Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

Volume 16, Number 7—July 2010

Research

Deforestation and Malaria in Mâncio Lima County, Brazil

Sarah H. OlsonComments to Author , Ronald Gangnon, Guilherme Abbad Silveira, and Jonathan A. Patz
Author affiliations: University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA (S.H. Olson, R. Gangnon, J.A. Patz); Santo Antônio Energia, Porto Velho, Brazil (G. Silveira)

Suggested citation for this article

Abstract

Malaria is the most prevalent vector-borne disease in the Amazon. We used malaria reports for health districts collected in 2006 by the Programa Nacional de Controle da Malária to determine whether deforestation is associated with malaria incidence in the county (município) of Mâncio Lima, Acre State, Brazil. Cumulative percent deforestation was calculated for the spatial catchment area of each health district by using 60 × 60–meter, resolution-classified imagery. Statistical associations were identified with univariate and multivariate general additive negative binomial models adjusted for spatial effects. Our cross-sectional study shows malaria incidence across health districts in 2006 is positively associated with greater changes in percentage of cumulative deforestation within respective health districts. After adjusting for access to care, health district size, and spatial trends, we show that a 4.3%, or 1 SD, change in deforestation from August 1997 through August 2000 is associated with a 48% increase of malaria incidence.

Malaria risk in the Amazon and around the malaria belt is an integrated mix of environmental and sociodemographic risk factors (13). Despite >50 years of malaria control efforts from 1997 through 2006, on average, Brazil had ≈500,000 confirmed cases annually (4,5). Most malaria cases in Brazil occur in the Amazon Basin, where logging rates between 1999 and 2002 ranged from 12,000 to 20,000 km2 per year, the sum of which would cover the country of Denmark (6).

The main vectors of malaria in the Amazon, Anopheles darlingi mosquitoes, seek out larval habitat in partially sunlit areas, with clear water of neutral pH and aquatic plant growth, and they are notably present and more abundant in altered landscapes (79). In Peru, A. darlingi mosquitoes are seldom observed in standing water bodies within undisturbed forests because they are shaded and soils are more acidic, and yet these forests remain abundant and rich in mosquito species that do not transmit malaria (9,10). Along the Iquitos–Nauta Road corridor entomologic risk factors of mosquito biting rate and larval count increase with more deforestation. The mean biting rate in areas with >80% deforestation was 8.33 compared with 0.03 per night for sites with <30% deforestation (10). Furthermore, the likelihood of finding A. darlingi larvae doubled in breeding sites with <20% forest compared with sites with 20%–60% forest, and the likelihood increased 7-fold when compared with sites with >60% forest (8). Human-altered landscapes provide a milieu of suitable larval habitats for A. darling mosquitoes, including road ditches, dams, mining pits, culverts, vehicle ruts, and areas of poor clearing.

The characteristics of these mosquitoes’ preferred habitat and studies of human and entomologic malaria risk suggest that deforestation and land clearing contribute to the dynamic malaria patterns along the frontier of settlement. Frontier malaria theory explains this pattern in new settlements as follows: an initial epidemic occurs that abates to persistent low incidence and eventually eradication as the result of changing social, ecologic, and environmental relationships (11). For instance, from 1985 through 1995, malaria risk in Rondônia increased during the initial colonization phase due to ecosystem transformations that promoted larval habitats and then gradually subsided as urban area expanded, agriculture became established, settlers became more knowledgeable, access to healthcare increased, home construction improved, and suitable larval habitats declined, until, finally, malaria risk was mostly linked to human behavioral factors (2,12). Frontier malaria theory is further supported by research around the Granada area in Acre, where a population-based cohort study found land clearing activities and <5 years of residence associated with higher probability of PCR-confirmed malaria morbidity (13).

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Mâncio Lima is the westernmost county in Brazil. The 2006 malaria incidence (cases/person) is mapped according to health districts (n = 54).

Figure 1. Mâncio Lima is the westernmost county in Brazil. The 2006 malaria incidence (cases/person) is mapped according to health districts (n = 54).

