Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 22, Number 10—October 2016
Dispatch

Streptococcus suis Serotype 2 Capsule In Vivo

Figures
Tables
Article Metrics
11
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Author affiliations: Université de Montréal, St-Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada (J.-P. Auger, M. Gottschalk); The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan (N. Meekhanon, T. Sekizaki); Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand (N. Meekhanon); National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Tsukuba, Japan (M. Okura, M. Osaki, D. Takamatsu); Gifu University, Gifu, Japan (D. Takamatsu)

Cite This Article

Abstract

Many Streptococcus suis isolates from porcine endocarditis in slaughterhouses have lost their capsule and are considered avirulent. However, we retrieved capsule- and virulence-recovered S. suis after in vivo passages of a nonencapsulated strain in mice, suggesting that nonencapsulated S. suis are still potentially hazardous for persons in the swine industry.

Streptococcus suis is a gram-positive bacterium that infects pigs and causes severe economic losses to the swine industry. Moreover, it causes severe disease in persons in close contact with diseased pigs or their products (1). In Japan, S. suis has been frequently isolated from pigs with endocarditis in slaughterhouses; most of the isolates were expected to be sequence types (STs) that are potentially hazardous to humans (2). Many isolates from porcine endocarditis lost their capsule, and all the nonencapsulated isolates analyzed had mutations in the capsular polysaccharide synthesis (cps) genes (3,4). The capsule of S. suis is a major virulence factor (1). Although loss of the capsule gives S. suis some benefit in causing endocarditis by enhancing the ability of bacterial cells to adhere to porcine and human platelets, a major virulence determinant for infective endocarditis (3), nonencapsulated S. suis are generally considered avirulent (5). However, whether nonencapsulated S. suis lurking in porcine endocarditis poses a threat to persons working in the swine industry is unknown. To investigate whether nonencapsulated S. suis can restore the ability to express the capsule and become virulent again, we repeated in vitro or in vivo passages of nonencapsulated S. suis and attempted to retrieve capsule-recovered strains.

The Study

For the in vitro passages, we used 29 S. suis strains isolated from pigs with endocarditis. These isolates had the cps gene cluster of serotype 2 but had lost their capsule because of mutations in the cps genes (Table). We subcultured them twice in liquid media and separated the cells according to the buoyant density by Percoll density gradient centrifugation (Technical Appendix). Because encapsulated cells show lower density than nonencapsulated cells (6,7), we investigated capsular expression of S. suis cells with low density by coagglutination tests using serotype 2 antiserum (Technical Appendix). The retrieved S. suis was also used for the next subcultures. We repeated 4 cycles of this experiment (in total 8 subcultures) but obtained no encapsulated S. suis from any of the strains tested.

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Capsule recovery of Streptococcus suis strain NL119 in vivo. A) The genetic organization of the S. suis serotype 2 capsular polysaccharide synthesis (cps) gene cluster and mutations observed in isolate NL119 and strains retrieved from NL119-infected mice after each in vivo passage (NL119 P1–P4; DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank accession nos. LC147077, LC147078, LC147079, LC147080, and LC077855, respectively). Gray arrows indicate genes putatively involved in capsule synthesis; open arrows indicate

Figure 1. Capsule recovery of Streptococcus suis strain NL119 in vivo. A) The genetic organization of the S. suis serotype 2 capsular polysaccharide synthesis (cps) gene cluster and mutations observed in isolate NL119...

Although these results suggested that mutations in cps genes are not repaired easily, the conditions faced by S. suis in vivo could influence capsular expression. To investigate this possibility, we selected strain NL119 as a representative. NL119 is an ST1 strain, one of the types hazardous to humans, but one that has lost the capsule because of a point mutation that occurred at nt 490 (T490C, Cys164Arg) of a glycosyltransferase gene (cps2F) (Table; Figure 1, panel A) (4). We inoculated groups of 5 mice with 5 × 108 CFU of NL119 (online Technical Appendix). Bacteria persistent in mice were retrieved 36 h after infection from the blood, in which capsular expression works favorably for survival. We investigated capsular expression of the retrieved NL119 by coagglutination tests and used the colony giving the strongest reaction within 30 s for the subsequent in vivo passage.

