Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 13, Number 12—December 2007
Research

Phenotypic Similarity of Transmissible Mink Encephalopathy in Cattle and L-type Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy in a Mouse Model

On This Page
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Cite This Article
Figures
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Tables
Table
Downloads
Article
RIS [TXT - 2 KB]
Article Metrics
Metric Details
60
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Author affiliations: *Agence Française de Sécurité Sanitaire des Aliments–Lyon, Lyon, France; †Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana, USA;

Cite This Article

Abstract

Transmissible mink encepholapathy (TME) is a foodborne transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) of ranch-raised mink; infection with a ruminant TSE has been proposed as the cause, but the precise origin of TME is unknown. To compare the phenotypes of each TSE, bovine-passaged TME isolate and 3 distinct natural bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) agents (typical BSE, H-type BSE, and L-type BSE) were inoculated into an ovine transgenic mouse line (TgOvPrP4). Transgenic mice were susceptible to infection with bovine-passaged TME, typical BSE, and L-type BSE but not to H-type BSE. Based on survival periods, brain lesions profiles, disease-associated prion protein brain distribution, and biochemical properties of protease-resistant prion protein, typical BSE had a distint phenotype in ovine transgenic mice compared to L-type BSE and bovine TME. The similar phenotypic properties of L-type BSE and bovine TME in TgOvPrP4 mice suggest that L-type BSE is a much more likely candidate for the origin of TME than is typical BSE.

Transmissible mink encephalopathy (TME) is a rare prion disease in ranch-raised mink (Mustela vison) in North America and Europe (1–4). Six outbreaks have been reported from 1947 through 1985 in North America, and several have been linked to contaminated commercial feed (1). Although contamination of feed with scrapie-infected sheep parts has been proposed as the cause of TME, the origin of the disease remains elusive. The idea that scrapie in sheep may be a source of TME infection is supported by findings that scrapie-infected mink have a similar distribution of vacuolar pathologic features in the brain and the same clinical signs as mink with natural and experimental TME (5). However, mink are not susceptible to scrapie infection following oral exposure for up to 4 years postinoculation, which suggests that either the scrapie agent may not be the source of natural TME infection or that only specific strains of the scrapie agent are able to induce TME (6,7).

Epidemiologic investigations in the Stetsonville, Wisconsin, outbreak of TME in 1985 suggested a possible cattle origin, since mink were primarily fed downer or dead dairy cattle but not sheep products (8). Experimental transmission of Stetsonville TME into cattle resulted in transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) disease with an incubation period of 18.5 months. Back passage of bovine TME into mink resulted in incubation periods of 4 and 7 months after oral or intracerebral inoculation, respectively, which was similar to that found following inoculation of Stetsonville TME into mink by these same routes (8). These findings indicated that cattle are susceptible to TME, and that bovine-passaged TME did not result in a reduced pathogenicity for mink. These studies raised the question as to whether an unknown TSE in cattle was the source of TME infection in the Stetsonville outbreak. Several additional TME outbreaks in the United States have been associated with mink diet that contained downer or dead cattle (9). These TME outbreaks happened before bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) was identified in Europe or before 3 cases of BSE had occurred in the United States after 2003. Despite a potential link of TME with a cattle TSE, clinical and histologic studies indicate that mink inoculated with BSE have features that distinguish this disease from natural and experimental TME (7,8,10).

Recent studies demonstrate, on the basis of the molecular features of the protease-resistant prion protein (PrPres), that BSE has at least 3 different phenotypes in cattle (11). The cattle TSEs include: a) typical BSE, which is the prion strain identified during the BSE epidemic in Europe during the 1980s; b) H-type BSE, which is an uncommon type that was originally found in France (12); and c) L-type BSE, also called bovine amyloidotic spongiform encephalopathy (BASE), which is a rare form of BSE first identified in Italy (13). More recently, the H-type and L-type BSEs have been shown to differ from typical BSE with respect to incubation periods, vacuolar pathologic changes in the brain, and biochemical properties of PrPres in mice on transmission into wild-type or transgenic mice that express the bovine prion protein gene (14–18). The origin of these BSE cases is unknown, but researchers have proposed that they represent a spontaneous form of TSE in cattle that is distinct from typical BSE; alternative hypotheses have also been considered, for example, cross-species contamination by another TSE source such as scrapie (15). If TME were to be due to infection with a cattle TSE, then these unusual forms of BSE are potential candidate agents since they may have a more widespread geographic distribution and were likely to precede the appearance of BSE in the USA.

