Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 19, Number 9—September 2013
Dispatch

Gastroenteritis Outbreak Associated with Unpasteurized Tempeh, North Carolina, USA

Figures
Tables
Article Metrics
13
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Author affiliations: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (S.E. Griese, A.T. Fleischauer, J.K. MacFarquhar, M. Mikoleit, A.E. Newton, B. Jackson, T.-A. Nguyen, S. Bosch); North Carolina Division of Public Health, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA (S.E. Griese, A.T. Fleischauer, J.K. MacFarquhar, Z. Moore, C. Harrelson, A. Valiani, D. Sweat, J.-M. Maillard, D. Griffin, D. Springer, M. Davies); Buncombe County Department of Health, Asheville, North Carolina, USA (S.E. Morrison)

Cite This Article

Abstract

During an investigation of an outbreak of gastroenteritis caused by Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi B variant L(+) tartrate(+), we identified unpasteurized tempeh as a novel food vehicle and Rhizopus spp. starter culture as the source of the contamination. Safe handling of uncooked, unpasteurized tempeh should be emphasized for prevention of foodborne illnesses.

Infections with Salmonella spp., a leading cause of hospitalizations and death among persons with foodborne illness in the United States, are most often associated with contaminated poultry or eggs (1,2). S. enterica serovar Paratyphi B variant L(+) tartrate(+) (formerly Salmonella var. Java) accounted for 1.1% of Salmonella infections reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in 2009 (3). We investigated an outbreak of gastroenteritis caused by S. enterica ser. Paratyphi B var. L(+) tartrate(+) in North Carolina, USA, and found that the infections were associated with contaminated Rhizopus spp. starter culture and unpasteurized tempeh, a meat substitute, as a novel food vehicle.

The Study

On March 30, 2012, a local health department notified the North Carolina Division of Public Health (NCDPH) of 5 persons who had laboratory-confirmed infection with S. enterica ser. Paratyphi B var. L(+) tartrate(+) and 3 epidemiologically linked persons who also had gastroenteritis. All 8 ill persons ate or worked at the same restaurant in Buncombe County, North Carolina; 5 (63%) were food handlers. Patient interviews did not identify a common source or vehicle for the infection. On April 24, NCDPH was notified of 10 additional persons with laboratory-confirmed S. enterica ser. Paratyphi B var. L(+) tartrate(+) infection; all had visited or resided in Buncombe County during the infection’s incubation period.

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) patterns of isolates from all 15 laboratory-confirmed case-patients were indistinguishable and represented a pattern not previously reported to the national database of enteric PFGE patterns, PulseNet, coordinated by CDC (www.cdc.gov/pulsenet; outbreak strain identification Xba1 JKXX01.1228). NCDPH initiated an investigation to determine the extent of the outbreak, identify the transmission source, and implement control measures.

A confirmed case was defined as laboratory identification of the outbreak strain from a person’s clinical specimen, regardless of illness onset date or exposure location. A probable case was defined as gastroenteritis in a person epidemiologically linked to a confirmed case. Passive reporting was enhanced through media reports and provider alerts. Active case finding was performed by hospital-based public health epidemiologists. Patients were interviewed by using the standard NCDPH salmonellosis reporting form to assess clinical symptoms; travel history; and food, water, and animal exposures.

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Cases of Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi B variant L(+) tartrate(+) gastroenteritis, by date of symptom onset, North Carolina, USA, February 29–May 8, 2012. For comparison, the date that the manufacturer of Brand A tempeh changed Rhizopus spp. starter culture vendors and dates of public notifications and recalls are indicated.

Figure 1. . . Cases of Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi B variant L(+) tartrate(+) gastroenteritis, by date of symptom onset, North Carolina, USA, February 29–May 8, 2012. For comparison, the date that the...

A total of 89 cases (87 confirmed, 2 probable) were identified among residents of 5 states; illness onset dates were February 29–May 8, 2012 (Figure 1). Of the 89 case-patients, 81 were residents of North Carolina; 80 reported travel to or residence in Buncombe County during the incubation period. Ten self-identified as food service workers, 2 as health care providers, and 39 as students of or visitors to University A, located in Buncombe County. All 86 patients for whom data were available experienced diarrhea (>3 loose stools in a 24-hour period; median duration 7 days, range 2–24); 30 (37%) of 82 reported bloody diarrhea (denominator reflects the number of case-patients who responded to the question). Eighty-three patients sought medical care; 8 were hospitalized; and none died (Table).