As expected, the coagglutination test of the parental strain NL119 showed a negative result. Similarly, NL119 after the first and second passages (NL119 P1 and P2, respectively) reacted weakly, comparable to those of the parental strain, suggesting poor encapsulation. Meanwhile, NL119 after the third and fourth passages (NL119 P3 and P4, respectively) reacted strongly, suggesting recovery of the capsule. To confirm this finding, we further analyzed formalin-killed bacteria by dot-ELISA using monoclonal antibody Z3, which reacts with the sialic acid moiety of the serotype 2 capsule (8), and an anti–S. suis serotype 2 serum adsorbed with parental strain NL119 to select the capsule-specific antibodies (Technical Appendix). In accordance with the coagglutination test, NL119 P1 and P2 gave weak reactions similar to those of NL119, whereas strong signals were detected in NL119 P3 and P4 with both the monoclonal antibody and serum (Figure 1, panels B, C). Because NL119 P1–P4 were also ST1 as determined by multilocus sequence typing, these results suggested that NL119 had recovered the capsule during passages in animals.

To find mutations that had contributed to the capsule recovery, we sequenced the cps2F gene of NL119 P1–P4. Although the cytosine residue at nt 490 was not changed in comparison with the parental strain, we found a further missense mutation at nt 491 (G491C, Arg164Pro) of the cps2F gene in NL119 P3 and P4 (Figure 1, panel A). To investigate whether this mutation was involved in the capsule recovery, we cloned cps2F of NL119 P4 into a gene expression vector pMX1 (9) and introduced it into the parental strain NL119 (Technical Appendix). A coagglutination test using serotype 2 antiserum showed positive reactions in all transformants tested, demonstrating that the further missense mutation restored the function of cps2F, resulting in capsule recovery of NL119 P3 and P4, although how the Cps2F function was recovered by the amino acid substitution is unknown. Isolation of the capsule-recovered strains in vivo could have been the consequence of selection of encapsulated cells, which were already present as a subpopulation in the original nonencapsulated NL119 population, by resisting host immunity including phagocytosis. However, because NL119 was a nonencapsulated strain originally recovered from a single colony and well-isolated by repeated passages in vitro, and no encapsulated subpopulation was ever retrieved in vitro by the selection using Percoll density gradient centrifugation, the most plausible hypothesis would be that the capsule-recovered S. suis was generated in vivo.

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Virulence of nonencapsulated Streptococcus suis strain NL119 and capsule-recovered NL119 P4 in mice. A) Survival of C57BL/6 mice (n = 10 mice per strain; until 14 days after infection) inoculated intraperitoneally with 5 × 107 CFU of either NL119 or NL119 P4. B) Blood bacterial burden at 24 h after infection. Data of individual mice are presented as log10 CFU/mL with the geometric mean. Asterisks indicate a significant difference between NL119 and NL119 P4 (p<0.05).

Figure 2. Virulence of nonencapsulated Streptococcus suis strain NL119 and capsule-recovered NL119 P4 in mice. A) Survival of C57BL/6 mice (n = 10 mice per strain; until 14 days after infection) inoculated intraperitoneally...

To evaluate whether the capsule-recovered S. suis isolate also recovered its virulence, we infected mice with either NL119 or NL119 P4 (online Technical Appendix). Rates of death differed significantly (p<0.05): 50% death in the NL119 P4-infected mice 14 days after infection, compared with 0% for the nonencapsulated NL119 (Figure 2, panel A). Recovery of the capsule also significantly increased its survival in blood 24 h after infection (p<0.05). All but 1 surviving NL119 P4-infected mice had significant blood bacterial titers (>5 × 103 CFU/mL; geometric mean 104 CFU/mL). In contrast, except for 1 mouse, all mice infected with NL119 had blood bacterial titers <104 CFU/mL (geometric mean 102 CFU/mL) (Figure 2, panel B).

