Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

Volume 11, Number 11—November 2005

Dispatch

Vibrio cholerae Pathogenic Clones

Anna Salim*, Ruiting Lan†, and Peter R. Reeves*Comments to Author 
Author affiliations: *University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; †University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Main Article

Figure 1

Distribution of base differences in strains of Vibrio cholerae. The base positions relative to the start of the ATG codon are shown. Isolates 395 and E9120 were compared for the fruK, lytB, metE, pepN, pyrG, fumC, malP, metG, pyrC, and sdaA genes, and isolates 395 and E506 were compared for the gyrB gene.

Figure 1. Distribution of base differences in strains of Vibrio cholerae. The base positions relative to the start of the ATG codon are shown. Isolates 395 and E9120 were compared for the fruK, lytB, metE, pepN, pyrG, fumC, malP, metG, pyrC, and sdaA genes, and isolates 395 and E506 were compared for the gyrB gene.

Main Article

TOP