Volume 19, Number 3—March 2013
Virulence of Pertactin-Negative Bordetella pertussis Isolates from Infants, France
Bordetella pertussis isolates that do not express pertactin (PRN) are increasing in regions where acellular pertussis vaccines have been used for >7 years. We analyzed data from France and compared clinical symptoms among infants <6 months old infected by PRN-positive or PRN-negative isolates. No major clinical differences were found between the 2 groups.
Bordetella pertussis and B. parapertussis are closely related bacterial species, and both cause whooping cough. As early as 1959, whole-cell pertussis vaccine was used intensively in France for primary vaccination of infants at 3–5 months of age and for the first booster at 24 months (1). This vaccine program resulted in a dramatic decrease in the incidence of pertussis among young children. Acellular pertussis vaccines (2- and 3–component vaccines) were introduced in 1998 as boosters for vaccinated adolescents and were rapidly adopted for primary vaccination of infants. These vaccines replaced whole-cell pertussis vaccines in 2005, changing herd immunity by specifically targeting the virulence of the bacteria (2,3).
Since 1996, in France, an active hospital-based surveillance network has performed whooping cough surveillance. The network comprises 42 pediatric hospitals, which participate on a voluntary basis; the National Reference Centre, which is located in the laboratory of the Molecular Prevention and Therapy of Human Diseases Unit at Institut Pasteur; and the French Institute for Public Health surveillance (3–4). Participating pediatricians complete a standardized form for every child suspected to have whooping cough. Microbiologists list culture and PCR results and send the clinical isolates to the National Reference Centre for validation of the results. This system of data collection has been unchanged since establishment of the network; data collected is used to analyze trends over time (3–4).
We have analyzed the evolution of the bacterial population under vaccine pressure, using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, genotyping, microarrays, and tests for virulence factor expression (5–9). Immunity induced by the whole-cell pertussis vaccine controlled the circulation of vaccine-type isolates but not all types of isolates (5,6). The isolates remaining in circulation are as virulent as those circulating during the prevaccine era (7–9). Since the introduction of acellular pertussis vaccines, the number of B. pertussis and B. parapertussis isolates collected that do not express pertactin (PRN), which is used as a vaccine antigen (7–11), has steadily increased. The proportion of PRN-negative (PRN–) isolates to the total number of isolates collected each year increased from 2% in 2005 to 14% in 2012 (8), indicating that PRN– isolates are transmissible. Studies using animal and cellular models of infection indicate that these PRN– isolates are as virulent as those expressing PRN (PRN+) (7–9). However, an analysis and comparison of the clinical symptoms induced by infection with PRN– and PRN+ isolates in infants convey direct information on this strictly human disease. Here, we report a preliminary retrospective comparison of the clinical symptoms of infants <6 months old in France who were infected by PRN– isolates and clinical symptoms of those infected with PRN+ isolates during 2004–2011.
For the purpose of this study, we used a questionnaire that was more detailed than the one in the standardized form from the hospital-based surveillance program. The questionnaire, including the list of variables described in Table 1, was sent to pediatricians who voluntarily participated. We compared surveys for each patient infected by a PRN– isolate with 2 or 3 randomly selected standardized forms that had been completed by pediatricians and that described patients <6 months of age who were infected by PRN+ isolates during the same period. We sent 68 questionnaires (20 for PRN– isolates, 48 for PRN+ isolates). We received 60 completed questionnaires (40 for infants infected with a PRN+ isolate, 20 for infants with a PRN– isolate).
