Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

Volume 17, Number 11—November 2011

Research

Group A Streptococcus emm Gene Types in Pharyngeal Isolates, Ontario, Canada, 2002–2010

Patrick R. Shea, Amy L. Ewbank, Javier H. Gonzalez-Lugo, Alexandro J. Martagon-Rosado, Juan C. Martinez-Gutierrez, Hina A. Rehman, Monica Serrano-Gonzalez, Nahuel Fittipaldi, Stephen B. Beres, Anthony R. Flores, Donald E. Low, Barbara M. Willey, and James M. MusserComments to Author 
Author affiliations: The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, Houston, Texas, USA (P.R. Shea, A.L. Ewbank, J.H. Gonzalez-Lugo, A.J. Martagon-Rosado, J.C. Martinez-Gutierrez, H.A. Rehman, M. Serrano-Gonzalez, N. Fittipaldi, S.B. Beres, A.R. Flores, J.M. Musser); Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston (A.R. Flores); Baylor College of Medicine, Houston (A.R. Flores); Mount Sinai Hospital/University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (D.E. Low, B.M. Willey); Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion, Toronto (D.E. Low); University of Toronto, Toronto (D.E. Low)

Suggested citation for this article

Abstract

Group A Streptococcus (GAS) is a human-adapted pathogen that causes a variety of diseases, including pharyngitis and invasive infections. GAS strains are categorized by variation in the nucleotide sequence of the gene (emm) that encodes the M protein. To identify the emm types of GAS strains causing pharyngitis in Ontario, Canada, we sequenced the hypervariable region of the emm gene in 4,635 pharyngeal GAS isolates collected during 2002–2010. The most prevalent emm types varied little from year to year. In contrast, fine-scale geographic analysis identified inter-site variability in the most common emm types. Additionally, we observed fluctuations in yearly frequency of emm3 strains from pharyngitis patients that coincided with peaks of emm3 invasive infections. We also discovered a striking increase in frequency of emm89 strains among isolates from patients with pharyngitis and invasive disease. These findings about the epidemiology of GAS are potentially useful for vaccine research.

Group A Streptococcus (GAS) is a gram-positive bacterial pathogen responsible for ≈600 million cases of pharyngitis each year worldwide (1). The widespread prevalence of this disease results in considerable costs, estimated to exceed $200 million annually in the United States alone (2). In addition to acute pharyngitis, GAS causes several other human diseases, ranging from relatively mild to more severe, such as necrotizing fasciitis, soft tissue infections, glomerulonephritis, acute rheumatic fever, and streptococcal toxic shock syndrome. Thus, infections caused by GAS are a major public health concern in the United States and Canada and throughout the world.

GAS strains are classified mainly on the basis of variation in a cell-surface molecule known as M protein, encoded by the emm gene (3,4). M protein is a critical virulence factor and a major site of the human antibody response against GAS. M type–specific immunity develops in persons recovering from some GAS infections (5,6). As a result, the portion of the emm gene that encodes the amino-terminal 100 residues of M protein is under strong diversifying selection pressure, and this region is hypervariable in terms of GAS types (7). Currently, >120 distinct emm types of GAS are recognized.

Despite the considerable diversity of emm types of GAS isolates, epidemiologic studies have found that relatively few emm types tend to predominate within a local population; most isolates are composed of a small number of emm types (8,9). In distinct geographic areas, the predominant emm types often vary in frequency from year to year for reasons not fully understood. In addition, sizeable outbreaks can be caused by strains of a single emm type or of a small number of emm types. Overall, this combination of factors results in a complex epidemiologic situation for GAS pharyngitis.