In previous reports (19–22), to compare typical BSE and scrapie strains ruminants TSEs were transmitted into transgenic mice (TgOvPrP4) that overexpress the ovine prion gene (19–22). In the current study, we investigated the possible origins of TME by transmission of the bovine-passaged Stetsonville TME agent into TgOvPrP4 mice, to compare the molecular and histopathologic features to those of typical and atypical BSE types. Our findings indicate that bovine TME is distinct from typical BSE and H-type BSE but shares many features with L-type BSE. The implications of these findings with respect to the origin of TME are discussed.

Materials and Methods

Cattle TSE Isolates

Cattle TSE isolates used in these studies included: a) the Stetsonville TME isolate experimentally-passaged into cattle as previously described (8); b) an L-type BSE isolate (02-2528) (11,13,23,24); c) a H-type BSE isolate (03-2095) (12,14,17); and d) a typical BSE isolate (01-2281), for which transmission in TgOvPrP4 ovine transgenic mice was previously described (20). The typical, L-type, and H-type BSE cases were diagnosed after active surveillance by rapid tests at rendering plants; the animals were 4, 8, and 12 years of age at death, respectively. For a comparison of BSE transmission without a species barrier in ovine transgenic mice, a BSE isolate passaged in sheep (SB1) was also included in mouse transmissions studies (20,21).

Mouse Lines and Experimental Infections

The TgOvPrP4 mouse line expresses the ovine prion protein gene (A136R154Q171 genotype) in a PrP null mouse background as previously described (25). The ovine prion protein gene is 2–4× more important in a sheep brain of the same PrP genotype. Mice were cared for and housed according to the guidelines of the French Ethical Committee (decree 87-848) and European Community Directive 86/609/EEC. Experiments were performed in the biohazard prevention area (A3) of the author’s institution with the approval of the Rhône-Alpes Ethical Committee for Animal Experiments.

Female mice, 4 to 6 weeks of age (6–12 animals per experimental group), were inoculated intracerebrally with 10% (wt/vol) cattle brain homogenates in 5% glucose (20 μL per animal). Brain specimens from TgOvPrP4 mice in which a TSE developed were subsequently passaged by intracerebral inoculation of a 1% (wt/vol) homogenate into a second group of transgenic mice. Mice were sacrificed at the terminal stage of disease, and the brains were collected and either analyzed for PrPres by Western blot or fixed in buffered 4% paraformaldehyde for histopathologic studies. Statistical analyses of survival periods were performed by using the log-rank test and the R software package (version 2.4.1); p values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Western Blot Analyses of PrPres

PrPres was extracted from bovine brain stem samples by using the TeSeE Western blot Bio-Rad kit (Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France; Ref 355 1169) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, 250 μL of 20% brain homogenates were incubated with an equal volume of reconstituted proteinase K solution (reagent A + PK) at 37°C for 10 min. After addition of 250 μL of reagent B, samples were centrifuged at 15,000× g for 7 min. The pellets were resuspended in 50 μL of denaturing buffer (TD4215) (4% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS], 2% β-mercaptoethanol, 192 mmol/L glycine, 25 mmol/L Tris, and 5% sucrose), heated for 5 min at 100°C, then centrifuged at 12,000× g for 15 min. The pellets were discarded, and the supernatants were run on a 15% SDS–polyacrylamide gel (SDS-PAGE) before transfer to nitrocellulose membrane and immunoblotting with anti-PrP antibodies. Western blot methods used to identify and characterize PrPres in TgOvPrP4 mice have been previously described (19,20). Briefly, PrPres was obtained after mouse brain homogenates were treated with proteinase K (Roche, Meylan, France) (10 µg/100 mg brain tissue for 1 h at 37°C) and concentration by ultra-centrifugation (100,000 g for 2 h on a 10% sucrose cushion). After denaturation in TD4215 buffer, PrPres was separated in 15% SDS-PAGE, electroblotted to nitrocellulose membranes, then detected on the membrane by using anti-PrP monoclonal antibodies.