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Deforestation trends in Mâncio Lima, Brazil, based on PRODES (Programa de Cálculo do Desflorestamento da Amazônia) 60 × 60–meter classified satellite imagery. The health districts are outlined in black. Baseline deforestation that occurred in 1997 is orange, deforestation that occurred between 1997 and 2006 is light brown, nonforested land is blue, and forested land is green.

Figure 2. Deforestation trends in Mâncio Lima, Brazil, based on PRODES (Programa de Cálculo do Desflorestamento da Amazônia) 60 × 60–meter classified satellite imagery. The health districts are outlined in black. Baseline deforestation...

In this 2006 cross-sectional study, we examined the association of deforestation, socioeconomic and demographic factors, and malaria at the level of health districts (localidades) using a uniform surveillance tool implemented in 2003 by the Brazilian Ministry of Health's Programa Nacional de Controle da Malária (PNCM). This nationally standardized system covers 5.1 million km2 of the malaria belt and reports monthly malaria statistics for >7,000 health districts. The surveillance system uses a 40-item questionnaire that includes items concerning patient demographics, diagnosis, and area of residence (14). The spatial, temporal, and overall quality of this surveillance program, combined with spatial mapping, presents an opportunity to identify ecologic risk factors within an extensive existing surveillance network. Our hypothesis was that deforestation is positively associated with higher malaria risk in health districts in Mâncio Lima, Acre State, Brazil (Figures 1, 2). We also examined the association of 2006 malaria incidence with socioeconomic and demographic factors, including age, access to care, method of surveillance, sex, and malaria type.

Materials and Methods

Study Area

Mâncio Lima (4,672 km2) is situated in Acre State and is the westernmost county in Brazil, sharing a border with Peru to the west and Amazonas State to the north. Between 2000 and 2008, the population of the county increased 30% from 11,095 to 14,387. The county has 4% more men than women and a mixture of rural (48%) and urban (52%) households (15). The 67% of the territory that is considered uninhabited is made up of the Nukini and Poyanawa Indigenous Reserves and a portion of the Serra do Divisor National Park. The rural economy is based on agriculture and manioc flour production, and no areas have been licensed for mining exploration (1618). Mâncio Lima has an average 4–30 cm monthly precipitation range and 19°C–32°C average monthly temperature range (19). The city of Mâncio Lima, which is the administrative and main population center, is connected by highway to Curzeiro do Sul, 24 km to the east. In 2006, Cruzeiro do Sul and Mâncio Lima ranked second and fourth highest, respectively, for malaria risk, and combined they reported 12.5% of all malaria cases in Brazil (20).

Health Data

Since 2003, PNCM has practiced a malaria control strategy that reports all suspected malaria cases, identified from both slide-confirmed passive and active surveillance, for local health districts, which are often points of care. For each case, the survey tool records date, age (<10 years), sex, whether or not care was received within 48 hours of symptom onset, malaria type (Plasmodium vivax or P. falciparum; we classified mixed infections as falciparum), and method of surveillance (passive or active). In addition, the malaria case report form includes voluntary questions on education level and occupation type (14). We screened for patients who were residents of the health district in which they sought treatment and extracted monthly and annual percentages of these records from the Information System of Epidemiologic Surveillance of Malaria (SIVEP MALÁRIA) for the county of Mâncio Lima using Tableau 4.0 (www.tableausoftware.com) and Excel version 11.3 (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA).

Remote Sensing

In 2006, health district boundaries in Mâncio Lima were initially drawn by health district field staff and then mapped in real time with a GPS Garmin 12XL (Garmin International, Inc., Olathe, KS, USA). Then Track Maker 13.0 (www.gpstm.com) and ArcView 3.2 (www.esri.com) software were used to convert the paths into 54 health district polygons, and the population of each health district was enumerated. Next, the geographic data of each health district was linked to SIVEP MALÁRIA data. The uninhabited portion of the county, including the indigenous reserves and the national park, was divided into 3 geographic areas and excluded from data analysis (21).