Recently, vaccine candidates have been identified in an effort to reduce the prevalence of GAS disease and the number of human deaths it causes (10). Some of these experimental vaccines are based on the amino-terminus of M protein because of the type-specific immunity that may develop after GAS infection. A multivalent vaccine has been developed that exploits the amino-terminus of the M protein from many different emm types (11). In principle, the effectiveness of this type of M-protein vaccine may be highly dependent on how well the M proteins selected for the vaccine match the emm types of locally circulating strains. Thus, a more complete understanding of geographic and temporal variation in emm type may be useful for vaccine design. Furthermore, the emergence of new variants of known M types has been documented. Knowledge of the rate and patterns of emergence of distinct emm types and their alleles may be critical for understanding how GAS may “escape” the immune response generated by a vaccine based on the amino-terminus of M protein.

We investigated the distribution of GAS emm types causing pharyngitis in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, during 2002–2010. We also examined the temporal change in emm types in pharyngitis cases and compared this distribution with data from a comprehensive population-based study of GAS emm types that were causing invasive infections in Ontario. Finally, we studied the emm types causing pharyngitis in multiple geographic locations across the province of Ontario in 2009 and 2010.

Materials and Methods

Collection of Isolates

Isolates collected from throat specimens of patients with acute pharyngitis were identified as GAS from primary media by a variety of standard methods. These GAS isolates (hereafter also referred to as pharyngeal isolates) were collected from 2002 through 2010 from multiple Ontario laboratories. GAS isolates, stripped of patient identifiers, were forwarded to Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto for confirmation of identity and shipped to The Methodist Hospital Research Institute in Houston, Texas, for emm gene typing. Basic demographic information, including location where collected, age and sex of patient, and specimen collection date, was provided for isolates.

Toronto Isolates

During the summers (May through September) of 2002–2003 and 2006–2010, ≈500 consecutive isolates were collected each year from LifeLabs (formerly MDS), a large, centralized, commercial laboratory on the outskirts of Toronto. This facility primarily serves family medicine practices and outpatient clinics within the greater Toronto area but also acts as a catchment conduit from the surrounding region. The following number of isolates was obtained from this site per collection year: 523 (2002), 619 (2003), 502 (2006), 510 (2007), 522 (2008), 481 (2009), and 487 (2010). An additional ≈520 consecutive throat specimen GAS isolates from the Mount Sinai Hospital/University Health Network Clinical Microbiology Laboratory were collected during January 2008–March 2010.

Geographically Diverse Ontario Strains

Additional isolates from outlying locations of LifeLabs and Gamma Dynacare laboratory chains in London, Sudbury, and Thunder Bay, Ontario, each provided 100 consecutive GAS isolates per center during July–September 2009. The Gamma Dynacare Ottawa laboratory provided consecutive isolates up to 100 per month from July 2009 through July 2010, for a total 659 isolates. The Gamma Dynacare London branch provided 219 isolates from July through September 2009, and the distantly located North Bay and Elliot Lake branches together provided 36 GAS isolates from July through October 2009.

emm Type Assignment

GAS isolates were grown overnight at 37°C with 5% CO2 on trypticase soy agar plates containing 5% sheep blood (TSAII; Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Genomic DNA was obtained by boiling a sample obtained by streaking from multiple colonies in 0.05 mol/L NaOH for 2 min. The crude cell lysates were centrifuged for 2 min at 2,000 × g, and 2 μL of the lysate was used in PCRs. The hypervariable region of the emm gene that encodes the amino-terminus of M protein was amplified by PCR by using primers emm1 5′-TATT(C/G)GCTTAGAAAATTAA-3′ and emm2 5′-GCAAGTTCTTCAGCTTGTTT-3′. PCR products were purified by using 96-well ultrafiltration plates (EdgeBio, Gaithersburg, MD, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions; products were suspended in 100 μL distilled water. Cycle sequencing was performed with the Big Dye version 3.1 dye-terminator kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) by using primer emm1. Unincorporated fluorescent dye terminators were removed with 96-well gel-filtration cartridges (EdgeBio). Sequencing reactions were analyzed with a 3730xl DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems), and chromatograms were analyzed with Sequencher version 4.9 (GeneCodes, Ann Arbor, MI, USA). High quality sequences were trimmed to 220 nt in length and compared with reference sequences in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) emm database (ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/infectious_diseases/biotech/tsemm) by using the BLAST algorithm (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). Data analysis and graphing were performed with the GraphPad software package (Prism, La Jolla, CA, USA). The invasive index of each emm type was calculated by dividing its frequency in invasive infections by frequency in pharyngitis infections.

