Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 23, Number 1—January 2017
Dispatch

Prolonged Detection of Zika Virus in Vaginal Secretions and Whole Blood

Author affiliations: Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA (K.O. Murray, R. Gorchakov, R. Berry, M.N. Garcia, A. Correa, S.M. Patel, K. Aagaard); Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston (K.O. Murray, R. Gorchakov, R. Berry, M.N. Garcia, A. Correa, S.M. Patel, K. Aagaard); Baylor St. Luke’s General Hospital, Houston (A.R. Carlson); Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA (L. Lai, M. Natrajan, M.J. Mulligan)

Cite This Article

Abstract

Infection with Zika virus is an emerging public health crisis. We observed prolonged detection of virus RNA in vaginal mucosal swab specimens and whole blood for a US traveler with acute Zika virus infection who had visited Honduras. These findings advance understanding of Zika virus infection and provide data for additional testing strategies.

Zika virus is a rapidly emerging mosquitoborne virus (1). In May 2015, Brazil reported autochthonous transmission of Zika virus (2). Over the course of 1 year, Zika virus spread to >50 countries and territories throughout the Americas (3). With the now confirmed link of Zika virus infection during pregnancy leading to fetal microcephaly (4) and reported cases transmitted by sexual contact (5), it is vital to understand the natural history of infection. We report an acute case of Zika virus infection in a traveler returning from Honduras to the United States and results from serial specimens collected for >11 weeks. These new data might serve as a potential guide for public health policy.

The Study

This study was reviewed and approved by the Baylor College of Medicine Institutional Review Board (H-30533). A previously healthy, nonpregnant, 26 year-old non-Hispanic white woman returned to the United States from Tegucigalpa, Honduras, during mid-May 2016. Five days after her return (day 0), signs and symptoms consistent with Zika virus infection developed, beginning with rash and subsequent fever, headache, and conjunctivitis (Table). Fever and rash continued through day 5 and day 6, respectively. By day 15, desquamation was noted on the palms of both hands and soles of both feet. By day 17, all symptoms had resolved.

Serial specimens were longitudinally collected for >11 weeks. The first specimens were collected on day 0, two hours after onset of rash and 2 h before development of fever. All remaining specimens were collected at 3, 8, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 53, 64, and 81 days after onset of illness. Specimens included serum, whole blood (EDTA anticoagulated), urine, saliva, and vaginal mucosa swabs. The patient was not menstruating when vaginal swab specimens were collected.

RNA was extracted from serum, whole blood, and urine samples by using the QIAamp MinElute Virus Spin Kit (QIAGEN, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Oral and vaginal mucosal swab specimens were collected by using the BBL CultureSwab Collection and Transport System (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA). Specimens were incubated in 250 μL of AL/carrier RNA lysis buffer for 10 min at room temperature; 200 μL of phosphate-buffered saline was added before RNA extraction.

Figure

Thumbnail of Quantitative reverse transcription PCR cycle threshold values over time (days after onset of illness) for whole blood, serum, urine, saliva, and vaginal mucosal swab specimens obtained from a 26-year-old woman infected with Zika virus who returned from Honduras to the United States. A cutoff value for a negative result was established at a cycle threshold of 40 (black horizontal line).

Figure. Quantitative reverse transcription PCR cycle threshold values over time (days after onset of illness) for whole blood, serum, urine, saliva, and vaginal mucosal swab specimens obtained from a 26-year-old woman infected...

Eluted RNA from all samples was tested in a quantitative reverse transcription quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) that included a TaqMan Fast Virus 1-Step Master Mix (ThermoFisher Scientific, Foster City, CA, USA) and a TaqMan ZIKV 1107 assay (6) with appropriate positive and negative controls. We detected Zika virus RNA in serum up to day 8 after onset of illness and in body fluids up to day 14; whole blood samples remained positive up to day 81 (Figure). Results of qRT-PCR of saliva were negative after day 8, and results for urine and vaginal swab specimens did not become negative until after day 14. We tested a day 0 serum sample for dengue virus and chikungunya virus RNA by using TaqMan assays (7,8); all results were negative.

