Volume 10, Number 12—December 2004
Origin of the Amphibian Chytrid Fungus
The sudden appearance of chytridiomycosis, the cause of amphibian deaths and population declines in several continents, suggests that its etiologic agent, the amphibian chytrid Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, was introduced into the affected regions. However, the origin of this virulent pathogen is unknown. A survey was conducted of 697 archived specimens of 3 species of Xenopus collected from 1879 to 1999 in southern Africa in which the histologic features of the interdigital webbing were analyzed. The earliest case of chytridiomycosis found was in a Xenopus laevis frog in 1938, and overall prevalence was 2.7%. The prevalence showed no significant differences between species, regions, season, or time period. Chytridiomycosis was a stable endemic infection in southern Africa for 23 years before any positive specimen was found outside Africa. We propose that Africa is the origin of the amphibian chytrid and that the international trade in X. laevis that began in the mid-1930s was the means of dissemination.
One of the biggest threats facing amphibian species and population survival worldwide is the disease chytridiomycosis, caused by the chytrid fungus, Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (1,2). Chytridiomycosis was proposed as the cause of death in frog populations in the rain forests of Australia and Panama and was associated with the decline of frog populations in Ecuador, Venezuela, New Zealand, and Spain (3–6). Evidence for a countrywide decline in frog populations in South Africa is lacking (7), and local declines of several species have been ascribed to two main threats, habitat destruction and pollution (8). Chytridiomycosis is known in South Africa from infections in X. laevis, Afrana fuscigula, and Strongylopus grayii (9–11). Through surveys of extant and archived specimens, Batrachochytrium has been found in every continent that has amphibians, except Asia (6,9,12,13). Since B. dendrobatidis has been recognized as an emerging pathogen, whose spread is facilitated by the international and intranational movement of amphibians (1), identifying its origin will be useful.
Some emerging infectious diseases arise when pathogens localized that have been localized to a single host or small geographic region go beyond previous boundaries (14). If B. dendrobatidis emerged in this fashion, we hypothesize that the source would meet the following criteria: 1) the hosts would show minimal or no apparent clinical effects, 2) the site would be the place of the earliest known global occurrence, 3) the date of this occurrence would precede any amphibian declines in pristine areas (i.e., late 1970s), 4) the prevalence in the source host or hosts would be stable over time, 5) no geographic spreading pattern would be observed over time in the region, 6) a feasible means of global dissemination of Batrachochytrium from the region of origin would be identified, and 7) B. dendrobatidis would show a greater genetic variation in the host region than in more recently invaded regions.
B. dendrobatidis is common in African frogs from Ghana, Kenya, South Africa, and Western Africa (12,15) and declines in frog populations are poorly documented in Africa (7,16). These factors, combined with the global trade in X. laevis and X. tropicalis, prompted us to investigate the likelihood that Africa was the origin of Batrachochytrium and that the trade in Xenopus spp. played a key role in its global dissemination. Within the Xenopus genus, X. laevis is distributed over the greatest area in sub-Saharan Africa. X. laevis occupies most bodies of water in savannah habitats from the Cape of Good Hope to Nigeria and Sudan (17,18).
We report the earliest case of the amphibian chytrid found in any amphibian and present epidemiologic evidence to support the hypothesis that B. dendrobatidis originated in Africa. In this article, chytridiomycosis refers to infection of amphibians by B. dendrobatidis.
A retrospective survey was conducted on archived specimens of the genus Xenopus housed in five southern Africa institutions, Bayworld (Port Elizabeth), Natal Museum (Pietermaritzburg), National Museum (Bloemfontein), South African Museum (Cape Town), and Transvaal Museum (Pretoria). Specimens in these museums had been collected for archiving by a large number of persons for various purposes and had not been selected for a systematic survey of amphibian disease. Specimens were collected mainly from South Africa, Lesotho, and Swaziland. A piece (3 x 3 mm) of the interdigital webbing was removed from one hind foot of each specimen of X. gilli, X. muelleri, and X. laevis. Tissue was prepared for histologic examination with routine techniques (19). Sections were cut at 6 μm and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Chytridiomycosis was diagnosed by using described criteria (20). Sections from the two specimens diagnosed as having chytridiomycosis with hematoxylin and eosin before 1971 (one collected in 1938, the other in 1943) were confirmed with the more specific immunoperoxidase test (21) to increase the confidence of the diagnosis. Measurements of sporangia were performed with a calibrated eyepiece and expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Histologic slides were examined “blind,” without reference to dates that the frogs were collected, to decrease any opportunity for bias in diagnosis.
