Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 29, Number 7—July 2023
Dispatch

Tuberculosis Infection among Non–US-Born Persons and Persons ≥60 Years of Age, United States, 2019–2020

Author affiliation: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Cite This Article

Abstract

We examined tuberculosis (TB) infection results for the United States from the 2019–2020 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Over this period, 10% of non–US-born persons and 7% of those >60 years of age tested positive for TB infection. These results provide up-to-date information on TB infection among study subpopulations.

Each year, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) collects demographic and clinical data for tuberculosis (TB) disease cases reported from all 50 states and the District of Columbia (1). Studies that examined the completeness and accuracy of the national TB surveillance system found that this reporting consistently and accurately captured close to 100% of all diagnosed cases and is therefore highly representative of the burden of TB disease in the United States (24).

The precursor to TB disease, latent TB infection (LTBI), is not a reportable condition in most US states (5), so the number of infected persons is not well understood. Beginning in 1970, CDC funded a TB component of several National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (NHANES) that provide the primary source of national data on LTBI in the US population (68). Most recently, CDC provided funding for the 2019–2020 NHANES survey to examine LTBI among non–US-born persons >6 years of age and all persons >60 years of age. The 2019–2020 NHANES protocol was reviewed and approved by the NCHS Ethics Review Board (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/irba98.htm).

NHANES is a series of sequentially run cross-sectional surveys that assess the health of the civilian, noninstitutionalized US population (9). To obtain a nationally representative sample, NHANES employs a complex, stratified, multistage probability cluster sampling design (9). The sample for the NHANES 2019–2020 survey cycle was intended to be nationally representative and included 30 primary sampling units (10). However, 2019–2020 NHANES data collection was suspended in mid-March 2020 because of the COVID-19 pandemic. At that time, data collection had been completed in only 18 of 30 primary sampling units. Because data collection was incomplete, calculating survey weights for that partial cycle was not possible, and the sample was therefore not nationally representative. As a result, only an unweighted partial dataset from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) Research Data Center was available for analysis.

The Study

Non–US-born 2019–2020 NHANES study participants >6 years of age and all study participants >60 years of age were eligible to be tested for TB infection using an interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA), QuantiFERON-TB Gold Plus (QIAGEN, https://www.qiagen.com). We selected those specific subpopulations of persons because of their high IGRA test positivity in previous studies (8,11), the potential for complications of TB disease in the >60 age group, and the high risk of LTBI progressing to TB disease among non–US-born persons (11). We excluded persons in those subpopulations who did not undergo phlebotomy as part of the routine NHANES exam. Data for coexisting conditions were not available in the 2019–2020 NHANES dataset (12). All IGRA test results were provided by a single Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act–certified laboratory. Qualitative results were reported for each IGRA test result based on criteria provided by the manufacturer. We used R statistical software (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, https://www.R-project.org) to obtain frequencies and percentages of eligible NHANES participants with positive TB test results by demographic characteristics. Because of NCHS confidentiality policy, Research Data Center results were suppressed for all categories and subcategories that had <5 responses (13).

In the 2019–2020 NHANES study, 837 non–US-born participants >6 years of age were tested for TB infection, of whom 85 (10%) had positive TB test results (Table). Among non–US-born study participants who tested positive for TB, 51% (43/85) identified as non-Hispanic Asian and 35% (30) as Hispanic; 79% (67) had been in the United States for >5 years. In comparison, among all non–US-born study participants (irrespective of TB test results), 35% (290) identified as non-Hispanic Asian and 43% (356) as Hispanic.

Among the NHANES study participants who were >60 years of age (including both US-born and non–US-born persons), 1,123 were tested for TB, among whom 81 (7%) had positive TB test results (Table). Among those who tested positive for TB, 43% (35) identified as non-Hispanic Black. Among study participants >60 years of age, those with TB-positive test results were less likely than the overall total to identify as non-Hispanic White (21% vs. 44%), more likely to be living in poverty (17.3% vs. 14.4%), less likely to have at least a high school diploma (32.1% vs. 20.5%), and more likely to have been born outside the United States (29.6% vs. 15.9%).

All TB-positive non–US-born NHANES study participants >6 years of age and TB-positive participants >60 years of age were more likely to identify within racial and ethnic minority groups, not have at least a high school diploma, and be living in poverty than overall study participants in each of those subpopulations. In addition, participants >60 years of age who tested positive for TB were more likely to have been born outside the United States than overall study participants >60 years of age. Although not directly comparable across studies, data from our study about demographic differences between TB-positive and overall study participants for both subpopulations were consistent with previous research (8,11).

