Skip directly to local search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to navigation Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options
CDC Home

Volume 18, Number 8—August 2012

Dispatch

Third-Generation Cephalosporin–Resistant Vibrio cholerae, India

Jharna Mandal, Vilwanathan Sangeetha, Vithiya Ganesan, Mohamudha Parveen, Venkatesan Preethi, Belgode Narasimha Harish, Sampath Srinivasan, Subhash Chandra ParijaComments to Author , and SangeethaPreethiSrinivasan S
Author affiliations: Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, India

Suggested citation for this article

Abstract

Vibrio cholerae resistance to third-generation cephalosporins is rarely reported. We detected a strain that was negative for extended-spectrum β-lactamase and positive for the AmpC disk test, modified Hodge test, and EDTA disk synergy test and harbored the blaDHA-1 and blaNDM-1 genes. The antimicrobial drug susceptibility profile of V. cholerae should be monitored.

Vibrio cholerae has developed enormous capabilities to combat antimicrobial drug effect. It possesses efflux pumps that act on multiple classes of antimicrobial drugs and elaborates enzymes that can hydrolyze complex antimicrobial drugs. It also can share antimicrobial resistance genes through integrons and conjugative plasmids that enable easy transfer of antimicrobial drug resistance genes and thus contribute to spread of antimicrobial resistance (1).

Even though fluid replacement plays a major role in treating cholera during outbreaks, antimicrobial drugs are crucial for controlling the disease and its spread. Antimicrobial therapy reduces shedding of the Vibrio cholerae bacillus in feces from >5 days to 1–2 days, thereby reducing the volume of diarrheic stool and the duration of illness, hastening recovery, and decreasing the chances of disease spread. In the absence of effective antimicrobial therapy, infected persons shed the bacillus for >5 days. Reported resistance to most commonly used antimicrobial drugs, i.e., tetracycline and ciprofloxacin (1), has limited options for therapy. Such drug-resistant V. cholerae strains threaten public health (2). Resistance to third-generation cephalosporins has rarely been reported (1). Our goal was to determine the mechanism(s) of resistance to third-generation cephalosporin by phenotypic and genotypic methods.

The Study

A 2-year-old child was admitted to the department of pediatrics at the Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Puducherry, India, with a provisional diagnosis of cholera. Before the child received antimicrobial therapy, a fecal specimen was submitted to the Department of Microbiology at JIPMER. The child was treated successfully with intravenous fluid supplements and ciprofloxacin.

Meanwhile, a strain of V. cholerae O1 El Tor Ogawa was isolated from the fecal specimen. This strain was biochemically identified (3) and confirmed by agglutination with specific antiserum (BD Difco, Becton Dickinson, Sparks, MD, USA). Antimicrobial drug susceptibility testing was conducted by Kirby–Bauer method in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (4) against ampicillin (10 μg), ceftriaxone (30 μg), ciprofloxacin (5 μg), furoxone (300 μg), cotrimoxazole (25 μg), and tetracycline (30 μg). The MIC for ceftriaxone was determined by the agar dilution method and Etest for the El Tor Ogawa strain. For the agar dilution method, we doubled dilutions of ceftriaxone sodium (Himedia, Mumbai, India) from 0.5 μg/mL to 128 μg/mL, which included the recommended break points (5). American Type Culture Collection Escherichia coli 25922 was spread on each plate as growth control. The Etest was performed according to the manufacturers’ instructions (AB bioMérieux, Solna, Sweden). We performed the combination disk test using cefotaxime and ceftazidime, alone and in combination with clavulanic acid, to detect extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) in accordance with Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (4). The AmpC disk test was performed as described (6). The modified Hodge test and imipenem-EDTA disk synergy test for the phenotypic detection of carbapenemase were performed as described (4,7). We extracted DNA from the strain by using the boiling method. PCR was performed to detect ESBL genes, i.e., blaCTX (8), blaSHV (8), and blaTEM (9); a multiplex PCR was used to detect the AmpC group of genes, i.e., blaMOX, blaCIT, blaDHA, and blaACC (10). A multiplex PCR to detect carbapenemase genes, i.e., blaKPC, blaIMP, blaVIM, and blaNDM, was performed (11). Sequencing was performed to identify AmpC β-lactamase gene and the carbapenemase gene. Sequencing of these genes was conducted by Macrogen Inc. (Seoul, South Korea). We used the BLASTN program (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST) for database searching.