Results

Overview of Pharyngitis Strains

We determined the emm type for 4,635 GAS isolates that were causing acute pharyngitis in the province of Ontario during 2002–2010. Of these, 3,209 isolates were collected from the greater Toronto metropolitan region, and 1,426 isolates were obtained from 5 sites located throughout Ontario (London, Ottawa, North Bay/Elliot Lake, Sudbury, and Thunder Bay). The mean age of patients was 16.1 years (range 8 months to 105 years).

Distribution of emm Types in Toronto GAS Pharyngitis Strains

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Distribution of group A Streptococcus (GAS) emm types collected in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2002–2010. Thirty-four GAS emm types with <10 isolates each (≈0.3% of total) comprise the “other” category. Line graph showing cumulative percentage is superimposed with percentage scale shown on right.

Figure 1. Distribution of group A Streptococcus (GAS) emm types collected in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2002–2010. Thirty-four GAS emm types with <10 isolates each (≈0.3% of total) comprise the “other” category. Line graph...

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Annual frequency of emm89 isolates among patients with group A Streptococcus pharyngitis, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2002–2010.

Figure 2. Annual frequency of emm89 isolates among patients with group A Streptococcus pharyngitis, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 2002–2010.

Consistent with findings from previous surveys of GAS isolates that have caused pharyngitis in North America, Europe, and elsewhere (8,9,12), we found that a relatively small number of emm types dominated. For example, the 6 most prevalent emm types collected in Toronto during 2002–2010 were (in order of prevalence) emm12, emm1, emm4, emm28, emm2, and emm89 (Figure 1). These 6 emm types came from 68.9% of the pharyngeal isolates, whereas 29 emm types came from the remaining 31.1% of the isolates. Analysis of the annual change in emm type distribution indicated that, with few exceptions, these 6 types were consistently the most commonly collected. This finding suggests that the emm type population dynamic is relatively stable. However, emm89 strains were a key exception. The frequency of emm89 isolates increased 5-fold over the study period, increasing from 2.6% of isolates in 2002 to 14.7% in 2010 (Figure 2). In 2010, emm89 isolates were the second most common emm type among pharyngitis specimens in our sample. These data indicate a recent major expansion of type emm89 strains among isolates causing pharyngitis in Toronto.

Identification of New emm Alleles

We identified 20 allelic variants of 8 GAS emm types that had not been previously described: emm1 (4 alleles), emm3 (3 alleles), emm5 (3 alleles), emm6 (4 alleles), emm8 (1 allele), emm11 (2 alleles), emm12 (2 alleles), and st106M (1 allele). Nucleotide sequences for these alleles have been submitted to the CDC Streptococcus pyogenes emm sequence database (designations listed in Table 1). Seventeen of these alleles differed from the most closely related reference sequence by 1 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP); 2 allelic variants differed by 2 SNPs; and 1 isolate had a 6-bp in-frame insertion, resulting in the addition of 2 amino acid residues. Of the 21 SNPs identified, all but 1 resulted in a predicted amino acid substitution in the translated M-protein sequence. This excess of nonsynonymous mutations underscores the effect of the strong diversifying selection pressure acting on the emm gene.

Ontario emm Types in Relation to an Experimental 26-Valent GAS Vaccine

Overall, 18 of 57 emm types found in the Toronto pharyngeal isolates are represented in an experimental 26-valent GAS vaccine described elsewhere (11). These 18 emm types included 11 of the 12 most prevalent emm types that represent strains causing 78.5% of the pharyngitis cases we studied, a number similar to estimates for the US population (11). Notably, the single most commonly observed GAS emm type (emm4) not included in the 26-valent experimental vaccine was very common in Toronto. For example, during 2002–2010, emm4 was the third most common emm type causing pharyngitis, and in 2007 and 2008, it was the most common emm type. This finding is not entirely unexpected because emm4 has been one of the most common serotypes identified by other pharyngitis surveys (8,9,12,13).