The available anonymous variables analyzed are shown in Table 1. To compare percentages, we used the χ2 or Fisher exact test if n<5. To compare means, we used the Mann-Whitney U test. There were no substantial differences in distribution of PRN– and PRN+ isolates among patients in the 2 groups in terms of sex and age (60% of infants infected with PRN– isolates were boys, as were 50% of those infected with PRN+ isolates; the mean ages of infants in each group were 66 and 61 days, respectively). There was an even distribution of PRN– and PRN+ isolates among the infants across the years studied. Forty-six infants had received no pertussis acellular vaccine, and 11 had received 1 dose. One child >4 months of age received a second dose 4 days before the onset of symptoms. According to information compiled from the survey that used the standardized form, 21.05% of PRN– patients and 20.51% of PRN+ patients had been vaccinated. None of the children had received 3 doses. In each group, ≈10% of infants received vaccinations as scheduled for their age (1 dose of vaccine for each infant). The duration of hospitalization or stay in intensive care was shorter for the group of infants infected with a PRN– isolate, but the difference was not significant (p = 0.18 vs. p = 0.24). The differences found between the 2 groups of infants in terms of the classical symptoms (apnea, vomiting, paroxysmal cough, whoop, bradycardia, and hyperlymphocytosis) were not significant (p = 0.68, p = 0.29, p = 1, p = 0.66, p = 0.6, and p = 0.64, respectively). The only significant difference (p = 0.04) was that the time between the beginning of the cough and hospitalization was longer for infants infected with a PRN– isolate; this finding might reflect less severe disease in this group.
We calculated delay of transmission as the time of onset of coughing by the first member of a household to that by the case-patient. The median delay of transmission was 14.5 and 14.0 days, respectively, in PRN– and PRN+ groups. Among the documented cases, B. pertussis was transmitted to the infant by a household member in 84% of the PRN– cases and 91% of the PRN+ cases.
Vaccination was associated with less severe clinical symptoms (Table 2): the proportion of hospitalizations in intensive care units was significantly lower in the vaccinated group (p = 0.001). Clinical symptoms, such as apnea, syncope, cyanosis, and deterioration of general condition, were also less frequent in the vaccinated group (Table 2). This confirms previous findings (12) indicating that infants who receive 1 or 2 doses of pertussis vaccine are protected to some extent.
These preliminary data are consistent with those we obtained using murine and cellular models (8,9). Although the number of infants included in this study is small, we could detect no major difference between the 2 groups; this finding suggests that PRN– isolates are as virulent as PRN+ isolates. This conclusion is also in agreement with data obtained during a clinical trial performed in Italy (13). We recommend the continuation of such analyses, and close collaboration of clinicians and microbiologists, to follow the evolution of B. pertussis subspecies in terms of virulence. This will help identify strategies to overcome increased adaptive herd immunity induced by acellular pertussis vaccines.
Dr Bodilis is a physician who works in the Clinical Research Center for Vaccinology in Cochin Hospital, Paris. Her research interests focus on vaccines, and in particular immunocompromised hosts.
Dr Guiso is director of the Molecular Prevention and Therapy of Human Diseases Research Unit, the French National Centre of Reference for Whooping Cough and Other Bordetelloses, and the French National Centre of Corynebacteria of the diphtheria complex at the Institut Pasteur, Paris. Her research interests include the consequences of the intensive use of vaccines on the human population and on bacterial populations targeted by vaccines.
We thank Thierry Lamireau, Michel Brun, Françoise Dieulangard, PhilippeLanotte, Sophie-Anne Gibaud, Alain Le Coustumier, Françoise Troussier, Corentine Alauzet, Patrick Brizard, Jean-Michel Sheftel, Benoît Jaulhac, Anne-Laure Virlouvet, Yves Gillet, Ghislaine Descours, Emmanuel Grimprel, Mathie Lorrot, Didier Pinquier, Jean-Claude Poutard, François Eb, Fabien Garnier, Bruno Pozetto, Florence Grattard, and Christophe Burucoa for providing clinical information for this study.
This study was supported by the Institut Pasteur Foundation and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris.
- Baron S, Njamkepo E, Grimprel E, Begue P, Desenclos JC, Drucker J, Epidemiology of pertussis in French hospitals in 1993 and 1994: thirty years after a routine use of vaccination. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1998;17:412–8.