Exact versions of chi-square tests were used to analyze bivariate associations between chytridiomycosis prevalence and host species, region in South Africa (southwestern, eastern, and central), and season. Bivariate time trends of prevalences were analyzed by exact chi-square tests for trend. Multivariate logistic regression models were applied to assess potential confounding effect of species, region, and season on the time trend of chytridiomycosis prevalence. Confidence intervals (CI) were calculated by using exact binomial probabilities. Longitudinal and latitudinal historical patterns of spread were analyzed with linear regression models.
Zoosporangia with a diameter (mean ± SD) of 5.2 ± 0.72 μm (maximum 6 μm) were seen in the stratum corneum of the digital webbing of infected frogs (Figure 1). Most sporangia were empty spherical structures, but occasional sporangia were observed with developing stages, septa, or discharge papillae. The structures stained brown (indicating positivity) in the immunoperoxidase test with the specific anti-Batrachochytrium antibody (Figure 1). Lesions usually associated with chytridiomycosis, including hyperplasia of the epidermis and hyperkeratosis of the stratum corneum, were mild and localized to areas of infection.
Overall, chytridiomycosis prevalence from the survey was 2.7% (19 positives out of 697 specimens) and did not differ significantly across species (p = 0.7; Table 1). The earliest date for a chytridiomycosis-positive specimen was 1938 in an X. laevis collected from the Western Cape coastal lowland. This specimen is housed in the South African Museum, Cape Town (SAMZR 18927). The next earliest positive specimen detected was an X. gilli from 1943 (specimen number NMB 112, National Museum, Bloemfontein). The distribution of dates specimens were collected was greatly skewed to the latter half of the 20th century (Table 2). The breakdown for the time interval 1871–1940 is presented in order (decade, number of frogs infected/number of frogs examined) as follows: 1871–1880, 0/1; 1881–1890, 0/0; 1891–1900, 0/6; 1901–1910, 0/6; 1911–1920, 0/4; 1921–1930, 0/2; 1931–1940, 1/37. No statistically significant change of chytridiomycosis prevalence occurred over the decades since the 1940s (p = 0.36), or when the broader interval of pre-1971 is used as the baseline for the calculations (p = 0.22; Figure 2). No evidence for any trend in prevalence over time could be found using multivariate modeling where the odds ratios for the time intervals were adjusted for the potential confounders of species, season, and region. The multivariate odds ratios in these models were not significant and very similar to the bivariate findings, which indicate no confounding effects. The prevalence of chytridiomycosis in South Africa showed no significant change over time after 1940. No significant change of the geographic distribution of chytridiomycosis was detected after 1973. By 1973 the distribution of chytridiomycosis, as proved by positive specimens, covered already the area from 27° to 34° latitude and 18.25° to 32.5° longitude. This finding implies that positive specimens were detected from all regions of southern Africa by 1973. Infected frogs were found in 5 of the 9 provinces in South Africa, including the Western Cape (5 of 171), Northern Cape (2 of 22), Free State (6 of 141), Kwazulu-Natal (3 of 152), and Eastern Cape (1 of 137), as well as in Swaziland (2 of 42). Prevalence of B. dendrobatidis did not differ (p = 0.24) between the designated three broader regions with prevalences of 3.0% in the southwest, 3.8% in the central region, and 1.5% in the eastern region. Overall, the seasons (wet versus dry) when the specimens were collected were not significantly associated with prevalence (p = 0.22). Only in the eastern region, was a significantly higher prevalence found in the wet season than the dry season.