Consumption of vegetarian cuisine was commonly reported by case-patients. Because meat substitutes (e.g., tofu and tempeh) were not included on the standard reporting form, an outbreak-specific questionnaire was designed to gather more detailed exposure history. The first 50 patients identified received this questionnaire; 41 (82%) responded. Of these, 18 (44%) indicated that they had eaten tempeh, a fermented bean product that is usually pasteurized and cooked before consumption. Of these 18 patients, 12 had eaten tempeh at a restaurant, 4 had eaten it at University A, and 2 had sampled it at a grocery store. Two of the 18 persons who consumed tempeh also regularly handled it at a restaurant.

Site visits were conducted at the 3 restaurants most frequently identified in patient interviews (12%–40% of patient reports). Interviews with managerial staff and observation of food preparation identified multiple opportunities for cross-contamination, including preparation of uncooked, unpasteurized tempeh on the same surfaces used to prepare ready-to-eat (RTE) foods; failure to perform handwashing after handling uncooked tempeh; and bare-hand contact with RTE foods.

On April 26, the North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (NCDA&CS) notified NCDPH that salmonellae had been presumptively identified from samples of Brand A tempeh, which had been collected for routine food product testing before this outbreak was reported. Brand A produced unpasteurized tempeh in Buncombe County and distributed it to 34 restaurants in North Carolina. Additional distribution sites included grocery stores in several southeastern states and University A’s cafeteria. All 41 case-patients who completed the outbreak-specific questionnaire had eaten at a restaurant or venue that served Brand A tempeh. No cases were linked to grocery stores outside North Carolina.

NCDA&CS and NCDPH visited Brand A tempeh’s production facility to interview staff, review tempeh production, and obtain food samples. Of 6 employees, none reported recent illness or international travel. Production of the tempeh began in October 2009 and involved combining beans (e.g., soybeans, black beans, or black-eyed peas), vinegar, and Rhizopus spp. starter culture. The starter culture was added after cooking; the bean product was then fermented until it formed a dense cake, and the unpasteurized product was packaged, frozen, and shipped.

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Pulse-field gel electrophoresis dendrogram showing Xba1 enzyme band patterns for 8 case-patients, tempeh, and Rhizopus spp. starter culture associated with outbreak of Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi B variant L(+) tartrate(+) gastroenteritis, by date of symptom onset, North Carolina, USA, 2012.

Figure 2. . . Pulse-field gel electrophoresis dendrogram showing Xba1 enzyme band patterns for 8 case-patients, tempeh, and Rhizopus spp. starter culture associated with outbreak of Salmonella enterica serovar Paratyphi B variant L(+)...

Product testing revealed that Brand A tempeh was contaminated with S. enterica ser. Paratyphi B var. L(+) tartrate(+) that had a PFGE pattern matching the outbreak strain. Salmonella spp. were not recovered from raw soybeans or black-eyed peas, black beans were unavailable for sampling, and vinegar was not tested, but the outbreak strain was identified in opened and unopened bags of Rhizopus spp. starter culture (Figure 2).

The makers of Brand A tempeh switched Rhizopus spp. vendors in January 2012 and began using the new culture on January 24. The new Rhizopus spp. culture was produced in Indonesia and distributed internationally. Brand A tempeh was recalled voluntarily on April 30, 2012 (4). The Rhizopus spp. culture was recalled voluntarily, domestically and internationally, on May 22, 2012 (5).

Conclusions

An outbreak of 89 cases of gastroenteritis related to infection with S. enterica ser. Paratyphi B var. L(+) tartrate(+) occurred in North Carolina during February–May 2012. The outbreak source was a Rhizopus spp. culture used in Brand A tempeh, which then acted as a novel vehicle for spreading salmonellae to consumers, probably through cross-contamination of RTE foods.

NCDPH confirmed the association between illness and Brand A tempeh through patient interviews and laboratory testing. The contaminated starter culture was distributed internationally; it is unclear why cases related to other tempeh brands did not occur, but a hypothesis is that, unlike other commercial tempeh products, Brand A tempeh is unpasteurized, and thus pathogens remained in the finished product.

The role of cross-contamination in foodborne outbreaks is well established (611). Bacteria can be transferred from surfaces to food products hours after surface contamination (6,7,9). RTE foods typically do not include a heating or cooking step to kill pathogens; consequently, raw vegetables and salads are commonly associated with foodborne outbreaks caused by cross-contamination (7,1012). In this outbreak, all case-patients who responded to an outbreak-specific questionnaire reported eating at a venue that served Brand A tempeh. Although fewer than half recalled eating or handling tempeh, other case-patients might have been exposed during handling or consumption of cross-contaminated RTE foods.

