Skip directly to local search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to navigation Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options
CDC Home

Volume 19, Number 2—February 2013

Dispatch

Macrolide- and Rifampin-Resistant Rhodococcus equi on a Horse Breeding Farm, Kentucky, USA

Alexandra J. Burton, Steeve GiguèreComments to Author , Tracy L. Sturgill, Londa J. Berghaus, Nathan M. Slovis, Jeremy L. Whitman, Court Levering, Kyle R. Kuskie, and Noah D. Cohen
Author affiliations: Author affiliations: University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA (A.J. Burton, S. Giguère, T.L. Sturgill, L.J. Berghaus); Hagyard Equine Medical Institute, Lexington, Kentucky, USA (N.M. Slovis); Equine Medical Associates, Lexington (J.L. Whitman, C. Levering); Texas A & M University, College Station, Texas, USA (K.R. Kuskie, N.D. Cohen)

Suggested citation for this article

Abstract

Macrolide and rifampin resistance developed on a horse breeding farm after widespread use was instituted for treatment of subclinical pulmonary lesions in foals. Resistance occurred in 6 (24%) of 25 pretreatment and 8 (62%) of 13 (62%) posttreatment isolates from affected foals. Drug-resistant isolates formed 2 distinct genotypic clusters.

Rhodococcus equi is a major cause of pneumonia in young horses and a common opportunistic pathogen of immunocompromised humans (1). Over the past decade, control of R. equi infections at many horse farms to which the disease is endemic has relied on early detection of subclinical pulmonary disease by use of thoracic ultrasonography and initiation of treatment with antimicrobial drugs before development of clinical signs (2). This approach appears to have decreased deaths caused by R. equi pneumonia at some farms, although controlled studies are lacking (2). However, the temporal association between widespread use of macrolides and rifampin and a perceived increase in the frequency of detection of drug-resistant isolates in the past decade (3) suggest that this practice may not be innocuous.

We describe emergence of resistance to macrolides and rifampin among R. equi isolates obtained from a horse breeding farm. We conducted this study after initiation of an ultrasonographic screening program on the farm and resulting widespread use of these drugs in foals with subclinical pulmonary lesions.

The Study

This study was conducted at a Thoroughbred horse breeding farm in Kentucky, USA. The farm initiated an ultrasonographic screening program in 2001 in an attempt to decrease deaths associated with pneumonia caused by R. equi through early diagnosis and treatment of foals with subclinical lesions. During March–July 2010, the farm reported 9 foals infected with macrolide- and rifampin-resistant R. equi isolates. This finding led to a disease investigation consisting of retrospective data collection (Table 1), collection of air samples in September 2010 to determine the prevalence of drug-resistant R. equi in the environment, and prospective culture of pulmonary lesions from all foals in 2011 before initiation of antimicrobial drug therapy.

A total of 124 air samples were collected from the 4 barns at the farm and from each of their respective surrounding paddocks by using a portable air-sampling device as described (4). For the 2011 breeding season, a tracheobronchial aspirate was collected transendoscopically from each foal that had ultrasonographically detected pulmonary lesions before initiation of therapy by using a triple-guarded microbiological aspiration catheter. A second tracheobronchial aspirate was collected by using the same method 2 weeks after initiation of therapy. Decisions regarding the need for therapy and selection of antimicrobial agents were made by the farm veterinarian and manage.

After standard microbiological culture of air and tracheobronchial aspirate samples, confirmation of R. equi was accomplished by amplification of the choE gene and detection of the virulence plasmid by amplification of the vapA gene by using multiplex PCR (5). For each isolate, the MICs of erythromycin, azithromycin, clarithromycin, and rifampin were determined from 3–5 isolated colonies by broth dilution in accordance with Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (6). R. equi isolates with MIC values <2 µg/mL for azithromycin and clarithromycin, <0.5 µg/mL for erythromycin, and <1 µg/mL for rifampin were considered susceptible, and isolates with MIC values >8 µg/mL were considered resistant.

The similarity of R. equi isolates from air and tracheobronchial aspirate samples was determined by using a repetitive sequence–based PCR (DiversiLab; bioMérieux Inc., Durham, NC, USA) previously validated for R. equi (7). Isolates were clustered as the same strain on the basis of >95% similarity and a difference of <1 band (8).

The ultrasonographic screening program was introduced in 2001, and the first isolates of R. equi resistant to macrolides and rifampin were identified in 2008 (Table 1). There were no R. equi isolates that were resistant to either a macrolide or rifampin alone. Air sampling yielded 82 isolates of R. equi. Of these isolates, 15 (18%) contained the plasmid required for virulence in foals and 67 (82%) were avirulent.

