Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 22, Number 7—July 2016
Letter

Colistin-Resistant mcr-1–Positive Pathogenic Escherichia coli in Swine, Japan, 2007−2014

Cite This Article

To the Editor: Colistin is an old-generation antimicrobial agent; however, because it is one of the few agents that remain effective against multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacteria (e.g., carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae), its clinical usefulness is being increasingly recognized (1). Previous reports have described the mechanisms of colistin resistance (2) as being chromosomally mediated and not associated with horizontal gene transfer. However, from 2011 through 2014, a plasmid-encoded colistin-resistance gene, mcr-1, was identified in colistin-resistant Escherichia coli isolated in China, particularly from animals. Specifically, mcr-1–positive isolates were found in 21% of healthy swine at slaughter, 15% of marketed pork and chicken meat, and 1% of hospitalized human patients (3). A study of E. coli isolated from healthy cattle, swine, and chickens in Japan during 2000–2014 found only 2 (0.02%) of 9,308 isolates positive for mcr-1 (4). We report the rates at which mcr-1 was detected in our stored collection of E. coli isolates from diseased swine (swine with diarrhea or edema disease), hereafter referred to as swine-pathogenic E. coli.

We recently analyzed swine-pathogenic E. coli strains isolated from diseased swine throughout Japan during 1991–2014 (5). We analyzed all swine disease-associated E. coli strains isolated from the 23 Livestock Hygiene Service Centers in Japan (including prefectures that covered 75% of total swine production in Japan in 2014) and sent to the National Institute of Animal Health for diagnostic purposes during 1991–2014. Among the 967 strains examined, 684 (71%) belonged to E. coli serogroup O139, O149, O116, or OSB9.

In the study reported here, we investigated these 684 strains for susceptibility to colistin and for mcr-1 carriage. The strains from the 4 predominant serogroups (Technical Appendix Table) can be considered representative of swine-pathogenic E. coli strains isolated from farm animals, but not food products, in Japan. MICs were determined by using the agar dilution method according to the recommendations of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (6). The presence of mcr-1 was detected by PCR (3).

Among the 684 strains examined, colistin MICs exhibited a bimodal distribution of 0.25–128 μg/mL and peaked at 0.5 and 16 μg/mL (Technical Appendix Figure). According to the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing criterion (7), in which isolates with an MIC of >4 μg/mL are considered colistin resistant, 309 (45%) of the 684 strains were classified as colistin resistant. The gene mcr-1 was detected in 90 (13%) strains, and the MICs for these mcr-1–positive strains ranged from 8 to 128 μg/mL (Technical Appendix Figure). Among the 309 colistin-resistant strains, mcr-1–positive and mcr-1–negative isolates had the same 50% and 90% MICs, 16 and 32 μg/mL, respectively. These results indicate that a high proportion of swine-pathogenic E. coli in Japan are resistant to colistin, that mcr-1 has already been widely disseminated among these strains, and that the level of colistin resistance mediated by mcr-1 is similar to that mediated by mcr-1–independent mechanisms.

Figure

Thumbnail of Changes in the numbers of colistin-susceptible and colistin-resistant Escherichia coli isolated from swine with diarrhea or edema disease, Japan, 2004–2014. The line shows the changes in proportion of mcr-1–positive isolates among the total isolates for each year.

Figure. Changes in the numbers of colistin-susceptible and colistin-resistant Escherichia coli isolated from swine with diarrhea or edema disease, Japan, 2004–2014. The line shows the changes in proportion of mcr-1–positive isolates among...

In 2004, colistin-resistant E. coli already represented 77% of the isolates, and the positivity rates varied from year to year (26%–82%) (Figure). First detection of mcr-1–positive strains was in 2007, and the proportion of mcr-1 positivity has risen, especially since 2009 (Figure). During 2013–2014, approximately half of the strains isolated were mcr-1 positive (Figure), and most colistin-resistant strains isolated during these 2 years carried mcr-1 (85% and 62% in 2013 and 2014, respectively). Of note, the rates of mcr-1–positive strains among the 4 serogroups isolated from 2010 through 2014 did not differ significantly (χ2 test): 22 (20%) of 110 in O139, 38 (38%) of 100 in O149, 19 (26%) of 73 in O116, and 6 (32%) of 19 in OSB9. This finding suggests that the sharp rise in the proportion of mcr-1–positive strains has been driven by plasmid-mediated horizontal gene transfer, not by the expansion of a specific clone.