Comparing data between the 2019–2020 and previous NHANES studies was also limited by a change in the way participants were classified into US-born or non–US-born categories. For the 2019–2020 survey cycle, NHANES study participants were considered US-born if born in a state or the District of Columbia within the United States or in a US-affiliated territory; for the 2011–2012 study, participants born in a US-affiliated territory were considered non–US-born. Because country of birth is one of the most critical stratification factors for examining characteristics of LTBI, defining country of birth consistently will be essential in future NHANES survey cycles that include TB testing.

Conclusions

Although the 2019–2020 NHANES TB test results were not representative of the US population, study data still indicate that TB infection remains a critical health screening consideration among non–US-born persons and persons >60 years of age. Therefore, persons in these subpopulations should be prioritized for TB testing and, if TB infection is diagnosed, treated with an appropriate regimen to prevent progression to active TB disease (14,15). Furthermore, the likely disruption of testing and treatment of TB infection that occurred because of the COVID pandemic suggests we still have much to do if we are to eliminate TB in the United States (1).

Ms. Woodruff is a health scientist with the Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta. She works on research and programmatic activities that support TB control and elimination in the United States. Mr. Miramontes is chief of the Data Management, Statistics and Evaluation Branch, Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta.

Top

Acknowledgment

We thank Wanjun Cui for her assistance.

Top

References

  1. Filardo  TD, Feng  PJ, Pratt  RH, Price  SF, Self  JL. Tuberculosis—United States, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022;71:4416. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Viner  K, Johnson  CC, Newbern  EC, Dickman  B, Dettinger  L, Waller  K, et al.; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Assessment of declines in reported tuberculosis cases—Georgia and Pennsylvania, 2009. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60:33842. PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Winston  CA, Navin  TR, Becerra  JE, Chen  MP, Armstrong  LR, Jeffries  C, et al. Unexpected decline in tuberculosis cases coincident with economic recession—United States, 2009. BMC Public Health. 2011;11:846. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Yelk Woodruff  RS, Pratt  RH, Armstrong  LR. The US National Tuberculosis Surveillance System: a descriptive assessment of the completeness and consistency of data reported from 2008 to 2012. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2015;1:e15 DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. National Library of Medicine. MedlinePlus: reportable diseases [cited 2023 March 6] https://medlineplus.gov/ency/article/001929.htm
  6. Engel  A, Roberts  J. Tuberculin skin test reaction among adults 25–74 years, United States, 1971–72. Vital Health Stat 11. 1977;204:140.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bennett  DE, Courval  JM, Onorato  I, Agerton  T, Gibson  JD, Lambert  L, et al. Prevalence of tuberculosis infection in the United States population: the national health and nutrition examination survey, 1999–2000. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;177:34855. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Miramontes  R, Hill  AN, Yelk Woodruff  RS, Lambert  LA, Navin  TR, Castro  KG, et al. Tuberculosis infection in the United States: prevalence estimates from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2011–2012. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0140881. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Akinbami  LJ, Chen  TC, Davy  O, Ogden  CL, Fink  S, Clark  J, et al. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2017–March 2020 prepandemic file: sample design, estimation, and analytic guidelines. Vital Health Stat. 2022;190:1–36.
  10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. NHANES 2019–2020 overview [cited 2023 Feb 6]. https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/continuousnhanes/overview.aspx?BeginYear=2019
  11. Yelk Woodruff  R, Hill  A, Marks  S, Navin  T, Miramontes  R. Estimated latent tuberculosis infection prevalence and tuberculosis reactivation rates among non-US-born residents in the United States, from the 2011–2012 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Immigr Minor Health. 2021;23:80612. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2019–March 2020 convenience sample limited access data. [cited 2023 Apr 25] https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/search/datapage.aspx?Component=LimitedAccess&CycleBeginYear=2019
  13. National Center for Health Statistics Research Data Center. Disclosure manual—preventing disclosure: rules for researchers. 2019 [cited 2023 Feb 6] https://www.cdc.gov/rdc/data/b4/Disclosure-Manual-v2.3.pdf
  14. Sterling  TR, Njie  G, Zenner  D, Cohn  DL, Reves  R, Ahmed  A, et al. Guidelines for the treatment of latent tuberculosis infection: recommendations from the National Tuberculosis Controllers Association and CDC, 2020. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2020;69(No. RR-1):111. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Mangione  CM, Barry  MJ, Nicholson  WK, Cabana  M, Chelmow  D, Coker  TR, et al.; US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for latent tuberculosis infection in adults: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2023;329:148794. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Table

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2907.230324

Original Publication Date: June 12, 2023

Table of Contents – Volume 29, Number 7—July 2023

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Rachel Woodruff, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road NE, Mailstop H24-4, Atlanta, GA 30329-4027, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: May 05, 2023
Page updated: June 28, 2023
Page reviewed: June 28, 2023
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external