Although a multivalent GAS vaccine based on the amino-terminus of M protein has theoretical promise, a potential concern is the detrimental effects of allelic variation on vaccine efficacy. Virtually all new and previously described emm alleles collected from pharyngitis patients in Toronto contained nucleotide changes that resulted in changes in amino acid sequence, with few alleles defined only by silent nuclear polymorphisms. New emm alleles generated by strong diversifying selection pressure acting on the emm gene could provide the means by which GAS strains evade a vaccine that includes only a single variant of each M-protein serotype; that is, creating vaccine-escape mutants.

To determine how common allelic variation was in the Toronto GAS population, we examined the number of alleles for each emm type found in specimens from pharyngitis patients in Toronto. For the top 10 serotypes, the most prevalent allele was found in 87.2% of the isolates (range 100%–42.7%). Notably, several prevalent emm types had an extensive number of alleles that would encode variant M proteins. For example, of the 6 most common serotypes, 4 had >6 allelic variants, and the most common emm type (emm12) had 16 different alleles.

Comparison of emm Type Distribution in Pharyngitis and Invasive GAS isolates

Previous studies have identified nonrandom associations between specific emm types and an increased risk for invasive infection (1417) or increased severity of invasive infection (18,19). Thus, we tested the hypothesis that certain emm types were more prevalent in invasive disease isolates than in pharyngitis isolates in the Toronto region. Consistent with previous reports (9,20,21), we found that emm1 and emm3 strains each had an invasive index >1.0 (Table 2), which suggests that these emm types are overrepresented among invasive infections. Additionally, emm49 strains had an exceptionally high invasive index (16.7), largely because of the rarity of these strains among the pharyngeal isolates.

Figure 3

Thumbnail of Frequency of emm3 strains among patients with group A Streptococcus pharyngitis and invasive disease, Ontario, Canada, 2002–2010, excluding 2004–2005. Black line indicates yearly frequency of invasive emm3 isolates; red line indicates emm3 frequency among pharyngeal isolates.

Figure 3. Frequency of emm3 strains among patients with group A Streptococcus pharyngitis and invasive disease, Ontario, Canada, 2002–2010, excluding 2004–2005. Black line indicates yearly frequency of invasive emm3 isolates; red line indicates...

Comparison of the annual change in emm type frequencies in pharyngitis and invasive disease isolates indicated that certain emm types had highly variable frequencies, consistent with epidemic behavior. In particular, emm3 pharyngitis strains peaked in frequency in 2006 to become the fourth most common emm type that year. This timing corresponds with the observed peak in cases of invasive disease caused by emm3 strains in 2006 (Figure 3), which suggests a relationship between abundance of pharyngitis cases and invasive infections.

Variability in Frequency Distribution of emm Types from Diverse Localities

Several studies have reported that emm type distribution can vary geographically. Generally, however, these comparisons involved localities separated by large distances. To test the hypothesis that emm type distribution varied over a relatively small geographic distance, we analyzed GAS isolates from pharyngitis patients at 5 additional areas across Ontario (London, Ottawa, North Bay/Elliot Lake, Sudbury, and Thunder Bay) during 2009–2010. In the aggregate, the emm types from the 5 geographically distinct collection sites closely resembled those found in Toronto in 2009 and 2010. The same 6 most prevalent emm types were found in 2009, and only 1 emm type differed in frequency in 2010. In general, emm types from individual collection sites were consistent from year to year (Table 3). However, we discovered striking inter-site variability in the distribution of emm types. For example, in 2009, emm89 was the most common emm type identified at 4 of the 6 localities, but emm89 strains were not among the 6 most common emm types found in Ottawa. Additionally, only 2 emm types were shared among the 5 most common organisms collected in North Bay and Sudbury, an unexpected result (p = 0.0007; Fisher exact test), given that these locations are separated by only ≈120 km.

