Volume 20, Number 2—February 2014
Dispatch
Molecular Detection of Diphyllobothrium nihonkaiense in Humans, China
Table
Case no. | Residence/place of eating fish, if different | Proglottids expelled | Suspected source of infection | Proglottid specimen fixative | Morphologic identification | Molecular identification | GenBank accession no. for cox1 gene | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1–4 | Heilongjiang | NA | NA | NA | D. latum | NT | NA | (11) |
5 | Beijing | NA | NA | NA | D. latum | NT | NA | (11) |
6 | Shanghai | NA | NA | NA | D. latum | NT | NA | (11) |
7 | Beijing (returned from United States) | NA | NA | NA | D. latum | NT | NA | (11) |
8 | Guangzhou (returned from Argentina) | NA | NA | NA | D. latum | NT | NA | (11) |
9 | Heilongjiang | NA | Raw fish | NA | D. latum | NT | NA | (11) |
10 | Jilin | NA | Raw fish | NA | D. latum | NT | NA | (11) |
11 |
Fujian (lived in Yokohama, Japan, until 1996) |
2003 Jan |
Plecoglossus altivelis |
NA |
D. latum |
NT |
NA |
(12) |
12 | Heilongjiang | 2009 Jan | Raw fish | 10% formalin | D. latum | D. nihonkaiense | AB684625 | (13) and this study |
13 | Heilongjiang | NA | Salmon | NA | D. latum | D. latum | NA | (14) |
14 | Jilin | NA | Salmon | NA | D. latum | D. latum | NA | (14) |
15 | Shanghai, 2008-2011/Japan, China | 2011 Dec | Raw sea and freshwater fish | NA | D. latum | D. latum | NA | (15) |
16 | Shanghai/Japan (returned from Japan in June 2008; ate raw salmon in Shanghai) | 2008 Oct | Raw salmon | 10% formalin | D. latum | D. nihonkaiense | AB684624 | This study |
17 | Shanghai | 2011 Sep | Raw salmon | 70% ethanol | D. latum | D. nihonkaiense | AB684621 | This study |
18 | Shanghai. Ate raw salmon in April 2011 | 2011 Jun | Raw salmon | 70% ethanol | D. latum | D. nihonkaiense | AB684622 | This study |
19 | Shanghai. Ate raw salmon in 2011 | 2011 Jul | Raw salmon | 70% ethanol | D. latum | D. nihonkaiense | AB684623 | This study |
*Identification of Diphyllobothrium spp. was performed by morphologic identification alone in cases 1–11; organisms in each case were identified as D. latum. Cases 12–19 were assessed by morphologic and molecular identification; morphologic identification of all specimens was D. latum. Molecular identification varied from morphologic findings in 5 of 8 tested specimens. NA, not available; NT, not tested.
1These authors contributed equally to this article.
Page created: January 16, 2014
Page updated: January 16, 2014
Page reviewed: January 16, 2014
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.