Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 24, Number 11—November 2018
CME ACTIVITY - Synopsis

Rickettsia typhi as Cause of Fatal Encephalitic Typhus in Hospitalized Patients, Hamburg, Germany, 1940–1944

Author affiliations: Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany

Cite This Article

Introduction

CME Logo

In support of improving patient care, this activity has been planned and implemented by Medscape, LLC and Emerging Infectious Diseases. Medscape, LLC is jointly accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education (ACCME), the Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare team.

Medscape, LLC designates this Journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1.00 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s). Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.

All other clinicians completing this activity will be issued a certificate of participation. To participate in this journal CME activity: (1) review the learning objectives and author disclosures; (2) study the education content; (3) take the post-test with a 75% minimum passing score and complete the evaluation at http://www.medscape.org/journal/eid; and (4) view/print certificate.

Release date: October 15, 2018; Expiration date: October 15, 2019

Learning Objectives

Upon completion of this activity, participants will be able to:

•     Describe molecular and other findings related to pathogens identified in archived 73-year-old tissue blocks from patients diagnosed with typhus during World War II

•     Explain immunohistochemical and histopathological findings in archived 73-year-old tissue blocks from patients diagnosed with typhus during World War II

•     Determine clinical and public health implications of findings from archived 73-year-old tissue blocks from patients diagnosed with typhus clinically and histopathologically during World War II

CME Editor

Kristina B. Clark, PhD, Copyeditor, Emerging Infectious Diseases. Disclosure: Kristina B. Clark, PhD, has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

CME Author

Laurie Barclay, MD, freelance writer and reviewer, Medscape, LLC. Disclosure: Laurie Barclay, MD, has disclosed the following relevant financial relationships: owns stock, stock options, or bonds from Pfizer.

Authors

Disclosures: Jessica Rauch, PhD; Birgit Muntau, MSc; Petra Eggert; and Dennis Tappe, MD, have disclosed no relevant financial relationships.

Top

Abstract

We evaluated formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue specimens from 7 patients who died with encephalitic typhus in Hamburg, Germany, during World War II. The archived specimens included only central nervous system tissues >70 years old that had been stored at room temperature. We demonstrated successful detection of Rickettsia typhi DNA by a nested qPCR specific to prsA in 2 patients. These results indicate that R. typhi infections contributed to typhus outbreaks during World War II. Immunohistochemical analyses of brain tissue specimens of R. typhi DNA–positive and –negative specimens showed perivascular B-cell accumulation. Around blood vessels, nodular cell accumulations consisted of CD4-positive and CD8-positive T cells and CD68-positive microglia and macrophages; neutrophils were found rarely. These findings are similar to those of previously reported R. prowazekii tissue specimen testing. Because R. typhi and R. prowazekii infections can be clinically and histopathologically similar, molecular analyses should be performed to distinguish the 2 pathogens.

Rickettsia typhi infection, also known as murine or endemic typhus, is, except for its often milder course, clinically indistinguishable from epidemic typhus caused by R. prowazekii. Infection with R. typhi or R. prowazekii causes a clinical syndrome of high fever, headache, and rash. The central nervous system (CNS), cardiac, and pulmonary complications that occur are responsible for fatality rates of 4% for untreated endemic typhus and 30% for epidemic typhus (13). Whereas R. typhi is transmitted by fleas (oriental rat flea Xenopsylla cheopis and cat flea Ctenocephalides felis), R. prowazekii is transmitted by the human body louse Pediculus humanus corporis. Both of these pathogens are obligate intracellular zoonotic bacteria and Biosafety Level 3 pathogens (13); R. prowazekii is classified as a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention category B bioweapon agent.

Human infection with these bacteria occurs after inoculation of flea or louse feces in the skin lesion caused by the arthropod bite or by inhalation of dust containing dried vector feces. The appearance of epidemic louseborne typhus is often attributed to overcrowding and unhygienic conditions, such as those seen in prisons and refugee, labor, and concentration camps, and is associated with poverty and war worldwide. In contrast, the occurrence of murine fleaborne typhus is sporadic and linked to the presence of rats, often in coastal subtropical regions. Large epidemics of louseborne typhus occurred during World War I and II, leading to high fatalities in civilian populations, forced laborers, imprisoned persons, and military personnel.