PrPres was detected by using anti-PrP Bar233 monoclonal antibody (ascitic fluid 1/10,000, provided by J. Grassi) or Sha31 (1/10 from kit TeSeE sheep/goat Bio-Rad) against the ovine 152-FGSDYEDRYYRE-163 and 156-YEDRYYRE-163 PrP sequences, respectively. Quantitative studies of PrPres polypeptide molecular mass and glycoforms proportions were performed by using Quantity One (Bio-Rad) software analysis of chemiluminescent signals following >3 independent runs of the samples from >3 different mice per experimental group. Glycoforms ratios were expressed as mean percentages (± standard deviations) of the total signal for the 3 PrPres glycoforms and the apparent molecular masses were evaluated by comparison of the positions of the PrPres bands with a biotinylated marker (B2787; Sigma, St. Quentin Fallavier, France).

Histopathologic Analyses

Mouse brain fixed in buffered 4% paraformaldehyde was treated for 1 h at room temperature with formic acid (98%–100%) before being embedded in paraffin blocks (Thermo Electron, Cergy-Pontoise, France). Tissue sections, 5 μm thick, were cut from paraffin blocks, placed on treated glass slides (Starfrost, Medite Histotechnic, Burgdorf, Germany), and dried overnight at 55°C. Once dewaxed, slides were stained for either histopathologic or immunohistochemical examination. Amyloid deposits were identified with a Congo red stain, and vacuolar lesions were observed on slides stained with hematoxylin-eosin (HE), according to Fraser’s lesion profile analyses (26). Lesion profiles were measured by using a computer-assisted method (27). Brain slices were immunostained for the presence of disease-associated prion protein (PrPd) by using 2 μg/mL of anti-PrP SAF84 monoclonal antibody (SPI Bio, Massy, France). Recently described pre-treatments designed to enhance PrPd detection were also applied (28). These consisted of a 10-min formic acid (98%) bath at room temperature, 20 min of hydrated autoclaving at 121°C (Prestige Medical, AES Laboratories, Blackburn Lane, UK), and digestion at 37°C with proteinase K (Roche Diagnostics, Meylan, France) at a concentration of 20 μg/mL for 15 min, with an additional incubation with streptomycin sulfate at 8.75 mmol/L for 1 h. Endogenous peroxidase activity was also blocked. A peroxidase-labeled avidin-biotin complex (Vectastain Elite ABC, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) and a solution of diaminobenzidine intensified with nickel chloride (DAB-Ni, Zymed, Montrouge, France) to give black deposits were used to amplify and visualize binding of the disease-associated form of PrP (PrPd). Final detection was achieved with a solution of diaminobenzidine intensified with nickel chloride (DAB-Ni, Zymed) to give black deposits. The specificity of PrPd immunolabeling was also assessed by using uninfected brain samples. Finally, the slides were counterstained with aqueous hematoxylin, dehydrated, mounted by using Eukitt mounting medium (VWR International, Limonest, France) and observed under a light microscope BX51 (Olympus, Rungis, France) coupled to an image analysis workstation (MorphoExpert Software, Explora Nova, La Rochelle, France).

Results

Transmission of TSE Isolates in TgOvPrP4 Mice

To determine the ability of the 4 bovine TSE isolates (experimental bovine TME, L-type BSE, H-type BSE, and a typical BSE natural isolate) to cause a TSE in a common host species, they were inoculated into TgOvPrP4 mice (Table). The shortest survival period was observed in mice infected with the typical BSE isolate (421 ± 48 days), compared with 436 ± 77 days or 627 ± 74 days in TgOvPrP4 mice inoculated with bovine TME or L-type BSE, respectively. At second serial passage of bovine TME, L-type BSE, and typical BSE into TgOvPrP4 mice, the survival periods were shortened for all 3 sources, but especially for L-type BSE (202 ± 26 days) and bovine TME (234 ± 27 days), although survival periods were statistically different for these 2 groups of mice (p = 0.0095). The survival period for typical BSE (354 ± 48 days) was significantly longer than that found for L-type BSE and bovine TME (p<0.0001). For the ovine BSE isolate, the incubation period was 296 ± 46 days at first passage, but the period increased to 365 ± 36 days at second passage. The survival period at second passage of ovine BSE was not significantly different from that of typical BSE (p = 0.814). Most of the mice inoculated with the 3 bovine TSE isolates were positive (28/31 at first passage) for PrPres by Western blot or PrPd by immunohistochemical testing. In contrast, all (8/8) the transgenic mice inoculated with the H-type BSE isolate, which had a survival period of 692 ± 129 days, were negative for PrPres by either Western blot or PrPd by immunohistochemical analyses.