We also observed apparent local outbreaks of certain emm types in some locations. In 2009 and 2010, emm3 strains were among the 6 most prevalent emm types in Ottawa but were rarely observed elsewhere. Most (33/43 [77%]) of the Ottawa emm3 strains had the emm3.53 allele, which differs from the emm3.2 allele by a single nucleotide change. Isolates with the emm3.2 allele are otherwise the most abundant emm3 strains in Ontario. We note that 1 isolate with the emm3.53 allele was found in Toronto in 2009, where it had not been observed in previous years, suggesting recent introduction. Subsequent studies will be required to determine whether the emm3.53 strain expands across Ontario and whether it has increased invasive potential.

Discussion

In this large study of emm type distribution among GAS pharyngitis strains in Canada, we identified a similar pattern of emm type distribution as reported in previous surveys and also observed that strains of a relatively few emm types dominate. The most abundant emm types were similar to those reported in previous studies of GAS pharyngitis strains from North America and Europe (8,9,12).

Figure 4

Thumbnail of Frequency of emm89 strains among patients with group A Streptococcus pharyngitis and invasive disease, Ontario, Canada, 2002–2010, excluding 2004–2005. Black line indicates yearly frequency of emm89 among invasive disease isolates; red line indicates frequency of emm89 among pharyngeal isolates.

Figure 4. Frequency of emm89 strains among patients with group A Streptococcus pharyngitis and invasive disease, Ontario, Canada, 2002–2010, excluding 2004–2005. Black line indicates yearly frequency of emm89 among invasive disease isolates; red...

Of note, we found that emm89 strains have recently increased in frequency in Ontario. Specifically, over a 9-year period, emm89 strains increased 5-fold and in 2010 were the second most common emm type in the Toronto sample. The increase in emm89 strains among pharyngeal isolates paralleled an increase in the frequency of emm89 strains among invasive GAS isolates from 2003 through 2010 (Figure 4). This finding suggests that a marked expansion of emm89 strains has occurred in Ontario. Regional outbreaks of emm89 strains have been documented previously, including a clonal epidemic that occurred in northern Italy (22). Surveillance conducted by CDC also has reported similar increases in emm89 strains among invasive infections in New York and Maryland during 2007–2009, and emm89 was among the top 5 invasive serotypes collected by CDC in 1998, 2001–2003, and 2007–2009 (23). Thus, emm89 strains may commonly contribute to local epidemics of pharyngitis and invasive disease.

Although the fact that the frequency distribution of GAS pharyngitis emm types varies across localities separated by large distances has been well described, we have shown that emm type distributions also can vary over relatively small distances. This finding expands knowledge of GAS epidemiology. Thus, GAS pharyngitis strains circulating in Ontario are a collection of distinct populations, apparently characterized by relatively limited transmission between distant locations. Much of our understanding of GAS epidemiology has been based on the characterization of strains causing local outbreaks of invasive disease and large surveillance networks encompassing geographically expansive catchment regions. This circumstance has led to the belief that GAS exists mostly as large, homogeneous populations. Our findings suggest that GAS populations are much more complex. This conclusion is supported by our previous genomewide analysis of invasive emm3 isolates from Ontario, which found that genetic distance and geographic proximity were strongly correlated and that groups of clonally related isolates were frequently limited to discrete geographic locations (24).

Our longitudinal analysis of emm types in Toronto indicated that several emm types (including emm1, emm2, emm3, and emm77) varied substantially in annual frequency, which suggests features of epidemic behavior. Comparison of yearly frequencies of emm types in emm3 isolates from patients with pharyngitis and invasive disease showed a nearly superimposable pattern, with coincident peaks of infection occurring in 2006 (Figure 3). This finding is consistent with a model in which many invasive GAS strains originate from the local pharyngitis strains and that cyclical outbreaks of invasive infection coincide or follow recent outbreaks of pharyngitis infections. A similar conclusion was reported by Hoe et al. (25), whose analysis of pharyngitis and invasive isolates from Finland showed that a novel streptococcal inhibitor of complement (sic) alleles first appeared in local pharyngitis strains before their appearance in invasive isolates. Furthermore, a GAS clone responsible for a local outbreak of invasive disease in Minnesota was common among pharyngeal isolates from school-aged children living in the outbreak area (26). Additional investigation into the genetic relationship between pharyngitis and invasive disease strains conducted at the full-genome level may provide useful information about the molecular events that contribute to invasive GAS.