In Japan, rates of isolation of colistin-resistant and mcr-1–positive E. coli strains from healthy animals are low, 1.00% and 0.02% of 9,308 strains examined, respectively (4). These low rates may be the result of the prudent use of colistin in Japan. During 2000–2007 in Japan, colistin use in swine did not increase significantly (8). However, our data show that mcr-1 has recently been disseminated among swine-pathogenic E. coli in Japan, which might be associated with the use of colistin to treat disease in swine. Although mcr-1–positive bacteria have not yet been isolated from humans in Japan (4), the sharp increase in swine-pathogenic E. coli in animal strains implies a risk for transmission of mcr-1 from these strains to human-pathogenic bacteria, a serious concern for human medicine. More active surveillance of mcr-1–positive colistin-resistant bacteria in human and animal environments is needed.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank Yuna Hikoda for technical assistance and all of the prefectural Livestock Hygiene Service Centers for providing E. coli isolates and strain information.

This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (category C), KAKENHI grant no. 15K08484 to M.K. from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, and a grant from the Research Program on Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases (no. 15fk0108021h0002) from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development.

Top

Masahiro KusumotoComments to Author , Yoshitoshi Ogura, Yasuhiro Gotoh, Taketoshi Iwata, Tetsuya Hayashi, and Masato Akiba
Author affiliations: National Institute of Animal Health, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, Ibaraki, Japan (M. Kusumoto, T. Iwata, M. Akiba); Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan (Y. Ogura, T. Hayashi); University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan (Y. Gotoh); Osaka Prefecture University, Osaka, Japan (M. Akiba)

Top

References

  1. Ruppé  E, Woerther  PL, Barbier  F. Mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in gram-negative bacilli. Ann Intensive Care. 2015;5:61. DOIGoogle Scholar
  2. Olaitan  AO, Morand  S, Rolain  JM. Mechanisms of polymyxin resistance: acquired and intrinsic resistance in bacteria. Front Microbiol. 2014;5:643. DOIGoogle Scholar
  3. Liu  YY, Wang  Y, Walsh  TR, Yi  LX, Zhang  R, Spencer  J, Emergence of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance mechanism MCR-1 in animals and human beings in China: a microbiological and molecular biological study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16:1618. DOIGoogle Scholar
  4. Suzuki  S, Ohnishi  M, Kawanishi  M, Akiba  M, Kuroda  M. Investigation of a plasmid genome database for colistin-resistance gene mcr-1. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16:2845. DOIGoogle Scholar
  5. Kusumoto  M, Hikoda  Y, Fujii  Y, Murata  M, Miyoshi  H, Ogura  Y, Emergence of a multidrug-resistant Shiga toxin-producing enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli lineage in diseased swine in Japan. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54:107481. DOIGoogle Scholar
  6. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: 24th informational supplement. Document M100–S24. Wayne (PA): The Institute; 2014.
  7. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 60 [cited 2016 Feb 6]. http://www.eucast.org/clinical_breakpoints/
  8. Koike  R, Asai  T, Ozawa  M, Ishikawa  H. The use of therapeutic antimicrobials for food-producing animals [in Japanese]. Ann Rep Natl Vet Assay Lab. 2009;45:30–3. Summary in English [cited 2016 Apr 6]. http://www.maff.go.jp/nval/kouhou/nenpo/no45/pdf/no45-040-043-p030-033-gaku-gi-3.pdf

Top

Figure

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2207.160234

Related Links

Top

Table of Contents – Volume 22, Number 7—July 2016

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Masahiro Kusumoto, Bacterial and Parasitic Disease Research Division, National Institute of Animal Health, National Agriculture and Food Research Organization, 3-1-5 Kannondai, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0856, Japan

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: June 14, 2016
Page updated: June 14, 2016
Page reviewed: June 14, 2016
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external