Conclusions

Although capsule loss might contribute to S. suis infection by enhancing bacterial adherence to host cells and biofilm formation (3,1012), capsule loss makes S. suis cells susceptible to phagocytosis; therefore, the virulence of nonencapsulated mutants was attenuated when evaluated in animal models (5). In accordance with previous studies, nonencapsulated NL119 was avirulent. However, NL119 P4, which recovered its capsule in vivo, also recovered virulence. Because various mutations in cps genes, including large deletions and insertions, cause capsule loss in S. suis (3,4), not all mutations will be repaired like NL119. However, our results demonstrated the presence of a nonencapsulated mutant, which can recover the capsule and virulence in vivo. Hence, nonencapsulated S. suis strains can cause severe diseases to the next hosts by recovering the capsule, which indicates that some nonencapsulated S. suis lurking in pigs with endocarditis are still potentially hazardous to persons handling such pigs and their products. Further investigations using a variety of naturally occurring and laboratory-derived mutants are needed for a comprehensive understanding of the biological significance and mechanisms of this phenomenon.

Mr. Auger is a doctoral student at the Research Group on Infectious Diseases of Swine at the Université de Montréal in St-Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada. His primary research interest is the host response to pathogens.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank Sonia Lacouture for excellent technical assistance.

This work was financially supported by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI grant no. 26870840 to M.O.; JSPS KAKENHI grant nos. 23580420, 26660226, and 15H02651 to T.S.; and Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) 04435 to M.G.

Top

References

  1. Gottschalk  M. Streptococcosis. In: Zimmerman JJ, Karriker LA, Ramirez A, Schwartz KJ, Stevenson GW, editors. Diseases of swine, 10th ed. Ames (IA): John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2012. p. 841–55.
  2. Onishi  H, Sugawara  M, Okura  M, Osaki  M, Takamatsu  D. Prevalence of Streptococcus suis genotypes in isolates from porcine endocarditis in East Japan. J Vet Med Sci. 2012;74:16814.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Lakkitjaroen  N, Takamatsu  D, Okura  M, Sato  M, Osaki  M, Sekizaki  T. Loss of capsule among Streptococcus suis isolates from porcine endocarditis and its biological significance. J Med Microbiol. 2011;60:166976.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Lakkitjaroen  N, Takamatsu  D, Okura  M, Sato  M, Osaki  M, Sekizaki  T. Capsule loss or death: the position of mutations among capsule genes sways the destiny of Streptococcus suis. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2014;354:4654.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Fittipaldi  N, Segura  M, Grenier  D, Gottschalk  M. Virulence factors involved in the pathogenesis of the infection caused by the swine pathogen and zoonotic agent Streptococcus suis. Future Microbiol. 2012;7:25979.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Håkansson  S, Bergholm  A-M, Holm  SE, Wagner  B, Wagner  M. Properties of high and low density subpopulations of group B streptococci: enhanced virulence of the low density variant. Microb Pathog. 1988;5:34555.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Patrick  S, Reid  JH. Separation of capsulate and non-capsulate Bacteroides fragilis on a discontinuous density gradient. J Med Microbiol. 1983;16:23941.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Charland  N, Jacques  M, Lacouture  S, Gottschalk  M. Characterization and protective activity of a monoclonal antibody against a capsular epitope shared by Streptococcus suis serotypes 1, 2 and 1/2. Microbiology. 1997;143:360714.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Okura  M, Osaki  M, Fittipaldi  N, Gottschalk  M, Sekizaki  T, Takamatsu  D. The minor pilin subunit Sgp2 is necessary for assembly of the pilus encoded by the srtG cluster of Streptococcus suis. J Bacteriol. 2011;193:82231.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Benga  L, Goethe  R, Rohde  M, Valentin-Weigand  P. Non-encapsulated strains reveal novel insights in invasion and survival of Streptococcus suis in epithelial cells. Cell Microbiol. 2004;6:86781.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bonifait  L, Gottschalk  M, Grenier  D. Cell surface characteristics of nontypeable isolates of Streptococcus suis. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2010;311:1606.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Tanabe  S, Bonifait  L, Fittipaldi  N, Grignon  L, Gottschalk  M, Grenier  D. Pleiotropic effects of polysaccharide capsule loss on selected biological properties of Streptococcus suis. Can J Vet Res. 2010;74:6570.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures
Table

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2210.151640

1These authors contributed equally to this article.

Table of Contents – Volume 22, Number 10—October 2016

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Daisuke Takamatsu, Division of Bacterial and Parasitic Diseases, National Institute of Animal Health, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, 3-1-5 Kannondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0856, Japan

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: July 11, 2017
Page updated: July 11, 2017
Page reviewed: July 11, 2017
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external