The large size and longitudinal nature of our strain sample enabled us to obtain extensive information about the level of emm allelic variation and the rate of emergence of new emm alleles in Ontario. Previous experiments conducted by Dale et al. on 3 serotypes included in the 26-valent GAS vaccine found that slight allelic variants had little influence on bactericidal killing activity during in vitro assays, leading the researchers to conclude that variant subtypes might not affect vaccine efficacy (27). However, this finding contrasts with several other reports that observed a variable response to allelic variants (28,29). Whether the findings of Dale et al. are applicable to all 26 serotypes included in the vaccine is unknown (27). Despite its potential, albeit unproven, relevance to GAS vaccine design, we have a relatively limited understanding about this subject. We observed extensive emm allelic variation in Ontario, with most common emm types possessing >6 different alleles. We also found that strong selective pressure was driving the emergence of new M-protein variants, with all but one of the new alleles encoding amino acid substitutions. The observed ratio of synonymous to nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions indicates that allelic variation most likely is shaped by selective pressure, perhaps immune mediated. Previous investigators have also reported that the N-terminal regions of M proteins possess functional domains in addition to opsonic epitopes that might constrain the amount of variability within an M type (3033). Whether allelic variation may eventually result in escape mutants in a population with high levels of immunity, resulting from administration of an M-protein–based vaccine, is not known but should be considered. We believe this allelic variation might pose a challenge to GAS vaccine designs that rely on recombinant portions of the M-protein amino-terminus.

GAS M-protein serotypes are often regarded as genetically homogeneous populations composed of a single or relatively few clones. The remarkable level of emm type allelic diversity we observed in Ontario contrasts with this view. We found extensive diversity not only in the distribution of GAS serotypes but also on the allelic level and between geographic locations separated by short distances. Our recent genomewide analysis of invasive M3 isolates in Ontario revealed a strikingly complex genetic structure (24). Given the relationship between these populations, GAS pharyngeal isolates probably harbor an additional layer of genetic diversity that remains to be elucidated through whole-genome sequencing of a population of pharyngeal isolates.

Dr Shea is a scientist at the Methodist Hospital Research Institute in Houston, Texas. His research interests include host–pathogen interactions and human genetic factors that contribute to variability in host susceptibility to infectious disease.

Acknowledgments

For isolate collection and processing, we thank C. Cantu, M. Watkins, C. Béchard, M. Ped, L. Croteau, J. Racher, J. Creswell, V. Patel, L. Buschemeyer; B. Bennett, S. Gallant, S. Rudolf, B. Savard, L. Teskey, L. Kushner, K. McKee; J. Kapala, K. Biers, and staff; Gamma Dynacare Medical Laboratories Toronto; P. Kornherr and staff; Gamma Dynacare Medical Laboratories, Ottawa; S. Pong-Porter; and V. Porter.

N.F. was supported in part by Fonds de la Recherche en Santé du Québec.

