGCATTCGGTTGGGCACTCTAG-3′) were used to amplify G. adiacens from DNA prepared from the bacterial pools isolated from maternal cervix and, as control, from DNA prepared from the infant’s blood culture isolate. DNA amplicons underwent agarose gel electrophoresis with ethidium bromide staining and were visualized under ultraviolet light. PCR amplification showed DNA amplicons for the patient’s blood culture, his mother’s cervical swab sample, and a positive control but not for negative controls (Figure). Capillary nucleotide DNA sequence analysis confirmed all 3 amplicons as G. adiacens (not shown).

Nutritionally variant streptococci have been difficult to identify because they have unique culture requirements, they exhibit pleomorphic phenotypic features (1), and they demonstrate satellitism around colonies of other bacteria. This has led to misidentification or nonidentification by using commercially available phenotypic testing, prompting the recommendation that 16S rRNA gene sequencing be used for G. adiacens identification (6).

The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute does not recommend disk diffusion testing to determine the susceptibility of G. adiacens to antimicrobial drugs and suggests broth microdilution MIC testing in cation-adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth with 2.5%–5% lysed horse blood and 0.001% pyridoxine hydrochloride (7,8). Under these conditions, 55% of G. adiacens isolates were susceptible to penicillin, 63% were susceptible to ceftriaxone, 96% were susceptible to meropenem, and 100% were susceptible to vancomycin (4). A more recent report indicates that the resistance of G. adiacens to β-lactam and macrolide antimicrobial drugs may be increasing (3).

Treatment of G. adiacens infection may be difficult. In vitro antimicrobial drug susceptibility patterns do not correlate well with clinical response to treatment, and G. adiacens infections often respond poorly to antimicrobial drug treatment. Higher rates of bacteriologic failure and relapse rates after treatment have been observed for G. adiacens infection than for infections with streptococci and other related genera (9). G. adiacens endocarditis has been associated with a more severe clinical course than endocarditis caused by enterococci or viridans group streptococci, with higher rates of illness and death. On the basis of studies demonstrating synergy in vitro and in vivo, empiric combination therapy with vancomycin and an aminoglycoside has been suggested until susceptibility data are available (10), particularly when treating serious conditions such as endocarditis (3).

Reports have increased of serious infections caused by Granulicatella and Abiotrophia, including this report of early-onset neonatal sepsis due to G. adiacens. One recent study described 8 isolates associated with invasive infection in a 4-year period (3). Increased awareness and identification of G. adiacens are likely contributing to this increased recognition, with earlier cases not detected or diagnosed. 16S rRNA gene sequencing may facilitate or confirm Granulicatella and Abiotrophia spp. as the etiologic agents of infection.

Top

Matthew J. Bizzarro, Deborah A. Callan, Patricia A. Farrel, Louise-Marie Dembry, and Patrick G. GallagherComments to Author 
Author affiliations: Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA (M.J. Bizzarro, L.-M. Dembry, P.G. Gallagher); Yale–New Haven Hospital, New Haven (M.J. Bizzarro, D.A. Callan, P.A. Farrel, L.-M. Dembry, P.G. Gallagher)

Top

References

  1. Christensen  JJ, Facklam  RR. Granulicatella and Abiotrophia species from human clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:35203. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Gensheimer  WG, Reddy  SY, Mulconry  M, Greves  C. Abiotrophia/Granulicatella tubo-ovarian abscess in an adolescent virginal female. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2010;23:e912. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Zheng  X, Freeman  AF, Villafranca  J, Shortridge  D, Beyer  J, Kabat  W, Antimicrobial susceptibilities of invasive pediatric Abiotrophia and Granulicatella isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:43236. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Tuohy  MJ, Procop  GW, Washington  JA. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Abiotrophia adiacens and Abiotrophia defectiva. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2000;38:18991. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bizzarro  MJ, Raskind  C, Baltimore  RS, Gallagher  PG. Seventy-five years of neonatal sepsis at Yale: 1928–2003. Pediatrics. 2005;116:595602. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Woo  PC, Fung  AM, Lau  SK, Chan  BY, Chiu  SK, Teng  JL, Granulicatella adiacens and Abiotrophia defectiva bacteraemia characterized by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. J Med Microbiol. 2003;52:13740. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Jorgensen  JH, Hindler  JF. New consensus guidelines from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of infrequently isolated or fastidious bacteria. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44:2806. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for antimicrobial dilution and disk susceptibility testing of infrequently isolated or fastidious bacteria; approved guideline–second edition. 30: (M45–A2). Wayne (PA): The Institute; 2010.
  9. Stein  DS, Nelson  KE. Endocarditis due to nutritionally deficient streptococci: therapeutic dilemma. Rev Infect Dis. 1987;9:90816. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bouvet  A. Human endocarditis due to nutritionally variant streptococci: Streptococcus adjacens and Streptococcus defectivus. Eur Heart J. 1995;16(Suppl B):247.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figure

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1710.101967

Related Links

Top

Table of Contents – Volume 17, Number 10—October 2011

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Patrick G. Gallagher, Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, PO Box 208064, New Haven, CT 06520-8064, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: September 27, 2011
Page updated: September 27, 2011
Page reviewed: September 27, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external