Volume 17, Number 6—June 2011
Dispatch
Salmonella enterica Serotype Typhi with Nonclassical Quinolone Resistance Phenotype
Table 2
Characteristics of the 11 Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi isolates belonging to subpopulation B, France, 2007–2009
| Isolate | Year | Geographic origin | Antimicrobial drug resistance type | Disk diffusion, mm |
MIC, μg/mL |
gyrB | Haplotype | PFGE | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nal | Cip | Nal | Cip | ||||||||
| 97-5123 | 1997 | Unknown | CipDS | 18 [I] | 28 [S] | 8 [S/S] | 0.125 [S/S] | Tyr464 | Non-H58 | X8 | |
| 02-2759 | 2002 | India | CipDS | 19 [I] | 26 [S] | 4 [S/S] | 0.125 [S/S] | Phe464 | H58 | X2 | |
| 05-1578 | 2005 | India | Pansusceptible | 18 [I] | 28 [S] | 8 [S/S] | 0.047 [S/S] | Asp466 | Non-H58 | X6 | |
| 05-2556 | 2005 | India | CipDS | 17 [I] | 31 [S] | 16 [I/S] | 0.19 [S/S] | Phe464 | Non-H58 | X7 | |
| 05-9141 | 2005 | India | CipDS | 17 [I] | 28 [S] | 12 [I/S] | 0.125 [S/S] | Tyr464 | Non-H58 | X3 | |
| 06-426 | 2006 | India | CipDS | 20 [S] | 25 [S] | 8 [S/S] | 0.125 [S/S] | Tyr464 | Non-H58 | X3 | |
| 07-6086 | 2007 | Tunisia | Pansusceptible | 16 [I] | 31 [S] | 16 [I/S] | 0.047 [S/S] | WT | ND | ND | |
| 08-7675† | 2008 | India | ASCSulTmpSXTCipDS | 18 [I] | 28 [S] | 8 [S/S] | 0.125 [S/S] | Phe464 | H58 | X1 | |
| 09-1986† | 2008 | India | ASCSulTmpSXTCipDS | 18 [I] | 27 [S] | 8 [S/S] | 0.125 [S/S] | Phe464 | ND | X1 | |
| 09-0350 | 2009 | Unknown | CipDS | 19 [I] | 27 [S] | 8 [S/S] | 0.125 [S/S] | Phe464 | Non-H58 | X5 | |
| 09-2317 | 2009 | French Guyana | Pansusceptible | 19 [I] | 32 [S] | 8 [S/S] | 0.032 [S/S] | Glu468 | Non-H58 | X4 | |
*PFGE, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis; Nal, nalidixic acid; Cip, ciprofloxacin; WT, wild type; ND, not determined; A, ampicillin; S, streptomycin, C, chloramphenicol; Su, sulfamethoxazole; Tmp, trimethoprim; SXT, cotrimoxazole; CipDS, decreased susceptibility to ciprofloxacin. Disk diffusion test was performed and interpreted ([S], susceptible; [I], intermediate) following recommendations of antibiogram committee of the French Society for Microbiology. MICs were determined by Etest strips, and categorization was made according to the French Society for Microbiology and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute.
†Previously described same patient (13).