The strain was resistant to ampicillin, ceftriaxone, cotrimoxazole, and furoxone and sensitive only to ciprofloxacin and tetracycline. The MIC for ceftriaxone was 16 μg/mL. The phenotypic tests for ESBL detection were negative. PCRs for detection of the ESBL genes were negative. Because the strain was negative for the phenotypic and the genotypic tests for ESBL production, in our attempt to determine the reason for the increased MIC, we further tested for the AmpC type of β-lactamase production. The strain, an AmpC β-lactamase producer, was positive for the blaDHA gene (405 bp) by multiplex PCR. On sequencing, the blaDHA gene detected had 99% identity with Klebsiella pneumoniae β-lactamase blaDHA-1 gene (GenBank accession no. AY635140.1). Because carbapenems are considered the treatment of choice for AmpC-producing organisms, we tested the strain for the production of carbapenemase and found it to be a carbapenemase producer by a positive modified Hodge test and by the EDTA disk synergy test. The multiplex PCR for detection of carbapenemase genes yielded an amplicon of 660 bp, which was confirmed by sequencing to be an blaNDM-1 gene and had 100% identity with E. coli strain HK-01 plasmid pNDM-HK (GenBank accession no. HQ451074.1).

To demonstrate the presence of a plasmid bearing the blaNDM-1 gene, we isolated a plasmid using the alkaline lysis method (12) from the V. cholerae strain. This plasmid was subjected to the multiplex PCR to detect the carbapenemase genes mentioned earlier (11), which yielded an amplicon of 660 bp matching that of the blaNDM-1 gene amplicon. We transferred this plasmid by a method described by Lee et al. (13) and used E. coli J53 as the recipient, which was isolated on meropenem (4 mg/L) containing Luria-Bertani agar and MacConkey agar, meropenem (4 mg/L), and sodium azide (100 mg/L) (14). We also subjected the V. cholerae plasmid to the multiplex PCR to detect the AmpC gene, as mentioned earlier, but none of the genes were amplified. We failed to transfer the AmpC gene (blaDHA-1) by using the plasmid transfer experiment. Such failures of transfer of blaDHA-1 have been mentioned by Yan et al. (15).

Of the many AmpC genes known are 2 types of blaDHA genes: blaDHA-1 and blaDHA-2; both are inducible plasmid-mediated genes. Because the strain reported here was already resistant to a third-generation cephalosporin, i.e., ceftriaxone, we did not perform the inducible AmpC test and proceeded to perform the AmpC disk test. Plasmid-mediated inducible β-lactamases are extremely rare and are most often constitutive (15). The AmpC disk test does not differentiate between chromosomal and plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamases. We do not have complete information about the chromosomal AmpC genes in V. cholerae.

Carbapenems are the treatment of choice for AmpC-producing strains (6) and are hydrolyzed by carbapenemases, which have many families, including the metallo-β-lactamases (7). The most recently described blaNDM-1 (New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase) is plasmid-mediated metallo-β-lactamase and has been isolated from the environment and from hospitals (14).

Conclusions

We isolated a clinical strain of V. cholerae producing an AmpC β-lactamase and a carbapenemase. Our findings, although perhaps not an issue for treatment of cholera, have other implications. The critical role of all bacteriology laboratories needs to be emphasized for determining not only resistance patterns but also the mechanisms of resistance. Health care–associated networks need to be strengthened to ensure justified and appropriate use of antimicrobial agents that will result in safe drinking water and improved sanitation; these can have remarkable effect in reducing the spread of many communicable diseases, such as cholera, and can go a long way in controlling the growing menace of antimicrobial drug resistance. In light of the above findings, the antimicrobial drug profile of organisms, such as V. cholerae, needs to be under constant surveillance in the community.

Dr Mandal is an assistant professor in the Department of Microbiology at JIPMER, Puducherry, India, and is in charge of the stool and urine section and the molecular biology division in the department. Her research interests include diarrheal diseases, urinary tract infections, and antimicrobial drug resistance.

