Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 9, Number 1—January 2003
Research

Two Epidemiologic Patterns of Norovirus Outbreaks: Surveillance in England and Wales, 1992–2000

Ben Lopman*Comments to Author , Goutam K Adak*, Mark Reacher*, and David W.G. Brown*
Author affiliations: *Public Health Laboratory Service, London, United Kingdom

Main Article

Table 2

Microbiologic and statistical evidence of foods implicated in outbreaks of Norovirus, England and Wales

Implicated food Microbiologic evidence Cohort study Case-control study Any evidence Total no. of outbreaks in which food vehicle implicated
Oysters
5 (25%)a
9 (45%)
0
14(70%)
20
Poultry
0
6 (67%)
0
6 (67%)
9
Meat
0
3 (60%)
0
3 (60%)
5
Fish
0
3 (50%)
1 (16%)
4 (67%)
6
Salads and vegetables
0
10 (59%)
3 (18%)
13 (76%)
17
Other items
0
16 (55%)
3 (10%)
19 (65%)
29
Total 5 (6%) 47 (55%) 7 (8%) 59 (68%) 86

aPercentages represent outbreaks with evidence per total outbreaks where food vehicle was implicated.

Main Article

Appendix: Surveillance and analysis definitions

Outbreak: an incident in which two or more people, thought to have a common exposure, experience a similar illness or proven infection, at least one of them being ill (22).
General outbreak: an outbreak that affects members of more than one household, or residents of an institution (36).
General outbreak of Norovirus: a general outbreak in which Norovirus is determined to be the causative agent by electron microscopy, RT-PCR, or enzyme immunoassay in one or more affected persons.
Residential facilities: includes residential homes, which provide some assistance in day-to-day living, and nursing homes, which provide care for persons whose infirmity or illness requires nursing care on a regular basis.
Food outlets: commercial food retailers including restaurants, pubs, bars, cafeterias, mobile food vendors, and caterers.

Page created: December 07, 2010
Page updated: December 07, 2010
Page reviewed: December 07, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external