Virus isolations were performed for Vero cells in complete Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium containing 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum. Cells were infected with day 0 serum samples (or mock-infected with cell culture medium) and observed for cytopathic effects. Cell culture supernatants were sampled 13 days after cell culture infection, and RNA was extracted and tested for Zika virus RNA. Supernatant was collected on day 14, and viral titer was 8.5 × 105 PFU/mL by plaque assay. Attempts to isolate virus from the day 64 erythrocyte fraction showed no evidence of cytopathic effects, and first and second passages were negative by qRT-PCR. Because the day 81 whole blood specimen was still positive by qRT-PCR, we used ficoll to separate peripheral blood mononuclear cells and erythrocytes and found that erythrocytes were the only fraction positive for Zika virus RNA. The partial sequence of the virus we isolated was submitted to GenBank under accession no. KX928077.

On day 8, plasma was evaluated by using an ELISA (9) to assess IgM and IgG binding to Zika virus envelope protein (Zika Virus Envelope Recombinant Protein, #R01635; Meridian Life Sciences, Memphis, TN, USA); positive results were obtained. Plasma-neutralizing antibodies against Zika virus were detected (50% focus reduction neutralization test titer 1:1,438), but neutralization of dengue virus serotypes 1–4 was not detected. These findings indicated a robust Zika virus–specific humoral response.

Conclusions

Given recent concerns regarding the ongoing epidemic of Zika virus disease, there is an urgent need to document the natural history of infection and assess transmission risk through nonvector routes. We had the unique opportunity to prospectively monitor the clinical and virologic course of Zika virus infection in a patient starting on day 0.

We detected viral shedding in vaginal secretions up to day 14. Only 1 human study reported Zika virus RNA in cervical mucous up to day 11 after onset of signs and symptoms (10). These findings are supported by recent results for 2 animal models. Zika virus (Asian lineage strain) RNA was detected in vaginal swab specimens obtained on days 1 and 7 postinfection of nonpregnant female rhesus macaques (11). Zika virus replication was also detected in vaginal mucosa of mice (12).

We could not determine whether positive results by qRT-PCR indicated replicating virus. With the recent finding of possible female-to-male virus transmission (5), infectious virus might be present in the vaginal canal and could serve as a risk for sexual or intrapartum transmission.

We detected viral RNA in serum up to 8 days and in whole blood up to 81 days after onset of illness. Diagnosis of infection currently relies mostly on PCR detection of Zika virus in serum. With concerns for Zika virus infection during pregnancy, screening of whole blood might be more sensitive in identifying infected patients, particularly if an asymptomatic patient has traveled from an area where exposure is a concern, had high-risk sexual contact, or is convalescing and PCR for a serum sample would probably yield a negative result.

Our observation is further supported by another recent study that found whole blood samples positive for Zika virus by PCR up to 2 months postinfection (13). In our study, we confirmed that a positive result was attributed to the erythrocyte component of whole blood, similar to what has been found in studies of West Nile virus (14,15). One study found that West Nile virus adheres to erythrocytes and could infect Vero cells (14). Although we did not observe infectious virus associated with erythrocyte positivity for Zika virus at day 64, this finding is still of concern and requires further investigation. Because the last whole blood sample collected on day 81 was positive for Zika virus RNA, follow-up testing will continue to define the longevity of viremia in whole blood.

In conclusion, this case study advances understanding of the natural history of Zika virus. It provides new findings, including detection of Zika virus RNA in vaginal secretions up to day 14 and in erythrocytes up to day 81, the longest reported duration of detection in this sample type. A desquamating rash developed on the hands and feet of the patient, which we presume was related to her infection. To our knowledge, this finding has not been previously described.

Additional studies involving larger cohorts of acutely ill Zika virus–infected patients tested over a longer period would solidify our understanding of the natural history of infection, duration of viral detection, and clinical outcomes. These studies will enable further development of evidence-based policies regarding diagnosis and clinical management of Zika virus–infected patients.