References

  1. Carapetis JR, Steer AC, Mulholland EK, Weber M. The global burden of group A streptococcal diseases. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5:68594. DOIPubMed
  2. Pfoh E, Wessels MR, Goldmann D, Lee GM. Burden and economic cost of group A streptococcal pharyngitis. Pediatrics. 2008;121:22934. DOIPubMed
  3. Lancefield RC. The antigenic complex of Streptococcus haemolyticus: I. Demonstration of a type-specific substance in extracts of Streptococcus haemolyticus. J Exp Med. 1928;47:91103. DOIPubMed
  4. Scott JR, Pulliam WM, Hollingshead SK, Fischetti VA. Relationship of M protein genes in group A streptococci. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985;82:18226. DOIPubMed
  5. Dochez AR, Avery OT, Lancefield RC. Studies on the biology of Streptococcus: I. antigenic relationships between strains of Streptococcus haemolyticus. J Exp Med. 1919;30:179213. DOIPubMed
  6. Lancefield RC. Persistence of type-specific antibodies in man following infection with group A streptococci. J Exp Med. 1959;110:27192. DOIPubMed
  7. Manjula BN, Acharya AS, Fairwell T, Fischetti VA. Antigenic domains of the streptococcal Pep M5 protein. Localization of epitopes crossreactive with type 6 M protein and identification of a hypervariable region of the M molecule. J Exp Med. 1986;163:12938. DOIPubMed
  8. Shulman ST, Tanz RR, Dale JB, Beall B, Kabat W, Kabat K, Seven-year surveillance of North American pediatric group A streptococcal pharyngitis isolates. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:7884. DOIPubMed
  9. Shulman ST, Tanz RR, Kabat W, Kabat K, Cederlund E, Patel D, Group A streptococcal pharyngitis serotype surveillance in North America, 2000–2002. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39:32532. DOIPubMed
  10. Bisno AL, Rubin FA, Cleary PP, Dale JB. Prospects for a group A streptococcal vaccine: rationale, feasibility, and obstacles—report of a National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases workshop. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41:11506. DOIPubMed
  11. Hu MC, Walls MA, Stroop SD, Reddish MA, Beall B, Dale JB. Immunogenicity of a 26-valent group A streptococcal vaccine. Infect Immun. 2002;70:21717. DOIPubMed
  12. Darenberg J, Luca-Harari B, Jasir A, Sandgren A, Pettersson H, Schalen C, Molecular and clinical characteristics of invasive group A streptococcal infection in Sweden. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45:4508. DOIPubMed
  13. Espinosa LE, Li Z, Gomez Barreto D, Calderon Jaimes E, Rodriguez RS, Sakota V, M protein gene type distribution among group A streptococcal clinical isolates recovered in Mexico City, Mexico, from 1991 to 2000, and Durango, Mexico, from 1998 to 1999: overlap with type distribution within the United States. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:3738. DOIPubMed
  14. Kaul R, McGeer A, Low DE, Green K, Schwartz B. Population-based surveillance for group A streptococcal necrotizing fasciitis: clinical features, prognostic indicators, and microbiologic analysis of seventy-seven cases. Ontario Group A Streptococcal Study. Am J Med. 1997;103:1824. DOIPubMed
  15. Johnson DR, Stevens DL, Kaplan EL. Epidemiologic analysis of group A streptococcal serotypes associated with severe systemic infections, rheumatic fever, or uncomplicated pharyngitis. J Infect Dis. 1992;166:37482. DOIPubMed
  16. Musser JM, Hauser AR, Kim MH, Schlievert PM, Nelson K, Selander RK. Streptococcus pyogenes causing toxic-shock–like syndrome and other invasive diseases: clonal diversity and pyrogenic exotoxin expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88:266872. DOIPubMed
  17. Demers B, Simor AE, Vellend H, Schlievert PM, Byrne S, Jamieson F, Severe invasive group A streptococcal infections in Ontario, Canada: 1987–1991. Clin Infect Dis. 1993;16:792800, discussion 1–2. DOIPubMed
  18. Schwartz B, Facklam RR, Breiman RF. Changing epidemiology of group A streptococcal infection in the USA. Lancet. 1990;336:116771. DOIPubMed
  19. Sharkawy A, Low DE, Saginur R, Gregson D, Schwartz B, Jessamine P, Severe group A streptococcal soft-tissue infections in Ontario: 1992–1996. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34:45460. DOIPubMed