Classified deforestation estimates at 60 × 60–meter resolution from 1997, and 2000 through 2006 were downloaded from the Programa de Cálculo do Desflorestamento da Amazônia (PRODES) in the National Institute for Space Research (22) (Figure 2). PRODES processes photographic images and Landsat imagery acquired at 30 × 30–meter resolution and is considered the gold standard reference for spatial deforestation data (23,24). The classification of deforestation in PRODES is cumulative; once a unit is deforested, it does not revert back to forest (25). Subsequently, in our analysis, we do not consider the effects of regrowth. ArcMap version 9.3 (www.esri.com) was used to calculate the health district geometric center and the amount of deforestation observed in 1997 and during 2000–2006.

Analysis and Modeling

Summary statistics of variables from the SIVEP-MALÂRIA database for 2006 and deforestation data were calculated and mapped according to the geographic boundaries of the health districts. Numbers of malaria cases in 2006 for each health district were modeled by using a negative binomial (overdispersed Poisson) generalized additive regression model with a log-link function. For each health district, (log) census population for 2006 was included in the model as an offset term. Geographic location (latitude/longitude) was included in all models as a penalized 2-dimensional thin plate regression spline with smoothing parameter chosen by generalized cross-validation (26). Initial models considered deforestation and social or demographic variables to the above model individually.

A multivariable model was constructed in a stepwise fashion based on optimizing Akaike information criterion (AIC) (27). As before, the dependent variable was the number of malaria cases in 2006 for each health district and (log) census population for 2006 was included as an offset term. Deforestation variables of interest included absolute deforestation in 1997, absolute deforestation in 2006, percentage of deforestation in 1997, percentage of deforestation in 2006, and percentage change in deforestation during 1997–2006, 1997–2005, 1997–2004, 1997–2003, 1997–2002, 1997–2001, 1997–2000, 2001–2006, 2002–2006, 2003–2006, 2004–2006, and 2005–2006. Percentage of deforestation change was calculated by obtaining the percentage difference of deforestation in each health district between 2 time points. Social and demographic risk factors included percentage of malaria cases detected through active surveillance, percentage of malaria patients who received access to care in <48 hours of symptom onset, percentage of malaria patients <10 years of age, percentage of malaria patients who are male, and percentage of falciparum malaria cases. Interactions between variables selected as main effects in the stepwise model were also considered. Relative risks are presented for a ±1 SD change in the risk factor. Residual spatial autocorrelation was assessed by using Moran I with k = 4 distance-based neighbors. A 2-sided p value of 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Maps, statistical analysis, and figures were completed in R version 2.9.2 and Adobe Illustrator version 10.0.3 (www.adobe.com) (28).

Results

Figure 3

Thumbnail of Box-and-whisker plots of slide-confirmed malaria cases on a logarithmic scale by health districts in Mâncio Lima, Brazil, 2003–2008. Error bars indicate interquartile ranges, and thick horizontal bars indicate the median.

Figure 3. Box-and-whisker plots of slide-confirmed malaria cases on a logarithmic scale by health districts in Mâncio Lima, Brazil, 2003–2008. Error bars indicate interquartile ranges, and thick horizontal bars indicate the median.

Figure 4

Thumbnail of Cloropleth maps of selected malaria risk factors for health districts in Mâncio Lima, Brazil. A) Resident population in health districts in 2006. B) Percentage of slide-confirmed malaria cases receiving access to care within the first 48 hours of symptom onset in 2006. C) Percentage of 1997 deforestation in each of the health districts calculated from 60 × 60-meter resolution classified PRODES data. D) Cumulative percentage change in deforestation by health district from 1997 to 200

Figure 4. Cloropleth maps of selected malaria risk factors for health districts in Mâncio Lima, Brazil. A) Resident population in health districts in 2006. B) Percentage of slide-confirmed malaria cases receiving access to...

