Volume 11, Number 7—July 2005
Research
Emergency Department Response to SARS, Taiwan
Table 5
Response to the SARS outbreak | Difficulty |
Effectiveness |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Median | IQR | Median | IQR | Correlation | p value | |
Basic ICM | ||||||
Entrance body temperature screen | 1 | 1 | 5 | 1 | –0.061 | 0.55 |
Visitors restriction | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | –0.309 | 0.002 |
Quarantine of fever patients outside of EDs | 2 | 3 | 5 | 1 | –0.283 | 0.005 |
Institution of isolation room at ED | 3 | 3 | 4 | 1 | –0.226 | 0.026 |
Institution of fever screening station | 1 | 2 | 5 | 1 | –0.128 | 0.214 |
Additional ICM | ||||||
Institution of fever triage ward | 3 | 2 | 4 | 4 | –0.210 | 0.042 |
Restriction of fever patient admission | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | –0.283 | 0.005 |
SARS screening team | 4 | 2.25 | 4 | 3 | –0.408 | 0.000 |
Restriction of transfer in | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | –0.269 | 0.010 |
Suspected cases transfer out | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | –0.210 | 0.040 |
Closure of ED | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | –0.153 | 0.140 |
*SARS, severe acute respiratory syndrome; IQR, interquartile range; ED, emergency department.
Page created: April 23, 2012
Page updated: April 23, 2012
Page reviewed: April 23, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.