PrPres Molecular Features in Cattle and in TgOvPrP4 Mice

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Western blot analyses of protease-resistant prion protein from proteinase K–treated brain homogenates from cattle transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs). Typical bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) (lanes 1, 5), L-type BSE (lane 2), transmissible mink encephalopathy (TME) in cattle (lane 3), H-type BSE (lane 4). Bars to the left of the panel indicate the 29.0- and 20.1-kDa marker positions.

Figure 1. Western blot analyses of protease-resistant prion protein from proteinase K–treated brain homogenates from cattle transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs). Typical bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) (lanes 1, 5), L-type BSE (lane 2), transmissible...

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Glycoforms proportions (means ± standard deviations) of protease-resistant prion protein detected by using Sha31 antibody. A) Cattle transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs). B) First passage of L-type and typical bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) into TgOvPrP4 mice. C) First passage of transmissible mink encephalopathy (TME) in cattle and L-type BSE into TgOvPrP4 mice. D) Second passage of TME in cattle and L-type BSE into TgOvPrP4 mice. Results from 3 individual mice from each experimental group are shown. Typical BSE in red, H-type BSE in yellow, L-type BSE in green, and TME-in-cattle in blue.

Figure 2. Glycoforms proportions (means ± standard deviations) of protease-resistant prion protein detected by using Sha31 antibody. A) Cattle transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs). B) First passage of L-type and typical bovine spongiform encephalopathy...

Western blot analysis of PrPres from bovine TME, L-type BSE, H-type BSE, and typical BSE used for inoculation into TgOvPrP4 mice was performed to compare the molecular features of PrPres. The bovine TME and L-type BSE isolates had similar molecular masses for the 3 PrPres polypeptides (Figure 1). The unglycosylated PrPres polypeptide has a similar molecular mass (≈18.5 kDa) in L-type BSE, bovine TME, and in typical BSE, whereas a difference in molecular mass (≈0.5–0.8 kDa lower) was found for the diglycosylated band in both L-type BSE and bovine TME compared to typical BSE. A comparison of PrPres glycoform ratios also showed similar proportions of the diglycosylated and monoglycosylated isoforms of PrPres in bovine TME and L-type BSE, both of which had lower levels of diglycosylated PrPres than in typical BSE (Figure 2, panel A).

Figure 3

Thumbnail of Western blot of protease-resistant prion protein from TgOvPrP4 mice after proteinase K digestion and immunodetection with anti-PrP Sha31 antibody. A) First passage of typical bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) (lanes 2, 4, and 6) and L-type BSE (lanes 3, 5, and 7). B) First passage of TME in cattle (lanes 2, 4, and 6) and L-type (lanes 3, 5, and 7). C) Second passage of TME in cattle (lanes 2, 4, and 6) and L-type BSE (lanes 3, 5, and 7). Each lane shows PrPres from a distinct individual mouse from each experimental group. Bars to the left of the panel indicate the 29.0- and 20.1-kDa marker positions. Lane 1, PrPres control from a scrapie-infected TgOvPrP4 mouse (C506M3 strain).

Figure 3. Western blot of protease-resistant prion protein from TgOvPrP4 mice after proteinase K digestion and immunodetection with anti-PrP Sha31 antibody. A) First passage of typical bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) (lanes 2, 4,...

On transmission of the bovine TSE isolates to TgOvPrP4 mice, the L-type BSE differed from typical BSE in its lower proportion of diglycosylated PrPres, but the molecular masses of the unglycosylated PrPres polypeptides were similar between these isolates (Figure 2, panel B, and Figure 3, panel A). In contrast, Western blot analysis of PrPres showed indistinguishable patterns in transgenic mice infected with the L-type BSE or bovine TME, with respect to the molecular mass of the 3 PrPres polypeptides (Figure 3, panel B) and the ratio of these PrPres glycoforms (Figure 2, panel C). These comparable features were maintained in both L-type BSE and bovine TME at second passage in TgOvPrP4 mice (Figure 2, panel D, and Figure 3, panel C), and these were distinct from typical BSE, on the basis of the ratio of the 3 PrPres glycoforms.

Histopathologic Features of TME in Cattle and L-type BSE in TgOvPrP4 Mice

Figure 4

Thumbnail of Brain lesion profiles (left panels) and disease-associated prion protein brain distribution (right panels) observed in the brain of TgOvPrP4 mice infected with L-type bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), at first (A, n = 5) and second (B, n = 4) passages; TME in cattle (C, n = 5); or typical BSE (D, n = 4) at second passage. Brain vacuolation was scored (means ± standard deviations) on a scale of 0–5 in the following brain areas: 1) dorsal medulla nuclei, 2) cerebellar cortex, 3) superior colliculus, 4) hypothalamus, 5) central thalamus, 6) hippocampus, 7) lateral septal nuclei, 8) cerebral cortex at the level of thalamus, and 9) cerebral cortex at the level of septal nuclei. In right panels, showing the PrPd distribution, stars indicate the presence of florid plaques.