Fifty-four health districts occupy 27% (1,270/4,760 km2) of Mâncio Lima and spatially reflect the population settlements along 2 dominant river channels and in the urban zone around the city of Mâncio Lima. In 2006, the health districts reported a total of 15,437 slide-confirmed malaria cases, a mixture of both falciparum (41%) and vivax (59%) malaria. Most malaria patients across health districts were males (56%) >10 years of age (72%); the cases were identified by active surveillance (65%), and the patients received access to care within 48 hours of symptom onset (71%). The average incidence rate of the malaria epidemic was 1.16 cases/person, but within individual districts, the incidence was 0.4–12 cases/person (Figures 1, 3). We were unable to analyze answers to categorical questions on the education level and activities of case-patient activities within the previous 2 weeks because the response rates were insufficient. Choropleth maps depicting population distribution, access to care, malaria incidence, and percentage of deforestation change during 1996–2006 are shown in Figure 4.

Baseline deforestation in 1997 was concentrated within and near the city of Mâncio Lima, with varying degrees of deforestation found in the health districts along the river ways. The most deforestation change between 1997 and 2006 was located just west and south of the city. Over this period, percentage of deforestation in health districts increased, on average, 6.6%–26%. The SD of this increase is 5.9% (Table). Notably, a large wetland area northeast of the city limited the amount of land clearing taking place in that area (Figures 2,4).

The univariate analysis adjusts for variability between the health districts, and spatial trend. We show the influence of ecologic deforestation and social demographic risk factors on malaria incidence. Percentage of deforestation during 1997–2000 is the factor most predictive of malaria risk in the health districts on the basis of model AIC. Health districts that deforested 4.3% (±1 SD) from 1997 to 2000 are associated with 1.33 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12–1.58) increase in malaria risk. Historic baseline deforestation in 1997 is not significant, but malaria risk and percentage deforestation from 1997–2002, 1997–2001, and 1997–2000 are significant and positively correlated. More recent percentage deforestation changes from 2001 through 2006 are not associated with malaria risk, along with 1997 and 2000–2006 measures of absolute deforestation and cumulative percent deforestation (Table).

Although these results were not quite significant in the univariate analysis, the risk of malaria is 1.27 (95% CI 0.97–1.66) when active surveillance increases by 19% within a health district. Malaria risk is 1.18 (95% CI 0.87–1.59) when 14% of more cases obtain care within the first 48 hours of symptoms. The spatial size of health districts is also nearly significant as the relative malaria risk is 1.20 (95% CI 0.97–1.48) for a 32 km2 increase in health district size. Associations with malaria risk based on age, sex, or malaria type are not significant (Table).

Figure 5

Thumbnail of Joint relative risk plot of access to care and health district spatial area, Mâncio Lima, Brazil. Contour lines indicate the joint relative risk for standard deviation changes in percentage access to care and health district spatial area. Open circles are the observed percentage access to care and health district spatial area size data pairs for the 54 health districts. The contour line increment of relative risk is 0.2, increasing with the shading from red to white.

Figure 5. Joint relative risk plot of access to care and health district spatial area, Mâncio Lima, Brazil. Contour lines indicate the joint relative risk for standard deviation changes in percentage access to...

Figure 6

Thumbnail of Multivariate model residual map, Mâncio Lima, Brazil.

Figure 6. Multivariate model residual map, Mâncio Lima, Brazil.

The multivariate analysis shows a 4.3% increase in the percentage of deforestation between 1997 and 2000 is associated with a malaria risk of 1.48 (95% CI 1.26–1.75) after access to care and the spatial area of the health districts are adjusted for (Table). Figure 5 shows the interaction and joint relative risk of percentage access to care and the spatial area on malaria incidence within each health district adjusted for percentage deforestation from 1997 through 2000. In Mâncio Lima, malaria risk decreases as the percentage of access to healthcare increases for health districts <23.9 km2 (mean value). The pattern of relative risk in health districts of larger size is less clear, due to a shortage of observations. A map of the model residuals did not show any spatial trends; the global spatial autocorrelation of the residuals based on Moran’s I is –0.12 and not significant (p = 0.90) (Figure 6).