References

  1. Ghosh A, Ramamurthy T. Antimicrobials & cholera: are we stranded? Indian J Med Res. 2011;133:22531.PubMed
  2. Sack DA, Lyke C, McLaughlin C, Suwanvanichkij V. Antimicrobial resistance in shigellosis, cholera and campylobacteriosis. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001 [cited 2012 May 28]. http://www.who.int/drugresistance/Antimicrobial_resistance_in_shigellosis_cholera_and_cam.pdf
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Laboratory methods for the diagnosis of epidemic dysentery and cholera. Atlanta: The Centers; 1999 [cited 2012 May 28]. http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dbmd/diseaseinfo/cholera/top.pdf
  4. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Twentieth informational supplement. M100–S20. Wayne (PA): The Institute; 2010.
  5. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for antimicrobial dilution and disk susceptibility testing of infrequently isolated or fastidious bacteria; approved guideline. M45A2. 2nd ed. Wayne (PA): The Institute; 2010.
  6. Black JA, Moland ES, Thomson KS. AmpC disk test for detection of plasmid mediated AmpC β-lactamases in Enterobacteriaceae lacking chromosomal AmpC β-lactamases. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:31103. DOIPubMed
  7. Queenan AM, Bush K. Carbapenemases: the versatile β-lactamases. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007;20:44058. DOIPubMed
  8. Jemima SA, Verghese S. Multiplex PCR for blaCTX-M & blaSHV in the extended spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) producing gram-negative isolates. Indian J Med Res. 2008;128:3137.PubMed
  9. Kim S, Kim J, Kang Y, Park Y, Lee B. Occurrence of ESBL in the members of the genus Shigella in the Republic of Korea. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:52649. DOIPubMed
  10. Pérez-Pérez FJ, Hanson ND. Detection of plasmid-mediated AmpC beta-lactamase genes in clinical isolates by using multiplex PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:215362. DOIPubMed
  11. Mulvey MR, Grant JM, Plewes K, Roscoe D, Boyd DA. New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase in Klebsiella pneumoniae and Escherichia coli, Canada. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:1036. DOIPubMed
  12. Birmboin HC, Doly J. A rapid alkaline lysis procedure for screening recombinant plasmid DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1979;7:151523.
  13. Lee SH, Kim JY, Lee GS, Cheon SH, An YJ, Jeong SH, Characterization of blaCMY-11 an AmpC-type plasmid-mediated β-lactamase gene in a Korean clinical isolate of Escherichia coli. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2002;49:26973. DOIPubMed
  14. Walsh TR, Weeks J, Livermore DM, Toleman MA. Dissemination of NDM-1 positive bacteria in the New Delhi environment and its implications for human health: an environmental point prevalence study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2011;11:35562. DOIPubMed
  15. Yan JJ, Ko WC, Jung YC, Chuang CL, Wu JJ. Emergence of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates producing inducible DHA-1 β-lactamase in a university hospital in Taiwan. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:31216. DOIPubMed

Suggested citation for this article: Mandal J, Sangeetha V, Ganesan V, Parveen M, Preethi V, Harish BN, et al. Third-generation cephalosporin–resistant Vibrio cholerae, India. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet] 2012 Aug [date cited]. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1808.111686

DOI: 10.3201/eid1808.111686

Top of Page

Table of Contents – Volume 18, Number 8—August 2012

Comments to the Authors

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Subhash Chandra Parija, Department of Microbiology, JIPMER, Puducherry-605006, India





characters(s) remaining.

Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.

Comments to the EID Editors

Please contact the EID Editors via our Contact Form.

 

Past Issues

Select a Past Issue:

Art in Science - Selections from Emerging Infectious Diseases
Now available for order



CDC 24/7 – Saving Lives, Protecting People, Saving Money. Learn More About How CDC Works For You…

USA.gov: The U.S. Government's Official Web PortalDepartment of Health and Human Services
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention   1600 Clifton Rd. Atlanta, GA 30333, USA
800-CDC-INFO (800-232-4636) TTY: (888) 232-6348 - Contact CDC–INFO