Volume 11, Number 6—June 2005
Research
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci in Rural Communities, Western United States
Table 4
No (%) |
|||
---|---|---|---|
Resistant group†, N = 142 | Susceptible group‡, N = 32 | p value§ | |
Skin and soft tissue | 74 (52) | 26 (81) | 0.003 |
Urine | 15 (11) | 0 (0) | NS |
Blood | 9 (6) | 1 (3) | NS |
Sputum | 30 (21) | 1 (3) | 0.019 |
Other source | 14 (10) | 4 (13) | NS |
Community-associated | 38 (27) | 24 (75) | <0.0001 |
Sex | |||
Male | 79 (56) | 17 (53) | – |
Female | 63 (44) | 15 (47) | – |
Mean age (y) | 69 | 32 | 0.0001 |
Age >65 y | 89 (63) | 3 (9) | <0.0001 |
Diabetes mellitus | 38 (27) | 1 (3) | 0.002 |
Renal failure | 13 (9) | 0 (0) | NS |
Prior antimicrobial therapy | 61 (43) | 6 (19) | 0.015 |
Immunosuppression | 14 (10) | 0 (0) | NS |
*MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; NS, not significant.
†MRSA isolates resistant to both clindamycin and ciprofloxacin.
‡MRSA isolates susceptible to both clindamycin and ciprofloxacin.
§Based on Fisher exact test. Comparison of age tested by Kruskal-Wallis equality of populations rank test.
Page created: April 24, 2012
Page updated: April 24, 2012
Page reviewed: April 24, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.