Discussion

We based our investigation of environmental and sociodemographic malaria risk factors on an existing surveillance system and estimated the relative risk for these factors at the health district level. Malaria surveillance in Brazil is unprecedented in scale and uniformity. Focusing on 1 county linked to global information systems health district level data, we report the characteristics of the health districts, map the distribution of risk factors, and find significant associations between deforestation and malaria incidence. Adjusting for population, access to care, and district size, we found that malaria risk increased ≈50% in health districts when 4% of the area underwent deforestation in 1997–2000.

Our approach shows the relative associations of malaria incidence and deforestation patterns across space, rather than a trend of malaria incidence and deforestation across time. The model assumes annual regional variability in temporal risk factors, such as climate and intervention measures, was uniform for the 2006 observations. We examined measures of deforestation before 2006 to model the pattern of malaria observed in 2006. However, given the cross sectional design, the association of malaria incidence to prior deforestation does not necessarily imply a causal trajectory of increased deforestation and elevated malaria incidence.

We found that the univariate models predict that a higher malaria risk is associated with more active surveillance and access to care. This seems counterintuitive, as active surveillance generally identifies cases quickly, which leads to faster treatment and lower disease risk, and access to care is a variable reliably associated with lower disease rates. For example, in the Indian state of Assam, malaria incidence is consistently lower in villages within 5 km of healthcare facilities (29). The univariate relative risks suggest that increased active surveillance and access to healthcare during the epidemic led to the identification of cases that normally would have gone unreported. The significant interaction of health district size and access to care improved the performance of the multivariate model for percentage of deforestation from 1997 through 2000, health district size, and access to care. The interaction and joint relative risk show that increased surveillance in health districts <23 km2 is protective against malaria risk, after adjusting for percentage of deforestation.

The landscape establishes local ecology and biodiversity, and our results confirm that cleared land is associated with a higher malaria risk. This association has been identified in previous research, but here we link the ecologic observations of the habitat preference of A. darlingi mosquitoes for deforested areas to an existing malaria surveillance program. Moreover, we found that human malaria risk is specifically associated with deforestation 5–10 years previously. We did not find an association with deforestation before or after that time frame. These findings seem to agree with other research that observed that shrub land cover, which develops 5 years after deforestation and becomes classified as secondary growth ≈15 years after deforestation, has significantly greater abundance of A. darlingi larvae than does forested land (8). Together these findings suggest that entomologic risk is based on the fate of cleared land.

The study is limited by several factors. The malaria data are based on annual percentage measures derived from the PNCM malaria surveillance questionnaire. Each health district was the unit of analysis, so we were unable to adjust for risk factors at the individual case level. The categorical data structure was restrictive and there was insufficient reporting on voluntary portions of the survey that limited our ability to adjust for socioeconomic drivers. The frequency of double reporting is unknown, but we have filtered the data for only those patients who reported living within the health district where they sought treatment. Temperature is nearly always suitable for malaria transmission in the Amazon Basin, but any variability of rainfall and hydrologic characteristics in Mâncio Lima may also be a confounding factor (30).

Another consideration is the absence of current immigration information, but several observations suggest that migration is an unlikely factor in explaining malaria patterning in this study site. In 2006 there were a total of 750,000 emigrants living in the Northern Region, which encompasses the states of Acre, Amazonas, Anapá, Roraima, Rondônia, Pará, and Tocantins. This represents just 4% of all emigrants to new regions within Brazil based on place of birth. More locally in 2000, Máncio Lima recorded an influx of just 29 emigrants >5 years of age since 1995 from areas outside of Acre, or just 0.2% of all migration to Acre (15). These trends suggest that a minimal amount of migration to Mâncio Lima occurred before 2006.

The emerging local aquaculture industry is an important concern that might also be correlated with the deforestation patterns in health districts. Pond, wells, or fish farms >50 m in circumference significantly increase the abundance of A. darlingi larvae (9). Mâncio Lima's aquaculture production has been growing since this association was established in 2003. The ponds ranged size from 5 ha to 175 ha, and the April 2007 harvest yielded 30,000 kg of fish, valued at R$216,000 or US$106,000 (31). Taking the 2007 harvest at a yield obtained in the neighboring state of Amazônia of ≈70 kg/ha/year, suggests that ≈430 ha of aquaculture existed in Mâncio Lima in 2006 (32). Fish farms are often located in degraded and deforested lands, yet this practice maybe leading to more mosquito larval habitat and higher malaria incidence. Further investigation is needed to differentiate deforestation from the effects of fish farming.