Our study has extended the date for the earliest case of chytridiomycosis in wild amphibians by 23 years. The next earliest case outside South Africa was found in Rana clamitans from Saint-Pierre-de-Wakefield, Québec, Canada, in 1961 (22). After the case in Canada, the earliest cases from other countries follow sequentially over a period of 38 years from 1961 to 1999 (Figure 3).
X. laevis in the wild does not show clinical signs, nor has it experienced any sudden die-offs. Moreover, only subclinical chytrid infections have been observed among captive colonies of X. laevis (26,27). A frog of a related species, X. tropicalis, died in captivity from chytridiomycosis, it was suspected of having contracted the fungus from X. laevis (27). An ideal host for transmission of chytridiomycosis through international translocation would be a species of amphibian that does not become diseased or die from the infection; hence, X. laevis could take on the role of a natural carrier.
The sudden appearance of chytridiomycosis can best be explained by the hypothesis that B. dendrobatidis was recently introduced into new regions and subsequently infected novel host species (1). Dispersal of B. dendrobatidis between countries is most likely by the global transportation of amphibians (1,2,23,28,29). The World Organization for Animal Health has recently placed amphibian chytridiomycosis on the Wildlife Diseases List in recognition of this risk. If Africa is the source of B. dendrobatidis, a feasible route of dissemination by infected amphibians needs to be identified. Some members of the family Pipidae have been exported, in particular Hymenochirus curtipes and X. laevis, to North America and Europe (30).
In terms of a most likely candidate for spread from Africa, the number of frogs and geographic dissemination favor X. laevis. Soon after discovery of the pregnancy assay for humans in 1934 (30), enormous quantities of the species were caught in the wild in southern Africa and exported around the world. The pregnancy assay is based on the principle that ovulation in X. laevis is induced by injection with urine from pregnant women because of high levels of gonadotropic hormones in the urine (31,32). X. laevis was selected as the most suitable amphibian for investigating the mechanism of the mating reflex because of the relative ease with which the animal can be maintained in captivity (33). For 34 years, the trade in X. laevis in South Africa was controlled by the then Cape of Good Hope Inland Fisheries Department (Western Cape Nature Conservation Board) at the Jonkershoek Fish Hatchery. As an indication of the numbers involved in this trade, 10,866 frogs were distributed in 1949, of which 3,803 (35%) were exported, and of the 20,942 frogs distributed in 1970, a total of 4,950 (24%) were shipped abroad (34,35). After the introduction of nonbiologic pregnancy tests, X. laevis became important as a model for the scientific study of immunity and later embryology and molecular biology. X. laevis could have carried the disease globally, particularly if the prevalence was similar to that seen in wild-caught X. laevis today. In the importing country, escaped frogs, the water they lived in (36), or both, could have come into contact with local amphibian species, and subsequent transmission of the disease could have followed. The establishment of feral populations of X. laevis in Ascension Island, the United Kingdom, the United States, and Chile in 1944, 1962, the 1960s, and 1985 (37), respectively, show that transmission could have become ongoing if these feral populations were infected.
Although we have demonstrated that B. dendrobatidis was in southern Africa since 1938, our studies provide no indication regarding whether this region was the original source within Africa. B. dendrobatidis has been found in wild frogs in Kenya and in frogs (X. tropicalis and X. laevis) wild-caught in Western Africa and detected after importation into the United States (12,26,27,38), which indicates that B. dendrobatidis is widely disseminated in Africa. Xenopus consists of 17 species that are found in sub-Saharan Africa, with a varying degree of sympatry between species (17). The overlap in the distribution and, in some cases, the sharing of habitats could facilitate transmission of B. dendrobatidis between these species. This finding would imply that chytridiomycosis could have originated elsewhere in Africa and spread within multiple host-region combinations. More detailed historical studies of archived African amphibians may indicate whether B. dendrobatidis was originally present in a small area of Africa from which it emerged to occupy large areas of the continent. Until the deficit in distribution data and comparative genetic studies is remedied, locating the source of the origin of B. dendrobatidis within Africa remains speculative. The relationship appears to have coevolved within an anuran host, and the opportunity to disseminate across the globe existed for B. dendrobatidis in southern Africa.
