Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 22, Number 6—June 2016
Dispatch

Experimental Infection and Response to Rechallenge of Alpacas with Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus

Gary Crameri, Peter A. DurrComments to Author , Reuben Klein, Adam Foord, Meng Yu, Sarah Riddell, Jessica Haining, Dayna Johnson, Maged G. Hemida, Jennifer Barr, Myoung-don Oh, Deborah Middleton, and Lin-Fa Wang
Author affiliations: CSIRO Australian Animal Health Laboratory, Geelong, Victoria, Australia (G. Crameri, P.A. Durr, R. Klein, A. Foord, M. Yu, S. Riddell, J. Haining, D. Johnson, J. Barr, D. Middleton); Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr Elsheikh, Egypt (M.G. Hemida); King Faisal University, Hofuf, Saudi Arabia (M.G. Hemida); University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (M. Peiris); Duke–National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore (L.-F. Wang)

Main Article

Table 1

Virus shedding in 3 alpacas infected with MERS-Cov, as measured by virus isolation and real-time PCR for each sample day*

Dpi Cycle threshold value (virus isolation result)†‡
No. positive/no. tested
Deep nasal swab sample
Oral swab sample
Superficial nasal swab sample
Alpaca 
1 Alpaca 2 Alpaca 
3 Alpaca 
1 Alpaca 
2 Alpaca 
3 Alpaca 
1 Alpaca 
2 Alpaca 
3 Real-time PCR Virus isolation
0 U (–) U (–) U (–) U (–) 40.8 (–) U (–) U (–) U (–) U (–) 0/3 0/3
3 33.4 (+) 29.0 (–) U (–) 34.2 (–) 31.7 (–) 42.3 (–) 35.4 (–) 40.7 (–) U (–) 2/3 1/3
5 34.9 (–) 33.5 (–) 34.2 (–) 32.0 (–) 35.4 (–) 32.0 (+) 35.0 (–) 33.0 (–) 32.5 (–) 3/3 1/3
7 29.4 (+) 18.2 (–) 31.4 (+) 32.7 (–) 30.1 (+) 28.3 (+) 31.9 (–) 28.5 (+) 38.6 (+) 3/3 3/3
10 41.0 (–) 37.5 (+) U (–) 41.3 (–) 38.0 (–) 30.5 (+) 39.9 (–) 36.0 (+) U (–) 3/3 2/3
12 42.0 (–) 36.4 (–) U (–) U (–) U (–) 37.3 (+) 42.0 (–) 39.5 (+) U (–) 2/3 2/3
14 U (–) 42.2 (–) U (–) 43.0 (–) 44.0 (–) 43.0 (–) U (–) U (–) U (–) 0/3 0/3
21 U (–) U (–) U (–) U (–) U (–) U (–) U (–) U (–) U (–) 0/3 0/3
24 U (–) U (–) U (–) 40.8 (–) U (–) U (–) U (–) 43.2 (–) U (–) 0/3 0/3
26 U (–) U (–) U (–) U (–) U (–) U (–) U (–) U (–) U (–) 0/3 0/3
28 U (–) U (–) U (–) U (–) U (–) U (–) U (–) U (–) U (–) 0/3 0/3
31 U (–) U (–) U (–) U (–) U (–) U (–) U (–) U (–) U (–) 0/3 0/3
33 U (–) U (–) U (–) U (–) U (–) U (–) U (–) 43.1 (–) U (–) 0/3 0/3
35§ U (–) NA U (–) U (–) NA U (–) U (–) NA U (–) 0/2 0/2

*Bold indicates positive results (cycle threshold <40). Gray shading indicates that >1 animal was positive for the sample collected on that day. Dpi, day postinfection for challenge (initial infection); MERS-CoV, Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus; NA, not available; U, undetermined; –, negative; +, positive.
†Real-time PCR cycle threshold values are an average of the duplicates, except when 1 result was undetermined; then, only the single numeric value is shown.
‡The starting dilution was 1:10; the threshold for a positive result was a dilution of >1:20.
§Alpaca 2 was euthanized at day 33, leaving only 2 animals in the study at day 35.

Main Article

Page created: May 16, 2016
Page updated: May 16, 2016
Page reviewed: May 16, 2016
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external