  20. Vlaminckx B, van Pelt W, Schouls L, van Silfhout A, Elzenaar C, Mascini E, Epidemiological features of invasive and noninvasive group A streptococcal disease in the Netherlands, 1992–1996. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2004;23:43444. DOIPubMed
  21. Ekelund K, Darenberg J, Norrby-Teglund A, Hoffmann S, Bang D, Skinhoj P, Variations in emm type among group A streptococcal isolates causing invasive or noninvasive infections in a nationwide study. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:31019. DOIPubMed
  22. Creti R, Imperi M, Baldassarri L, Pataracchia M, Recchia S, Alfarone G, emm Types, virulence factors, and antibiotic resistance of invasive Streptococcus pyogenes isolates from Italy: what has changed in 11 years? J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:224956. DOIPubMed
  23. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Active Bacterial Core surveillance report, Emerging Infections Program Network, group A Streptococcus. 2008–2010. [cited 2011 Feb 1]. http://www.cdc.gov/abcs/reports-findings/surv-reports.html
  24. Beres SB, Carroll RK, Shea PR, Sitkiewicz I, Martinez-Gutierrez JC, Low DE, Molecular complexity of successive bacterial epidemics deconvoluted by comparative pathogenomics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:43716. DOIPubMed
  25. Hoe NP, Vuopio-Varkila J, Vaara M, Grigsby D, De Lorenzo D, Fu YX, Distribution of streptococcal inhibitor of complement variants in pharyngitis and invasive isolates in an epidemic of serotype M1 group A Streptococcus infection. J Infect Dis. 2001;183:6339. DOIPubMed
  26. Cockerill FR III, MacDonald KL, Thompson RL, Roberson F, Kohner PC, Besser-Wiek J, An outbreak of invasive group A streptococcal disease associated with high carriage rates of the invasive clone among school-aged children. JAMA. 1997;277:3843. DOIPubMed
  27. Dale JB, Penfound T, Chiang EY, Long V, Shulman ST, Beall B. Multivalent group A streptococcal vaccine elicits bactericidal antibodies against variant M subtypes. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2005;12:8336.PubMed
  28. Villaseñor-Sierra A, McShan WM, Salmi D, Kaplan EL, Johnson DR, Stevens DL. Variable susceptibility to opsonophagocytosis of group A Streptococcus M-1 strains by human immune sera. J Infect Dis. 1999;180:19218. DOIPubMed
  29. de Malmanche SA, Martin DR. Protective immunity to the group A Streptococcus may be only strain specific. Med Microbiol Immunol (Berl). 1994;183:299306.PubMed
  30. Phillips GN Jr, Flicker PF, Cohen C, Manjula BN, Fischetti VA. Streptococcal M protein: alpha-helical coiled-coil structure and arrangement on the cell surface. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981;78:468993. DOIPubMed
  31. McNamara C, Zinkernagel AS, Macheboeuf P, Cunningham MW, Nizet V, Ghosh P. Coiled-coil irregularities and instabilities in group A Streptococcus M1 are required for virulence. Science. 2008;319:14058. DOIPubMed
  32. Johnsson E, Thern A, Dahlback B, Heden LO, Wikstrom M, Lindahl G. A highly variable region in members of the streptococcal M protein family binds the human complement regulator C4BP. J Immunol. 1996;157:30219.PubMed
  33. Johnsson E, Berggard K, Kotarsky H, Hellwage J, Zipfel PF, Sjobring U, Role of the hypervariable region in streptococcal M proteins: binding of a human complement inhibitor. J Immunol. 1998;161:4894901.PubMed

Figures

Tables

Suggested citation for this article: Shea PR, Ewbank AL, Gonzalez-Lugo JH, Martagon-Rosado AJ, Martinez-Gutierrez, JC, Rehman HA, et al. Group A Streptococcus emm gene types in pharyngeal isolates, Ontario, Canada, 2002–2010. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet]. 2011 Nov [date cited]. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1711.110159

DOI: 10.3201/eid1711.110159

Table of Contents – Volume 17, Number 11—November 2011

Comments to the Authors

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

James M. Musser, The Methodist Hospital Research Institute, B490, 6565 Fannin St, Houston, TX 77030, USA

character(s) remaining.

Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.

Comments to the EID Editors

Please contact the EID Editors via our Contact Form.

TOP