If X. laevis did carry B. dendrobatidis out of Africa as we propose, other amphibian species subsequently could have distributed it between and within countries. The American bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana, has been proposed as an important vector, mainly through international trade as a food item, but also within countries as populations established for the food trade escape and spread (29). The earliest current record for the occurrence of chytridiomycosis in R. catesbeiana is 1978 in South Carolina (38), 40 years after the first record in southern Africa, but details on the intensity of the search for chytridiomycosis in archived bullfrogs are not available. The transmission of chytridiomycosis globally may involve a series of key steps: 1) occurrence of B. dendrobatidis in an amphibian vector in southern Africa that is relatively resistant to disease (X. laevis), 2) sudden rise in 1935 of export trade in this vector because of technologic advances (Xenopus pregnancy test), 3) escape of the pathogen from the exported Xenopus to establish new foci in other countries (possibly expedited in some countries by establishment of feral populations of X. laevis), 4) transmission into other vector amphibians (food and pet trade), and 5) further transmission to other countries along different trade routes in key amphibian vectors that move in high numbers and become established in commercial populations and closely interact with wild frogs, which likely leads to feral populations (food frogs R. catesbeiana). Spread through native amphibian populations with epidemic disease in some species could have occurred at any point after B. dendrobatidis entered a naïve native species.
We have provided epidemiologic evidence that Africa is the origin of the amphibian chytrid fungus. Support for six of the seven criteria proposed for the source of B. dendrobatidis has been demonstrated: 1) the major host (X. laevis) shows minimal or no apparent clinical effects, 2) site of the earliest global occurrence (1938), 3) this date precedes any amphibian declines in pristine areas, 4) the prevalence in the source host or hosts (Xenopus spp.) has been stable over time, 5) no geographic spreading pattern could be observed over time, and 6) a feasible means of global dissemination exists via the international trade in wild-caught X. laevis, which commenced in 1935 and continues today. Criterion 7, greater genetic diversity of B. dendrobatidis at the source, has not been investigated. A low level of genetic variation was shown for 35 strains of B. dendrobatidis and suggested that B. dendrobatidis was a recently emerged clone (39). The strains had been collected in North America, Australia, Panama, and Africa from wild and captive amphibians. Three strains isolated from captive X. tropicalis in United States had been imported from Ghana. Although these showed no significant differences from the U.S. strains (39), their assignment to Africa assumes no cross-infection had occurred within the importing facility. Future work on the genetic diversity of B. dendrobatidis in Africa compared with strains from regions outside Africa will add weight to the hypothesis if greater genetic diversity is found in African strains.
Mr. Weldon is a Ph.D. candidate and research assistant at the School of Environmental Sciences and Development, North-West University, South Africa. His research interests include the role of disease in amphibian declines, the effect of pesticides on amphibian biology, and the captive husbandry of Xenopus.
We thank Bayworld (Port Elizabeth), Natal Museum (Pietermaritzburg), National Museum (Bloemfontein), South African Museum (Cape Town), and Transvaal Museum (Pretoria) for making the material available.
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation (South Africa) and the Declining Amphibian Populations Task Force.
- Daszak P, Berger L, Cunningham AA, Hyatt AD, Green DE, Speare R. Emerging infectious diseases and amphibian population declines. Emerg Infect Dis. 1999;5:735–48.
- Speare R; Core Working Group of Getting the Jump on Amphibian Disease. Nomination for listing of amphibian chytridiomycosis as a key threatening process under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. In: Speare R, Steering Committee of Getting the Jump on Amphibian Disease, editors. Developing management strategies to control amphibian diseases: decreasing the risks due to communicable diseases. Townsville, Australia: School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, James Cook University; 2001. p. 163–84. Available from http://www.jcu.edu.au/school/phtm/PHTM/frogs/adms/attach7.pdf.
- Berger L, Speare R, Daszak P, Green DE, Cunningham AA, Gonnin CL, Chytridiomycosis causes amphibian mortality associated with population declines in the rain forests of Australia and Central America. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:9031–6.
- Lips KR. Mass mortality of the anuran fauna at an upland site in Panama. Conserv Biol. 1999;13:11725.