Our models assume that environmental exposures occurred in the health district in which a patient claims residency. If persons slept and worked in different areas, we could not directly associate exposure with environmental variables within the health district. However, the diurnal biting pattern of A. darling mosquitoes, which generally peaks in the evening and sometimes in the early morning, means most exposure will occur near the home (7,10,33). Additionally, we were not able to adjust for the presence or absence of the agent, plasmodium sporozoites, yet the county was saturated with malaria at the peak of an epidemic, which increased the probability of widespread malaria exposure. In a scenario in which A. darlingi mosquitoes are very abundant but the parasite is absent, once the malaria sporozoite is introduced, malaria should spread.

We showed how the framework of health districts can link landscape and disease risk, but the overall generalizability of our findings is limited. In the Amazon, patterns of malaria risk factors are known to change from 1 community to the next. We found that age and sex were not associated with malaria risk in Mâncio Lima, yet men carry double the risk of women in some communities, and in others, gold miners have a risk 3 times higher than that of urban residents (34). Another community has no age-specific, occupational, or gender risks, but activities such as strolling outdoors after 6:00 pm and waking before 6:00 am for adults, and attending church services in the evening for children are significantly associated with malaria risk (35). Beyond the Amazon, evidence has shown that mosquito survival can depend on slight variations in temperatures, humidity, and sunlight as a result of deforestation (36,37). Even though eradication of malaria is a reemerging priority of the global health community, no spatially standardized approach has been developed that can monitor patterns of malaria at the clinic or treatment unit (38).

At present, policy makers and epidemiologists continue to speculate about the regional and local variation of malaria and malaria risk factors. But policy makers also know that, “policies are sometimes applied more broadly than appropriate to large regions when it may actually only be relevant to a particular setting within the region … (and) policies often need to be specific to be useful” (38, p. 95). Currently, beyond our findings in Mâncio Lima and a few isolated studies, the ultimate relationship and geographic extent of the malaria incidence and deforestation process are unknown.

Our findings illustrate the importance of relative deforestation between health districts in the county of Mâncio Lima, but they do not necessarily explain the overall intensity of the 2006 epidemic (Figure 3). The epidemic is likely a result of a combination of forces with deforestation (and perhaps aquaculture) creating the landscape conditions more suitable to A. darlingi mosquitoes. The extensive drought of 2005 may also have contributed to higher mosquito populations and malaria risk (39). This conclusion is supported by studies of El Niño events, caused by warming sea surface temperatures, which decreased precipitation in the region and are associated with higher malaria incidence the following year in Venezuela and Guyana (40). Here we show that deforestation significantly affects malaria risk, which suggests that land use measures may be 1 method to employ in malaria control.

In summary, we show that focused monitoring and high resolution spatial mapping of health districts can identify ecologic associations between malaria incidence and deforestation. Other human health and ecology linkages may be discernable with similar high resolution and spatially explicit data.

Dr Olson recently completed a joint PhD from the University of Wisconsin–Madison in population health from the School of Medicine and Population Health and in environment and resources from the Nelson Institute. Her research addresses regional landscape and climate links in the ecology of vector-borne infectious diseases.

Acknowledgments

We extend our warm thanks for the comments and suggestions made by anonymous reviewers and for data shared by Eduardo Marques Macário.