- Haut conseil de la santé publique. Calendrier vaccinal 2008 [cited 2013 Jan 14]. Bulletin Epidemiologique Hebdomadaire. 2008;16–17:1–20 http://www.invs.sante.fr/beh/2008/16_17/index.htm.
- Bonmarin I, Levy-Bruhl D, Baron S, Guiso N, Njamkepo E, Caro V. Pertussis surveillance in French hospitals: results from a 10 year period. Euro Surveill. 2007;12:678 and http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=678.
- Belchior E, Bonmarin I, Guillot S, Savitch Y, Levy-Bruhl D, Guiso N, Whooping cough surveillance in French hospital Renacoq net: data from 1996 to 2010. Paper presented at the 30th Annual Meeting of the European Society for Paediatric Infectious Diseases; 2012 May 10; Tessaloniki, Greece.
- Weber C, Boursaux-Eude C, Coralie G, Caro V, Guiso N. Polymorphism of Bordetella pertussis isolates circulating the last ten years in France, where a single effective whole-cell vaccine has been used for more than thirty years. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:4396–403.
- Caro V, Hot D, Guigon G, Hubans C, Arrive M, Soubigou G, Temporal analysis of French Bordetella pertussis isolates by comparative whole-genome hybridization. Microbes Infect. 2006;8:2228–35.
- Bouchez V, Brun D, Cantinelli T, Dore G, Njamkepo E, Guiso N. First report and detailed characterization of B. pertussis isolates not expressing pertussis toxin or pertactin. Vaccine. 2009;27:6034–41.
- Hegerle N, Paris AS, Brun D, Dore G, Njamkepo E, Guillot S, Evolution of French Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis isolates: increase of bordetellae not expressing pertactin. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18:E340–6.
- Bouchez V, Brun D, Dore G, Njamkepo E, Guiso N. Bordetella parapertussis isolates not expressing pertactin circulating in France. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17:675–82 .
- Barkoff AM, Mertsola J, Guillot S, Guiso N, Berbers G, He Q. Appearance of Bordetella pertussis strains not expressing vaccine antigen pertactin in Finland. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2012;19:1703–4 http://cvi.asm.org/content/19/10/1703.full.
- Otsuka N, Han HJ, Toyoizumi-Ajisaka H, Nakamura Y, Arakawa Y, Shibayama K, Prevalence and genetic characterization of pertactin-deficient Bordetella pertussis in Japan. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e31985 .
- Olin P, Gustafsson L, Barreto L, Hessel L, Mast TC, Rie AV, Declining pertussis incidence in Sweden following the introduction of acellular pertussis vaccine. Vaccine. 2003;21:2015–21.
- Mastrantonio P, Spigaglia P, van Oirschot H, van der Heide HGJ, Heuvelman K, Stefanelli P, Antigenic variants in Bordetella pertussis strains isolated from vaccinated and unvaccinated children. Microbiology. 1999;145:2069–75 .
- Table 1. Characteristics and clinical signs and symptoms of patients <6 mo of age infected with Bordetella pertussis isolates negative or positive for pertactin, France, 2004–2011
- Table 2. Clinical signs and symptoms of vaccinated and unvaccinated pertussis patients, France, 2004–2007
Suggested citation for this article: Bodilis H, Guiso N. Virulence of pertactin-negative Bordetella pertussis isolates from infants, France. Emerg Inect Dis [Internet]. 2012 Mar [date cited]. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1903.121475
1Current affiliation: Cochin Hospital, Paris, France
Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:
Nicole Guiso, Institut Pasteur, Molecular Prevention and Therapy of Human Diseases Unit, 25 rue du Dr Roux, 75724 Paris Cedex 15, France
Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
- Page created: February 27, 2013
- Page last updated: February 27, 2013
- Page last reviewed: February 27, 2013
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID)
Office of the Director (OD)