All 15 virulent isolates and 23 randomly selected avirulent isolates were used for in vitro antimicrobial drug susceptibility testing and genotyping. Two (5%) of 38 isolates tested were resistant to azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin, and rifampin. One resistant isolate was virulent and came from an outdoor paddock location that had been used to house foals given a diagnosis of R. equi pneumonia caused by drug-resistant isolates. The other resistant isolate was avirulent and was isolated from an air sample obtained from an indoor barn location.

During the 2011 season, 132 foals were born on the farm. Thoracic ultrasonography showed evidence of pulmonary disease in 27 (20%) foals. Culture of a tracheobronchial aspirate before initiation of therapy yielded R. equi in 25 (93%) of the 27 foals sampled (Table 1). Of the 25 pretreatment R. equi isolates, 6 (24%) were resistant to macrolides and rifampin. Twenty-four foals were treated with clarithromycin and rifampin. Tracheobronchial aspirates were collected 2 weeks after initiation of therapy in 19 foals, and R. equi was cultured from 13 (68%) of the 19 samples. Of these 13 posttreatment isolates, 8 (62%) were resistant to macrolides and rifampin. After identification of resistant isolates, 3 foals had a third antimicrobial agent added to their therapy (gentamicin, n = 2; doxycycline, n = 1). All foals with a diagnosis of pneumonia caused by R. equi in 2011 survived.

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Dendrogram and virtual gel repetitive sequence–based PCR fingerprint patterns of foal and air (barn and paddock)–derived isolates of Rhodococcus equi on horse breeding farm, Kentucky, USA, 2010. Macrolide and rifampin susceptibility (S) or resistance (R) are indicated. A indicates the main cluster of drug-resistant isolates (5 foal and 1 air).

Figure 1. . Dendrogram and virtual gel repetitive sequence–based PCR fingerprint patterns of foal and air (barn and paddock)–derived isolates of Rhodococcus equi on horse breeding farm, Kentucky, USA, 2010. Macrolide and rifampin...

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Dendrogram and virtual gel repetitive sequence–based PCR fingerprint patterns of 36 Rhodococcus equi isolates obtained from foals on horse breeding farm, Kentucky, USA, 2011. Macrolide and rifampin susceptibility (S) and resistance (R) are indicated. B–E indicates clusters of drug-resistant isolates. Foals from which pretreatment (pre) and posttreatment (post) samples were obtained are indicated. a and b indicate samples from which 2 isolates were obtained.

Figure 2. . Dendrogram and virtual gel repetitive sequence–based PCR fingerprint patterns of 36 Rhodococcus equi isolates obtained from foals on horse breeding farm, Kentucky, USA, 2011. Macrolide and rifampin susceptibility (S) and...

Genotypes by repetitive sequence–based PCR from all 2010 isolates grouped into 1 main cluster consisting of resistant isolates from 5 foals and 1 air sample (Figure 1, cluster A). Isolates resistant to macrolides and rifampin from the 2011 foals grouped closely, forming 4 clusters (B–E); the largest cluster (B) contained 7 isolates (Figure 2). Of the 11 foals for which pretreatment and posttreatment samples were collected in 2011, a total of 5 had similar pretreatment and posttreatment isolates and 6 had different pretreatment and posttreatment isolates (Table 2).

Conclusions

Recently, development of macrolide resistance in clinically relevant pathogens has been recognized in human and animal populations that received intensive macrolide treatment (9,10). We documented that macrolide- and rifampin-resistant isolates of R. equi occurred 7 years after initiation of an ultrasonographic screening program, which resulted in treatment of all foals with subclinical pulmonary lesions.

Compared with macrolide-susceptible Campylobacter jejuni, acquisition of macrolide resistance impairs the fitness and transmission of the pathogen in chickens, suggesting that the prevalence of macrolide-resistant C. jejuni would probably decrease in the absence of antimicrobial drug selection pressure (11). Similarly, studies in humans have shown that macrolide resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae decreased 2–5 years after use of azithromycin was stopped and selection pressure was abolished (10). Although the fitness cost of macrolide resistance among R. equi isolates might be sufficient to ensure its eventual elimination, this elimination will take time and elimination of resistance will only occur in the absence of antimicrobial drug selection pressure (10).

A recent study on a large horse farm indicated that the proportion of foals with ultrasonographic pulmonary lesions associated with R. equi infection that recovered was not different between foals given azithromycin and rifampin and foals given a placebo (12). This surprising finding, combined with the apparent increase in macrolide- and rifampin-resistance demonstrated in the present study, support the need to stop the practice of mass macrolide treatment for subclinical infection with R. equi in foals on horse breeding farms. The goal should be to more accurately identify, of the many subclinically infected foals, which few are likely to show development of disease and thus require treatment for it.