Dr. Murray is Associate Vice-Chair for Research and Associate Professor of Pediatric Tropical Medicine in the Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, TX, and serves as Assistant Dean of the National School of Tropical Medicine. Her research interests are vectorborne and zoonotic diseases.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank the study participant for her willingness to provide multiple specimens over an extended period. Without her willingness to contribute to science, this study would not have been possible. We also thank Jim Dunn and Jim Versalovic for guidance in developing and validating our Zika virus qRT-PCR, Robert Tesh and Scott Weaver for Zika virus–positive controls, and Yongxian Xu and Vidisha Singh for technical assistance.

This study was supported in part by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (R01AI091816-01) to K.O.M, Emory University School of Medicine discretionary funds to M.J.M., and the Georgia Research Alliance.

Top

References

  1. Hayes  EB. Zika virus outside Africa. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:134750.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Hennessey  M, Fischer  M, Staples  JE. Zika virus spreads to new areas—region of the Americas, May 2015–January 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65:558.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Pan American Health Organization. Update on Zika virus in the Americas [cited 2016 Aug 11]. http://www.paho.org/hq/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=11603&Itemid=41696&lang=en
  4. Mlakar  J, Korva  M, Tul  N, Popović  M, Poljšak-Prijatelj  M, Mraz  J, et al. Zika virus associated with microcephaly. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:9518.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brooks  JT, Friedman  A, Kachur  RE, LaFlam  M, Peters  PJ, Jamieson  DJ. Update: interim guidance for prevention of sexual transmission of Zika virus—United States, July 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65:7457.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lanciotti  RS, Kosoy  OL, Laven  JJ, Velez  JO, Lambert  AJ, Johnson  AJ, et al. Genetic and serologic properties of Zika virus associated with an epidemic, Yap State, Micronesia, 2007. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:12329.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gurukumar  KR, Priyadarshini  D, Patil  JA, Bhagat  A, Singh  A, Shah  PS, et al. Development of real time PCR for detection and quantitation of Dengue Viruses. Virol J. 2009;6:10.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Lanciotti  RS, Kosoy  OL, Laven  JJ, Panella  AJ, Velez  JO, Lambert  AJ, et al. Chikungunya virus in US travelers returning from India, 2006. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:7647.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Zhao  H, Fernandez  E, Dowd  KA, Speer  SD, Platt  DJ, Gorman  MJ, et al. Structural basis of Zika virus-specific antibody protection. Cell. 2016;166:101627.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Prisant  N, Bujan  L, Benichou  H, Hayot  PH, Pavili  L, Lurel  S, et al. Zika virus in the female genital tract. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16:10001.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Dudley  DM, Aliota  MT, Mohr  EL, Weiler  AM, Lehrer-Brey  G, Weisgrau  KL, et al. A rhesus macaque model of Asian-lineage Zika virus infection. Nat Commun. 2016;7:12204.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Yockey  LJ, Varela  L, Rakib  T, Khoury-Hanold  W, Fink  SL, Stutz  B, et al. Vaginal exposure to Zika virus during pregnancy leads to fetal brain infection. Cell. 2016;166:12471256.e4.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lustig  Y, Mendelson  E, Paran  N, Melamed  S, Schwartz  E. Detection of Zika virus RNA in whole blood of imported Zika virus disease cases up to 2 months after symptom onset, Israel, December 2015 to April 2016. Euro Surveill. 2016;21:30269.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Rios  M, Daniel  S, Chancey  C, Hewlett  IK, Stramer  SL. West Nile virus adheres to human red blood cells in whole blood. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;45:1816.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lanteri  MC, Lee  TH, Wen  L, Kaidarova  Z, Bravo  MD, Kiely  NE, et al. West Nile virus nucleic acid persistence in whole blood months after clearance in plasma: implication for transfusion and transplantation safety. Transfusion. 2014;54:323241.DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figure
Table

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2301.161394

Table of Contents – Volume 23, Number 1—January 2017

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Kristy O. Murray, National School of Tropical Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, 1102 Bates St, Ste 550, Houston, TX 77030, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: December 14, 2016
Page updated: December 14, 2016
Page reviewed: December 14, 2016
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external