Figure 4. Brain lesion profiles (left panels) and disease-associated prion protein brain distribution (right panels) observed in the brain of TgOvPrP4 mice infected with L-type bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE), at first (A, n...

To further examine the phenotypes of the bovine TSE agents, the distribution of vacuolar lesions and the distribution and features of PrPd were investigated at standardized brain levels of TgOvPrP4 mice (Figure 4). TgOvPrP4 mice infected with L-type BSE at first passage showed low vacuolar lesion intensity but PrPd accumulation was strongly detected, which was characterized by PrPd aggregation into plaques. These plaques were not amyloid based on an absence of Congo red birefringence (data not shown). At the second passage, L-type BSE agent induced a lower degree of PrPd accumulation than in the first passage; the type of deposition was fine powdery to granular, and no plaques were observed. Although the brain lesion profile showed a higher degree of vacuolation than in the first passage, the PrPd mapping was similar at first and second passage in transgenic mice. At second passage, some additional sites had PrPd accumulation, including the septal areas and the midbrain. The L-type BSE remained distinct from typical BSE, in terms of lesion profiles and types of PrPd deposition. In the brain of TgOvPrP4 mice infected with typical BSE and ovine BSE, numerous florid plaques containing PrPd were seen, and these were amyloid, based on Congo red staining. The florid plaques were prominent in the cortical regions of the brain in transgenic mice infected with typical BSE but were not found in any of the mice infected with L-type BSE at either first or second passage. At second passage, vacuolar changes were more intense in the dorsal medulla nuclei, hypothalamus, and hippocampus in mice infected with typical BSE; in L-type BSE-infected mice, lesions were more pronounced in the colliculus, thalamus, and cerebral cortex.

The distribution of vacuolar changes and PrPd in the brain of TME-infected mice was similar to that observed in mice infected with L-type BSE, although minor differences in the PrPd immunolabeling intensities were found in some brain regions, including the absence of the fine, powdery PrPd in the caudate putamen of bovine TME-infected mice. It is noteworthy that the PrPd distribution was also comparable in transgenic mice infected with bovine TME and typical BSE; however, no florid plaques were detected in any of the mice infected with bovine TME.

Discussion

Comparison of TME and 3 distinct types of BSE in a common host species was prompted by previous observations that TME, whose origin is unknown, did not reduce its pathogenicity for mink after passage into cattle (8), and transmission of TME into cattle resulted in a low-molecular-mass PrPres profile (29). A similar low-molecular-mass PrPres profile has been observed in L-type BSE or BASE (11,13,16), and in the current study, these similar PrPres molecular properties between bovine TME and L-type BSE were demonstrated in TgOvPrP4 mice. These 2 distinct bovine TSE sources were both readily transmitted into TgOvPrP4 mice (illustrating the usefulness of transgenic mouse models for prion agent strain typing when transmission to a common wild-type rodent is not possible) and had several common features including survival periods, PrPres molecular features, and the distribution of vacuolar pathologic changes. This combination of biochemical and phenotypic properties indicates that they have similar biologic properties in TgOvPrP4 mice and could represent independent isolation of the same TSE strain, although some subtle histologic differences between L-type BSE and bovine TME were observed on second passage in TgOvPrP4 mice. Additional serial passages from these cattle TSE sources are required for further characterization, especially since the possibility cannot be excluded that transmission of a cattle TSE into mink can modify its biologic properties.

In contrast, transmission of L-type BSE and typical BSE into TgOvPrP4 mice resulted in different incubation periods, PrPres molecular properties, and histopathologic features during 2 serial passages. The survival period at second passage for L-type BSE was considerably reduced and significantly shorter (>120 days) than typical BSE after 2 passages into TgOvPrP4 mice. Although florid plaques were found in transgenic mice infected with typical BSE, they were not observed in mice following first or second passage of L-type BSE in TgOvPrP4 mice. Analysis of PrPres properties also found differences between L-type and typical BSE with respect to the relative proportion of diglycosylated PrPres polypeptides. The lower molecular mass of the unglycosylated PrPres polypeptide in L-type BSE was maintained in TgOvPrP4 mice as well as in typical BSE. In cattle, the size of the unglycosylated PrPres polypeptide in L-type BSE is within the range of that found in typical BSE (16). Notably, our findings did not produce evidence for modification of the phenotypic features of these cattle TSEs on passage into TgOvPrP4 mice, which was recently described after transmission of L-type BSE into wild-type (18) or tg338 ovine transgenic (24) mice.