This study was supported by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Large-Scale Biosphere-Atmosphere Experiment in Amazonia program. An IRB research exemption was requested and received from the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

References

  1. Gurgel HdC. Malaria and environmental dynamics in the state of Roraima, Brazil [in French]: University of Paris X Nanterre; 2006.
  2. de Castro MC, Monte-Mór RL, Sawyer D, Singer BH. Malaria risk on the Amazon frontier. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:24527.[REMOVED HYPERLINK FIELD] DOIPubMed
  3. Packard RM. The making of a tropical disease: a short history of malaria. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2007.
  4. Ministry of Health. Brazil. Situation of malaria epidemiology in Brazil in 2007 [in Portuguese]. Brasilia (Brazil): Ministry of Health; 2008.
  5. Silveira AC, de Rezende DF. Evaluation of the overall integrated control of malaria in Brazil [in Portuguese]. Brasilia (Brazil): Pan American Health Organization; 2001.
  6. Asner GP, Knapp DE, Broadbent EN, Oliveira PJC, Keller M, Silva JN. Selective logging in the Brazilian Amazon. Science. 2005;310:4802. DOIPubMed
  7. Charlwood JD. Biological variation in Anopheles darlingi Root. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1996;91:3918.PubMed
  8. Vittor AY, Pan W, Gilman RH, Tielsch J, Glass G, Shields T, Linking deforestation to malaria in the Amazon: characterization of the breeding habitat of the principal malaria vector, Anopheles darlingi. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009;81:512.PubMed
  9. Tadei WP, Thatcher BD, Santos JM, Scarpassa VM, Rodrigues IB, Rafael MS. Ecologic observations on anopheline vectors of malaria in the Brazilian Amazon. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1998;59:32535.PubMed
  10. Vittor AY, Gilman RH, Tielsch J, Glass G, Shields T, Lozano WS, The effect of deforestation on the human-biting rate of Anopheles darlingi, the primary vector of falciparum malaria in the Peruvian Amazon. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;74:311.PubMed
  11. Sawyer D. Frontier malaria in the Amazon region of Brazil: types of malaria situations and some implications for control. Brasilia (Brazil): Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization/The Special Programme for Research Training in Tropical Diseases; 1988.
  12. Singer BH, De Castro MC. Agricultural colonization and malaria on the Amazon frontier. Population Health and Aging. New York: New York Academy of Sciences; 2001. p. 184–222.
  13. da Silva-Nunes M, Codeco CT, Malafronte RS, da Silva NS, Juncansen C, Muniz PT, Malaria on the Amazonian frontier: transmission dynamics, risk factors, spatial distribution, and prospects for control. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008;79:62435.PubMed
  14. Ministry of Health. Brazil. Secretariat of Health Surveillance. National program for prevention and control of Malaria [in Portuguese]. Brasilia (Brazil): Ministry of Health; 2003.
  15. Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics. Census: Brasil, 2000 [in Portuguese]. Rio de Janeiro: Department of Population and Social Indicators; 2000.
  16. Toni F. Forest management in Brazi’s Amazonian municipalities. In: Ferroukhi L, editor. Municipal forest management in Latin America. San José (Costa Rica): Center for International Forestry Research and the International Development Research Centre; 2003.
  17. Superintendant of the Manaus Free Zone. Potentialities of the State of Acre. 1999 [cited 2009 Oct 14]. http://www.suframa.gov.br/publicacoes/potencialidades/ingles/Acre/acre.htm
  18. Barreto P, Souza CJ, Anderson A, Salomão R, Wiles J, Noguerón R. Human pressure on the Brazilian Amazon. State of the Amazon. 2005;2005:1–6.
  19. Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics. Profile of Brazilian municipalities: searching for information on base municipals 1999 [in Portuguese]. Rio de Janeiro: Department of Population and Social Indicators; 2001.
  20. Ministry of Health. Brazil. Secretariat of Health Surveillance. Technical reports of malaria SIVEP and SIH/SUS in January–October comparing 2005 and 2006 [in Portuguese]. Brasilia (Brazil): National Program for Prevention and Control of Malaria; 2006.
  21. Macário EM, Dimech GS, Araujo WN. Ladislau JLdB, Braz RM, Ramalho WM. Using a geographic information system for malaria surveillance [in Portuguese]. First meeting of the scientific program of training in epidemiology applied to SUS; 2007. Brasilia (Brazil); Ministry of Health; 2007.