Control measures addressing bare-hand contact with RTE foods, sanitation of food contact surfaces, and separation of raw and RTE foods were provided to restaurants that received Brand A tempeh and to the local Independent Restaurant Association. Correct handling of raw, unpasteurized tempeh was emphasized. Although tempeh can be part of a healthy diet (13), public health considerations should focus on safe handling of unpasteurized tempeh to prevent illness.

Dr Griese is an Epidemic Intelligence Service Officer with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta. She is assigned to the North Carolina Division of Public Health, where she responds to infectious disease outbreaks and public health threats.

Top

Acknowledgment

We thank the Buncombe County Health Department, especially Gibbie Harris, Jennifer Mullendore, Ellis Vaughan, Susan Creede, David Mease, Marc Fowler, and Gaylen Ehrlichman, for their excellent management of a prolonged outbreak; our liaisons with the North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, Joan Sims, Janna Spruill, and Jim Melvin, for their collaboration; and the North Carolina Division of Public Health, particularly Evelyn Foust, Julie Casani, Lorri Taylor, Kathy Dail, Lana Deyneka, Nicole Lee, Susan Thompson, Carl Williams, Phyllis Rocco, Sandy Pace, Rob Pace, Samuel Merritt, Shermalyn Greene, Cami Hartley, Robbie Hall, Christy Spratt, and Kim Pruess, for their tireless efforts during an ongoing public health investigation. We are especially indebted to the network of hospital-based public health epidemiologists and the local health department communicable disease nurses who helped investigate each case.

Top

References

  1. Scallan  E, Hoekstra  RM, Angulo  FJ, Tauxe  RV, Widdowson  MA, Roy  SL, Foodborne illness acquired in the United States—major pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:715 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Surveillance for foodborne disease outbreaks—United States, 2008. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60:1197202 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Salmonella surveillance annual data summary, 2009. Atlanta: The Centers; 2011.
  4. North Carolina Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services, Public Affairs Division. Asheville company recalls tempeh after tests detect presence of Salmonella. Raleigh (NC): The Department; 2012 [cited 2013 Jan 23]. http://www.ncagr.gov/paffairs/release/2012/4-12tempehrecall.htm
  5. Food and Drug Administration. IndonesianFoodMart.com recalls “tempeh starter yeast” because of health risk of Salmonella. Silver Spring (MD): The Administration; 2012 [cited 2013 Jan 23]. http://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm305247.htm
  6. Kusumaningrum  HD, van Asselt  ED, Beumer  RR, Zwietering  MH. A quantitative analysis of cross-contamination of Salmonella and Campylobacter spp. via domestic kitchen surfaces. J Food Prot. 2004;67:1892903 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Moore  CM, Sheldon  BW, Jaykus  LA. Transfer of Salmonella and Campylobacter from stainless steel to romaine lettuce. J Food Prot. 2003;66:22316 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. De Cesare  A, Sheldon  BW, Smith  KS, Jaykus  LA. Survival and persistence of Campylobacter and Salmonella species under various organic loads on food contact surfaces. J Food Prot. 2003;66:158794 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kusumaningrum  HD, Riboldi  G, Hazeleger  WC, Beumer  RR. Survival of foodborne pathogens on stainless steel surfaces and cross-contamination to foods. Int J Food Microbiol. 2003;85:22736. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Little  CL, Gillespie  IA. Prepared salads and public health. J Appl Microbiol. 2008;105:172943. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Todd  ECD, Greig  JD, Bartleson  CA, Michaels  BS. Outbreaks where food workers have been implicated in the spread of foodborne disease. Part 3: factors contributing to outbreaks and description of outbreak categories. J Food Prot. 2007;70:2199217 .PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Beuchat  LR, Ryu  JH. Produce handling and processing practices. Emerg Infect Dis. 1997;3:45965. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Sacks  FM, Lichtenstein  A, Van Horn  L, Harris  W, Kris-Etherton  P, Winston  M, Soy protein, isoflavones, and cardiovascular health: an American Heart Association Science Advisory for professionals from the Nutrition Committee. Circulation. 2006;113:103444 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures
Table

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1909.130334

Table of Contents – Volume 19, Number 9—September 2013

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Stephanie Griese, North Carolina Division of Public Health, 1902 Mail Service Center, Raleigh, NC 27699-1902, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: August 14, 2013
Page updated: August 20, 2013
Page reviewed: August 20, 2013
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external