The current and previous studies demonstrate that when typical BSE and L-type BSE are transmitted into TgOvPrP4 mice, key features of these cattle TSEs were maintained (19–21). However, these transgenic mice were not susceptible to the H-type BSE, as confirmed with 4 other isolates (data not shown). This finding is in contrast to a previous study that demonstrated transmission of H-type BSE into a different transgenic mouse line expressing the ovine prion protein gene (15). Possible explanations for this discrepancy are the lower level of the cellular prion protein in TgOvPrP4 mice compared with tg338 mice (2- to 4-fold vs. 8- to 10-fold greater than ovine brain), different cellular patterns of expression due to the use of different promoters, or the different sequence of the prion gene (V136R154Q171 in tg338 mice) (20,30). These findings on the transmission of H-type into transgenic mice provide further evidence for the distinct biologic properties of this cattle TSE compared to L-type BSE and typical BSE.

The Stetsonville isolate of TME that was experimentally passaged into cattle was also readily transmitted into TgOvPrP4 mice and resulted in a TSE phenotype that shared common biologic features with L-type BSE, but not typical BSE, in these transgenic mice. Transmission of TME from temporally and geographically different outbreaks into cattle showed that bovine TME is similar among the different isolates but all of them are phenotypically distinct from typical BSE (7). Histopathologic studies showed more severe spongiform changes, especially at rostral levels, in cattle infected with TME (7) than infected with typical BSE, and these changes were also observed in TgOvPrP4 mice infected with L-type BSE at second passage. Conversely, mink infected with typical BSE had a greater degree of spongiform change in the brainstem than mink infected with TME (10). Similar changes were also observed in TgOvPrP4 mice infected with typical BSE. This preferential involvement of rostral brain regions in L-type BSE has also been described in cattle (13) and on transmission into bovine transgenic mice (18,24). Transmission of TME or typical BSE into wild-type mice (31,32) or hamsters (33,34) also resulted in distinct transmissibility between these TSEs in these host species. Based on these findings, we conclude that typical BSE is not a likely source for TME in mink; however, if TME were to be due to infection with a cattle TSE, the most likely candidate is L-type BSE.

L-type BSE has not been reported in the United States, although importation of cattle or cattle products with a TSE infection cannot be excluded as a potential source. Recently, 2 BSE cases identified in cattle born in the United States had unusual PrPres properties similar to those described for H-type BSE (11,12,35,36), which raised the possibility that atypical TSEs in cattle may be a source for TME infection. In Europe, the prevalence of the H-type or L-type BSE is estimated to be very low (in France the L-type BSE occurs at a prevalence of 1 case found PrPres positive in the brain stem per 3 million cattle tested per year) (23). The very rare prevalence of TME may be partially due to the rare occurrence of cattle TSEs that enter the mink diet (8,29).

Conclusion

These studies provide experimental evidence that the Stetsonville TME agent is distinct from typical BSE but has phenotypic similarities to L-type BSE in TgOvPrP4 mice. Our conclusion is that L-type BSE is a more likely candidate for a bovine source of TME infection than typical BSE. In the scenario that a ruminant TSE is the source for TME infection in mink, this would be a second example of transmission of a TSE from ruminants to non-ruminants under natural conditions or farming practices in addition to transmission of typical BSE to humans, domestic cats, and exotic zoo animals (37). The potential importance of this finding is relevant to L-type BSE, which based on experimental transmission into humanized PrP transgenic mice and macaques, suggests that L-type BSE is more pathogenic for humans than typical BSE (24,38).

Dr Baron is head of the Unit ATNC from Agence Française de Sécurité Sanitaire (AFSSA)–Lyon. His research focuses on prion diseases of ruminants, including diagnosis and characterization of the disease-associated prion protein and infectious agents, with particular emphasis on atypical forms of these diseases.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank Jérémy Verchère and Dominique Canal for conducting the Western blot experiments; Céline Raynaud, Mikaël Leboidre, and Lionel Daudignon for performing the histopathologic analyses; and Emilie Antier, Clément Lavigne, and Latefa Chouaf-Lakhdar for monitoring the animal experiments. We also acknowledge collaborative work on the L-type case with P.L. Acutis (IZSPLVA-CEA, Italy).