  22. National Institute for Space Research. PRODES project: monitoring the Brazilian Amazon forest by satellite [in Portuguese]. São Paulo (Brazil); The Institute; 2009.
  23. Asner GP, Broadbent EN, Oliveira PJC, Keller M, Knapp DE, Silva JNM. Condition and fate of logged forests in the Brazilian Amazon. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:1294750. DOIPubMed
  24. Câmara G, de Morrisson Vaeriano D, Soares JV. Methodology for the calculation of annual deforestation rates in the Amazon [in Portuguese]. São Paulo (Brazil): National Institute for Space Research; 2006.
  25. Motta MD, Cordeiro JPC, Valeriano DM. Using LEGAL—Map Algebra—as a tool to support estimation of Amazonian deforestation. São Paulo (Brazil): National Institute for Space Research; 2004.
  26. Wood SN. Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. Boca Raton (FL): Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2006.
  27. Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automat Contr. 1974;19:71623. DOI
  28. R: The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Version 2.9.2. Vienna (Austria): The Foundation; 2009.
  29. Dev V, Phookan S, Sharma VP, Anand SP. Physiographic and entomologic resk factors of malaria in Assam, India. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004;71:4516.PubMed
  30. Olson SH, Gangnon R, Elguero E, Durieux L, Guegan JF, Foley JA, Links between climate, malaria, and wetlands in the Amazon Basin. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:65962.[REMOVED HYPERLINK FIELD] DOIPubMed
  31. Duarte RBdA. Success stories: agribusiness: aquaculture and fisheries [in Portuguese]. Brasilia (Brazil): Support for Micro and Small Business in Acre (Sebrae/AC); 2007.
  32. Federation of Industries in the State of Amazonas. Aquaculture. [cited 2009 Oct 13]. http://www.fieam-amazonas.org.br
  33. Tadei WP, Dutary Thatcher B. Malaria vectors in the Brazilian Amazon: Anopheles of the subgenus Nyssorhynchus (1). Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2000;42:8794. DOIPubMed
  34. Duarte EC, Gyorkos TW, Pang L, Abrahamowicz M. Epidemiology of malaria in a hypoendemic Brazilian Amazon migrant population: a cohort study. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2004;70:22937.PubMed
  35. Roper MH, Torres RSC, Goicochea CGC, Andersen EM, Guarda JSA, Calampa C, The epidemiology of malaria in an epidemic area of the Peruvian Amazon. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2000;62:24756.[REMOVED HYPERLINK FIELD]PubMed
  36. Tuno N, Githeko AK, Nakayama T, Minakawa N, Takagi M, Yan GY. The association between the phytoplankton, Rhopalosolen species (Chlorophyta; Chlorophyceae), and Anopheles gambiae sensu lato (Diptera: Culicidae) larval abundance in western Kenya. Ecol Res. 2006;21:47682. DOI
  37. Afrane YA, Lawson BW, Githeko AK, Yan GY. Effects of microclimatic changes caused by land use and land cover on duration of gonotrophic cycles of Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: culicidae) in western Kenya highlands. J Med Entomol. 2005;42:97480.[REMOVED HYPERLINK FIELD] DOIPubMed
  38. Roll Back Malaria Partnership. The global malaria action plan for a malaria-free world. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.
  39. Marengo JA, Nobre CA, Tomasella J, Cardoso MF, Oyama MD. Hydro-climate and ecological behaviour of the drought of Amazonia in 2005. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008;363:17738. DOIPubMed
  40. Gagnon AS, Smoyer-Tomic KE, Bush ABG. The El Niño Southern Oscillation and malaria epidemics in South America. Int J Biometeorol. 2002;46:819. DOIPubMed

Figures

Table

Suggested citation for this article: Olson SH, Gangnon R, Silveira G, Patz JA. Deforestation and malaria in Mâncio Lima County, Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet]. 2010 Jul [date cited]. Available from http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/16/7/09-1785

DOI: 10.3201/eid1607.091785

Table of Contents – Volume 16, Number 7—July 2010

Comments to the Authors

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Sarah H. Olson, University of Wisconsin, 1710 University Ave, Madison, WI 53726, USA

character(s) remaining.

Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.

Comments to the EID Editors

Please contact the EID Editors via our Contact Form.

TOP