Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

Volume 19, Number 11—November 2013

Letter

Subcutaneous Infection with Dirofilaria spp. Nematode in Human, France

Suggested citation for this article

In Response: We agree with Eberhard (1) that it is difficult to make a species identification when data derived from morphologic examinations do not correlate with those of molecular diagnostics. Errors may be the result of poor indexing of sequences deposited in sequence databases or inaccurate estimation of the degree of genomic polymorphisms within a species and between closely related species. On the other hand, a morphologic difference between 2 organisms, if it is associated with only 1 characteristic, should not be considered sufficient to classify them as 2 distinct species. Such a phenotypic variation may be the result of a single mutation or deletion. Consequently, the absence of a certain character does not exclude the categorization of an organism as a given species.

Molecular identification of the Dirofilaria spp. worm in our clinical case was made on the basis of 2 distinct sequences, each of which exhibited marked differences between D. immitis and D. repens (2). The first sequence targeted internal transcribed spacer regions of ribosomal genes and revealed up to 100% homology with D. immitis sequences from GenBank, whereas a maximum homology of 80% was observed with D. repens sequences from GenBank. The second sequence targeted the cytochrome oxidase 1 gene and showed 100% homology with D. immitis, whereas <90% homology was observed for D. repens. For both analyzed targets, GenBank contained several sequences for D. immitis and D. repens that were deposited by various investigators, and all sequences yielded consistent results. Therefore, there is no basis to suggest that the sequences deposited in GenBank were incorrect.

Nevertheless, we agree that an alternate hypothesis is possible. The worm reported in our article could conceivably belong to a species that differs slightly from both D. immitis and D. repens, displaying morphologic similarities with D. repens but being more closely associated with D. immitis at the genomic level.

Charles MaryComments to Author , Maud Foissac, Matthieu Million, Philippe Parola, and Renaud Piarroux
Author affiliations: Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France (C. Mary, M. Foissac, M. Million, P. Parola, R. Piarroux); Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille (C. Mary, M. Foissac, M. Million, P. Parola)

References

  1. Eberhard ML. Subcutaneous infection with Dirofilaria spp. nematode in human, France [letter]. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19:zzz–zzz. DOI
  2. Foissac M, Million M, Mary C, Dales JP, Souraud JB, Piarroux R, Subcutaneous infection with Dirofilaria immitis nematode in human, France. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19:1712 . DOIPubMed

Suggested citation for this article: Foissac M, Million M, Mary C, Dales J-P, Souraud J-B, Piarroux R, et al. Subcutaneous infection with Dirofilaria spp. nematode in human, France [letter]. Emerg Infect Dis [Internet]. 2013 Nov [date cited]. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1911.131176

DOI: 10.3201/eid1911.131176

Related Links

Table of Contents – Volume 19, Number 11—November 2013

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Charles Mary, Laboratoire de Parasitologie, Hôpital de la Timone, 264 Rue Saint Pierre, 13385 Marseille, France


character(s) remaining.

Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.

TOP