- Bonaccorso E, Guayasamin JM, Méndez D, Speare R. Chytridiomycosis in a Venezuelan amphibian (Bufonidae: Atelopus cruciger). Herpetol Rev. 2003;34:331–4.
- Bosh J, Martínez-Solano I, García-Prís M. Evidence of a chytrid fungus infection involved in the decline of the common midwife toad (Alytes obstetricans) in protected areas of central Spain. Biol Conserv. 2000;97:331–7.
- Channing A, Van Dijk DE. Amphibia. In: Cowan GI, editor. Wetlands of South Africa. Pretoria, South Africa.: Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism; 1995. p. 193–206.
- Harrison JA, Burger M, Minter LR, De Villiers AL, Baard EHW, Scott E, , eds. Conservation assessment and management plan for southern African frogs. Apple Valley (MN): World Conservation Union/Species Survival Commission Conservation Breeding Specialist Group; 2001.
- Weldon C. Chytridiomycosis survey in South Africa. Froglog. 2002;51:1–2.
- Hopkins S, Channing A. Chytrid fungus in Northern and Western cape frog populations, South Africa. Herp Rev. 2003;34:334–6.
- Lane EP, Weldon C, Bingham J. Histological evidence of chytridiomycosis in a free-ranging amphibian (Afrana fuscigula [Anura: Ranidae]) in South Africa. J S A Vet Assoc. 2003;74:20–1.
- Speare R, Berger L. Global distribution of chytridiomycosis in amphibians. 2002 Oct [cited 2003 Feb 11]. Available from http://www.jcu.edu.au/school/phtm/PHTM/frogs/chyglob.htm
- Carey C, Cohen N, Rollins-Smith L. Amphibian declines: an immunological perspective. Dev Comp Immunol. 1999;23:459–72.
- Morse SS. Factors in the emergence of infections diseases. Emerg Infect Dis. 1995;1:7–15.
- Carey C, Bradford DF, Brunner JL, Collins JP, Davidson EW, Longcore JE, In: Linder G, Krest SK, Sparling DW, editors. Amphibian decline: an integrated analysis of multiple stressor effects. Pensacola (FL): Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry; 2003. p. 153–208.
- Sparling DW, Kerst SK, Linder G. In: Linder G, Krest SK, Sparling DW, editors. Amphibian decline: an integrated analysis of multiple stressor effects. Pensacola (FL): Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry; 2003. p. 1–7.
- Tinsley RC, Loumont C, Kobel HR. In: Tinsley RC, Kobel HR, editors. The biology of Xenopus. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press; 1996. p. 35–59.
- Channing A. Amphibians of central and southern Africa. Menlo Park, Pretoria, South Africa: Protea Book House; 2001.
- Culling CFA. Handbook of histopathological techniques. London: Butterworths; 1963.
- Berger L, Speare R, Kent A. Diagnosis of chytridiomycosis in amphibians by histologic examination. In: Speare R, Steering Committee of Getting the Jump on Amphibian Disease, editors. Developing management strategies to control amphibian diseases: Decreasing the risks due to communicable diseases. Townsville, Australia: School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, James Cook University; 2001. p. 83–93. Available from http://www.jcu.edu.au/school/phtm/PHTM/frogs/histo/chhisto.htm
- Berger L, Hyatt AD, Olsen V, Hengstberger S, Boyle D, Marantelli G, Production of polyclonal antibodies to Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis and their use in an immunoperoxidase test for chytridiomycosis in amphibians. Dis Aquat Organ. 2002;48:213–20.
- Quellet M, Mikaelian I, Pauli BD, Rodrique J, Green DM. Historical evidence of widespread chytrid infection in North American amphibian populations. 2003 Joint Meeting of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists, 26 June–1 July 2003, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil [cited 2004 April 10]. Available from http://lists.allenpress.com/asih/meetings/2003/abstracts_IV_2003.pdf
- Berger L, Speare R, Hyatt A. Chytrid fungi and amphibian declines: Overview, implications and future directions. In: Campbell A, editor. Declines and disappearances of Australian frogs. Canberra, Australia: Biodiversity Group Environment Australia; 1999. p. 23–33.