Dr Burton is a graduate research assistant at the University of Georgia. Her primary research interests include infectious diseases of horses with emphasis on infections caused by R. equi.

Acknowledgments

We thank Kristen M. Guldbech and Tina Elam for assistance.

This study was supported by the Hodgson Equine Research Endowment of the University of Georgia and the Link Equine Research Endowment of Texas A&M University. The air sampler used in this study was available as a result of a grant from the Grayson-Jockey Club Research Foundation.

References

  1. Yamshchikov AV, Schuetz A, Lyon GM. Rhodococcus equi infection. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010;10:3509. DOIPubMed
  2. Slovis NM, McCracken JL, Mundy G. How to use thoracic ultrasound to screen foals for Rhodococcus equi at affected farms. Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the American Association of Equine Practitioners. 2005;51:274–8.
  3. Giguère S, Lee E, Williams E, Cohen ND, Chaffin MK, Halbert N, Determination of the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance to macrolide antimicrobials or rifampin in Rhodococcus equi isolates and treatment outcome in foals infected with antimicrobial-resistant isolates of R equi. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2010;237:7481. DOIPubMed
  4. Kuskie KR, Smith JL, Wang N, Carter CN, Chaffin MK, Slovis NM, Effects of location for collection of air samples on a farm and time of day of sample collection on airborne concentrations of virulent Rhodococcus equi at two horse breeding farms. Am J Vet Res. 2011;72:739. DOIPubMed
  5. Halbert ND, Reitzel RA, Martens RJ, Cohen ND. Evaluation of a multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay for simultaneous detection of Rhodococcus equi and the vapA gene. Am J Vet Res. 2005;66:13805. DOIPubMed
  6. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Twelfth informational supplement. Wayne (PA): The Institute; 2009.
  7. Bolton T, Kuskie K, Halbert N, Chaffin K, Healy M, Lawhon S, Detection of strain variation in isolates of Rhodococcus equi from an affected foal using repetitive sequence-based polymerase chain reaction. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2010;22:6115. DOIPubMed
  8. Babouee B, Frei R, Schultheiss E, Widmer AF, Goldenberger D. Comparison of the DiversiLab repetitive element PCR system with spa typing and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis for clonal characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:154955. DOIPubMed
  9. Gerchman I, Levisohn S, Mikula I, Manso-Silvan L, Lysnyansky I. Characterization of in vivo–acquired resistance to macrolides of Mycoplasma gallisepticum strains isolated from poultry. Vet Res. 2011;42:90. DOIPubMed
  10. Maher MC, Alemayehu W, Lakew T, Gaynor BD, Haug S, Cevallos V, The fitness cost of antibiotic resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae: insight from the field. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e29407. DOIPubMed
  11. Luangtongkum T, Shen Z, Seng VW, Sahin O, Jeon B, Liu P, Impaired fitness and transmission of macrolide-resistant Campylobacter jejuni in its natural host. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56:13008. DOIPubMed
  12. Venner M, Rodiger A, Laemmer M, Giguère S. Failure of antimicrobial therapy to accelerate spontaneous healing of subclinical pulmonary abscesses on a farm with endemic infections caused by Rhodococcus equi. Vet J. 2012;192:2938. DOIPubMed

Figures

Tables

Suggested citation for this article: Burton AJ, Giguère S, Sturgill TL, Berghaus LJ, Slovis NM, Whitman JL, et al. Macrolide- and rifampin-resistant Rhodococcus equi on horse breeding farm, Kentucky, USA. Emerg Infect Dis [Internet]. 2013 Feb [date cited]. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1902.121210

DOI: 10.3201/eid1902.121210

1Current affiliation: Kalon Biotherapeutics LLC, College Station, Texas, USA.

Top of Page

Table of Contents – Volume 19, Number 2—February 2013

Comments to the Authors

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Steeve Giguère, Department of Large Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA





characters(s) remaining.

Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.

Comments to the EID Editors

Please contact the EID Editors via our Contact Form.

 

Past Issues

Select a Past Issue:

Art in Science - Selections from Emerging Infectious Diseases
Now available for order



CDC 24/7 – Saving Lives, Protecting People, Saving Money. Learn More About How CDC Works For You…

USA.gov: The U.S. Government's Official Web PortalDepartment of Health and Human Services
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention   1600 Clifton Rd. Atlanta, GA 30333, USA
800-CDC-INFO (800-232-4636) TTY: (888) 232-6348 - Contact CDC–INFO