This work was supported by grants from GIS “Infections à prions” and from the Neuroprion network of excellence (FOOD-CT-2004-506579, EUROSTRAINS project).

Top

References

  1. Hartsough  GR, Burger  D. Encephalopathy of mink. I. Epizootiologic and clinical observations. J Infect Dis. 1965;115:387–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Hartung  J, Zimmermann  H, Johannsen  U. Infectious encephalopathy in the mink. 1. Clinical-epizootiological and experimental studies [in German]. Monatsh Veterinarmed. 1970;25:385–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Danilov  EP, Bukina  NS, Akulova  BP. Encephalopathy in mink. Krolikokovod Zverovod. 1974;17:34.
  4. Dukur  II, Geller  VI, Chizhov  VA. Clinical and morphological investigation of transmissible mink encephalopathy. Vopr Virusol. 1986;31:220–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hanson  RP, Eckroade  RJ, Marsh  RF, Zu Rhein  GM, Kanitz  CL, Gustafson  DP. Susceptibility of mink to sheep scrapie. Science. 1971;172:859–61. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Barlow  RM, Rennie  JC. Transmission experiments with a scrapie-like encephalopathy of mink. J Comp Pathol. 1970;80:75–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Robinson  MM, Hadlow  WJ, Knowles  DP, Huff  TP, Lacy  PA, Marsh  RF, Experimental infection of cattle with the agents of transmissible mink encephalopathy and scrapie. J Comp Pathol. 1995;113:241–51. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Marsh  RF, Bessen  RA, Lehmann  S, Hartsough  GR. Epidemiological and experimental studies on a new incident of transmissible mink encephalopathy. J Gen Virol. 1991;72:589–94. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Marsh  RF, Bessen  RA. Epidemiologic and experimental studies on transmissible mink encephalopathy. Dev Biol Stand. 1993;80:111–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Robinson  MM, Hadlow  WJ, Huff  TP, Wells  GA, Dawson  M, Marsh  RF, Experimental infection of mink with bovine spongiform encephalopathy. J Gen Virol. 1994;75:2151–5. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Jacobs  JG, Langeveld  JPM, Biacabe  AG, Acutis  P, Polak  MP, Gavier-Widen  D, Molecular discrimination of atypical bovine spongiform encephalopathies from a wide geographical region in Europe. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45:1821–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Biacabe  AG, Laplanche  JL, Ryder  S, Baron  T. Distinct molecular phenotypes in bovine prion diseases. EMBO Rep. 2004;5:110–5. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Casalone  C, Zanusso  G, Acutis  P, Ferrari  S, Capucci  L, Tagliavini  F, Identification of a second bovine amyloidotic spongiform encephalopathy: molecular similarities with sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:3065–70. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Baron  TG, Biacabe  AG, Bencsik  A, Langeveld  JP. Transmission of new bovine prion to mice. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:1125–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Béringue  V, Bencsik  A, Le Dur  A, Reine  F, Laï  TL, Chenais  N, Isolation from cattle of a prion strain distinct from that causing bovine spongiform encephalopathy. PLoS Pathog. 2006;2:e112. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Buschmann  A, Gretzschel  A, Biacabe  A-G, Schiebel  K, Corona  C, Hoffmann  C, Atypical BSE in Germany. Proof of transmissibility and biochemical characterisation. Vet Microbiol. 2006;117:103–16. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Biacabe  A-G, Jacobs  JG, Bencsik  A, Langeveld  JPM, Baron  T. H-type bovine spongiform encephalopathy: complex molecular features and similarities with human prion diseases. Prion. 2007;1:61–8. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Capobianco  R, Casalone  C, Suardi  S, Mangieri  M, Miccolo  C, Limido  L, Conversion of the BASE prion strain into the BSE strain: the origin of BSE? PLoS Pathog. 2007;3:e31. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Baron  T, Crozet  C, Biacabe  AG, Philippe  S, Verchere  J, Bencsik  A, Molecular analysis of the protease-resistant prion protein in scrapie and bovine spongiform encephalopathy transmitted to ovine transgenic and wild-type mice. J Virol. 2004;78:6243–51. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Cordier  C, Bencsik  A, Philippe  S, Bétemps  D, Ronzon  F, Calavas  D, Transmission and characterization of BSE sources in two ovine transgenic mouse lines (TgOvPrP4 and TgOvPrP59). J Gen Virol. 2006;87:3763–71. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Crozet  C, Bencsik  A, Flamant  F, Lezmi  S, Samarut  J, Baron  T. Florid plaques in ovine PrP transgenic mice infected with an experimental ovine BSE. EMBO Rep. 2001;2:952–6. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Bencsik  A, Philippe  S, Debeer  S, Crozet  C, Calavas  D, Baron  T. Scrapie strain transmission studies in ovine PrP transgenic mice reveal dissimilar susceptibility. Histochem Cell Biol. 2007;127:531–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Baron  T, Biacabe  AG. Origin of bovine spongiform encephalopathy. Lancet. 2006;367:297–8. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Béringue  V, Andréoletti  O, Le Dur  A, Essalmani  R, Vilotte  JL, Lacroux  C, A bovine prion acquires an epidemic BSE strain-like phenotype upon interspecies transmission. J Neurosci. 2007;27:6965–71. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Crozet  C, Flamant  F, Bencsik  A, Aubert  D, Samarut  J, Baron  T. Efficient transmission of two different sheep scrapie isolates in transgenic mice expressing the ovine PrP gene. J Virol. 2001;75:5328–34. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Fraser  H, Dickinson  AG. The sequential development of the brain lesion of scrapie in three strains of mice. J Comp Pathol. 1968;78:301–11. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Bencsik  A, Philippe  S, Vial  L, Calavas  D, Baron  T. Automatic quantitation of vacuolar lesions in the brain of mice infected with transmissible spongiform encephalopathies. J Virol Methods. 2005;124:197–202. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Bencsik  AA, Coleman  AW, Debeer  SO, Perron  H, Moussa  A. Amplified immunohistochemical detection of PrPsc in animal transmissible spongiform encephalopathies using streptomycin. J Histochem Cytochem. 2006;54:849–53. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hamir  AN, Kunkle  RA, Miller  JM, Bartz  JC, Richt  JA. First and second cattle passage of transmissible mink encephalopathy by intracerebral inoculation. Vet Pathol. 2006;43:118–26. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Le Dur  A, Beringue  V, Andreoletti  O, Reine  F, Lai  TL, Baron  T, A newly identified type of scrapie agent can naturally infect sheep with resistant PrP genotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:16031–6. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Bruce  M. Strain typing studies of scrapie and BSE. In: Baker H, Ridley RM, Totowa NJ, editors. Prion diseases. Totawa (NJ): Humana Press; 1996. p. 223–36.
  32. Taylor  DM, Dickinson  AG, Fraser  H, Marsh  RF. Evidence that transmissible mink encephalopathy agent is biologically inactive in mice. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 1986;12:207–15. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Marsh  RF, Burger  D, Eckroade  R, Zu Rhein  GM, Hanson  RP. A preliminary report on the experimental host range of the transmissible mink encephalopathy agent. J Infect Dis. 1969;120:713–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Thomzig  A, Spassov  S, Friedrich  M, Naumann  D, Beekes  M. Discriminating scrapie and bovine spongiform encephalopathy isolates by infrared spectroscopy of pathological prion protein. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:33847–54. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Richt  JA, Kunkle  RA, Alt  D, Nicholson  E. Identification and characterization of two bovine spongiform encephalopathy cases diagnosed in the United States. J Vet Diagn Invest. 2007;19:142–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Richt  J. Atypical bovine spongiform encephalopathy case associated with a prion protein gene mutation. Prion 2006. Strategies, advances and trends towards protection of society. Torino, Italy, 3–6 Oct 2006.
  37. Bruce  ME, Will  RG, Ironside  JW, McConnell  I, Drummond  D, Suttie  A, Transmissions to mice indicate that ‘new variant’ CJD is caused by the BSE agent. Nature. 1997;389:498–501. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Comoy  E. Transmission of bovine amyloidotic spongiform encephalopathy (BASE) to the primate. Prion 2006. Strategies, advances and trends towards protection of society; Torino, Italy; 2006 Oct 3–6.

Top

Figures
Table

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1312.070635

Table of Contents – Volume 13, Number 12—December 2007

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Thierry Baron, AFSSA-Lyon, 31 Avenue Tony Garnier 69364 Lyon, CEDEX 07 France;

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: July 06, 2010
Page updated: July 06, 2010
Page reviewed: July 06, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external