- Rollins-Smith LA, Reinert LK, Miera V, Conlon JM. Antimicrobial peptide defenses of the Tarahumara frog, Rana tarahumarae. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002;297:361–7.
- Waldman B, van de Wolfshaar KE, Klena JD, Andjic V, Bishop PJ. Norman RJdeB. Chytridiomycosis in New Zealand frogs. Surveillance. 2001;28:9–11.
- Reed KR, Ruth GR, Meyer JA, Shukla SK. Chlamydia pneumoniae infection in a breeding colony of African clawed frogs (Xenopus tropicalis). Emerg Infect Dis. 2000;6:196–9.
- Parker JM, Mikaelian I, Hahn N, Diggs HE. Clinical diagnosis and treatment of epidermal chytridiomycosis in African clawed frogs (Xenopus tropicalis). Comp Med. 2002;52:265–8.
- Mutschmann F, Berger L, Zwart P, Gaedicke C. [Chytridiomycosis in amphibians - first report in Europe.]. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 2000;113:380–3.
- Mazzoni R, Cunningham AC, Daszak P, Apolo A, Perdomo E, Speranza G. Emerging pathogen of wild amphibians in frogs (Rana catesbiana) farmed for international trade. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:995–8.
- Hey D. Water and Wildlife. Cape Town, South Africa: Timmins Publishers; 1986.
- Hogben LT, Charles E, Slome D. Studies of the pituitary. J Exp Biol. 1931;8:345.
- Shapiro HA, Zwarenstein H. A rapid test for pregnancy on Xenopus laevis. Nature. 1934;133:762.
- Shapiro HA. The influence of the pituitary-like substance in human pregnancy urine on the motor components of sexual behavior in the South African clawed toad (Xenopus laevis). J Exp Biol. 1936;13:48–56.
- Provincial Administration of the Cape of Good Hope, Union of South Africa. Inland Fisheries Department Report No. 6. Cape Town, South Africa: The Institute; 1949.
- Provincial Administration of the Cape of Good Hope, Union of South Africa. Department of Nature Conservation Report No. 27. Cape Town, South Africa: The Institute; 1970.
- Johnson ML, Speare R. Survival of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis in water: quarantine and disease control implications. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:922–5.
- Tinsley RC, McCoid MJ. In: The biology of Xenopus. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press; 1996. p. 81–94.
- Daszak P. in Speare R, Berger L. Global distribution of chytridiomycosis in amphibians. 2004. [cited 2004 April 10] Available from http://www.jcu.edu.au/school/phtm/PHTM/frogs/chyglob.htm
- Moorehouse EA, James TY, Ganley ARD, Vilgalys R, Berger L, Murphy PJ, Multilocus sequence typing suggests the chytrid pathogen of amphibians is a recently emerged clone. Mol Ecol. 2003;12:395–403.
- Figure 1. Micrographs of immunoperoxidase stained sections through the interdigital webbing of Xenopus gilli, showing the morphologic features and size of zoosporangia consistent with Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis. A) Arrow a indicates localized...
- Figure 2. Historical time-trend of chytridiomycosis prevalence in southern Africa. No significant change was shown in the prevalence over time (p = 0.22, 95% confidence interval).
- Figure 3. Time bar indicating when chytridiomycosis first appeared in the major centers of occurrence in relation to each other. Following a 23-year interruption in occurrences after the Xenopus laevis infection...
- Table 1. Prevalence of chytridiomycosis in archived Xenopus spp. from southern Africaa
- Table 2. Prevalence of chytridiomycosis in archived Xenopus, by time intervalsa
Suggested citation for this article: Weldon C, du Preez LH, Hyatt AD, Muller R, Speare R. Origin of the amphibian chytrid fungus. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet]. 2004 Dec [date cited]. Available from http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/10/12/03-0804
Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:
Ché Weldon, School of Environmental Sciences and Development, North-West University, Private Bag X6001, Potchefstroom 2520, South Africa; fax: 27-18-299 2503
Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
- Page created: April 14, 2011
- Page last updated: April 14, 2011
- Page last reviewed: April 14, 2011
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID)
Office of the Director (OD)