Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 21, Number 1—January 2015
Letter

Genome Sequence of Enterovirus D68 from St. Louis, Missouri, USA

Kristine M. WylieComments to Author , Todd N. Wylie, Anthony Orvedahl, Richard S. Buller, Brandi N. Herter, Vincent Magrini, Richard K. Wilson, and Gregory A. Storch
Author affiliations: Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

Main Article

Figure

Phylogenetic comparison of enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) obtained from St. Louis, Missouri, USA, in 2014, with other sequenced strains. The phylogenetic relationships of genome sequences (nucleotides) were estimated by using the maximum-likelihood method with RAxML (http://www.viprbrc.org) bootstrapped 100 times. A) Comparison of genome sequences for full-length and nearly full-length strains. B) Comparison of virus protein 1 sequences. Sequences were downloaded from ViPR (http://www.viprbrc.org) and

Figure. Phylogenetic comparison of enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) obtained from St. Louis, Missouri, USA, in 2014, with other sequenced strains. The phylogenetic relationships of genome sequences (nucleotides) were estimated by using the maximum-likelihood method with RAxML (http://www.viprbrc.org) bootstrapped 100 times. A) Comparison of genome sequences for full-length and nearly full-length strains. B) Comparison of virus protein 1 sequences. Sequences were downloaded from ViPR (http://www.viprbrc.org) and supplemented with strains from the 2014 EV-D68 season. Sequences were clustered at 99% identity to obtain a representative set of sequences, which are shown. Bootstrap values are indicated on each tree. The strain from St. Louis is indicated by an asterisk on each tree. Scale bars indicate nucleotide substitutions per site.

Main Article

Page created: December 19, 2014
Page updated: December 19, 2014
Page reviewed: December 19, 2014
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external