We examined brain tissue samples from persons who had died from typhus in an infectious disease hospital in Hamburg, Germany, during World War II. We characterized R. typhi and R. prowazekii infections by using histologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular techniques.

Materials and Methods

Typhus Cases

We identified typhus cases by screening the books of arrivals from the Bernhard Nocht Institute Department of Pathology (Hamburg) for clinical and histopathologic descriptions of typhus. The Bernhard Nocht Institute Department of Pathology served as a center for infectious disease pathology diagnosis and received typhus specimens from multiple hospitals in Hamburg. We retrieved from the archives formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue blocks, which had been stored at room temperature. Clearance by the local ethics committee was obtained (no. WF-034/17) for our analyses.

Histology and Immunohistochemical Analyses

For each FFPE tissue block, we analyzed a standard hematoxylin and eosin stained section microscopically for typhus nodules and documented the presence and numbers of lesions semiquantitatively. We screened sections for intracellular rickettsiae using Giemsa stains.

We performed immunohistochemical studies with antibodies against CD3 (1:400 dilution; EpitMics, Burlingame, CA, USA), CD20 (1:150 dilution; Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA), CD4 (1:30 dilution; Cell Marque, Rocklin, CA, USA), CD8 (1:20 dilution; Cell Marque), CD68 (1:100 dilution; Agilent), CD177 (1:33 dilution; Zytomed, Berlin, Germany), and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS, 1:100 dilution; Zytomed). After pretreatment of FFPE tissue sections with buffers containing Trilogy (medac diagnostika, Tornesch, Germany; at 95°C for CD177), EDTA (pH 8 for CD4), or citrate (pH 6 for CD3, CD20, CD8, CD68, and iNOS) and endogenous peroxidase blocking, we incubated the sections with the respective antibodies in Antibody Diluent Solution (Zytomed) at 4°C overnight. Then, we incubated with either AEC 2-Component Detection Kit and 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole substrate (DCS, Hamburg, Germany) for immunoperoxidase staining or AP Detection Kit and Fast Blue substrate (DCS) for immunophosphatase staining. Brain tissue from 5 patients without encephalitis served as negative controls, and lymphatic tissue served as a positive control for immunologic staining of immune cells.

Molecular Assays

We ran samples through 3 rounds of processing: FFPE tissue block sectioning, DNA extraction, and quantitative PCR (qPCR). For each round, FFPE tissue blocks from typhus patients and negative control patients (patients with unrelated conditions, e.g., liver amebiasis) were placed in alternating order (i.e., 2 typhus patient samples, 1 negative control, 2 typhus patient samples, 1 negative control, and so on), cut into 5-µm slices, and deparaffinized. Before and after each round of sectioning and between sectioning different samples, we cleaned the microtome and microtome blades with DNA-ExitusPlus (AppliChem, Darmstadt, Germany). We performed DNA extractions with tissue sections in the same order as previously mentioned using the QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). We included 2 additional negative controls (water) per round of extraction.

We performed panrickettsial real-time qPCRs targeting the ompB and gltA genes (4,5). In addition, we used a typhus group rickettsiae–specific qPCR targeting the rpr331 gene (6) and nested species-specific qPCRs detecting the prsA genes (7,8) of the R. typhi and R. prowazekii genomes (Technical Appendix Table). We ran a β-actin gene qPCR (9) in parallel to check DNA quality.

Tissue sectioning, DNA extraction, and qPCR were performed in different levels of the building and by different personnel. No positive control was used in the qPCR.

Results

Seven patients (1 in 1940 and 6 in 1944) had a clinical diagnosis of typhus and a histopathologic diagnosis of typhus on the basis of FFPE tissue blocks. All samples were of CNS tissues (cerebral cortex, pons, medulla oblongata, and cerebellum); 1–3 different CNS regions were available per patient (Table). All but the case from 1940 (patient 6) originated from Langenhorn hospital in the northern part of Hamburg.

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Hematoxylin and eosin staining of typical typhus nodules in brain of typhus patients during World War II, Hamburg, Germany, 1940–1944. Most nodules were found in the pons and medulla oblongata. A) Loose nodule. B) Spongy nodule amid large neuronal cells. C) Compact typhus nodule along longitudinal blood vessel. Note hyperemia of other blood vessels nearby. D) Another compact nodule with hyperemic blood vessels nearby. Original magnifications ×40.

Figure 1. Hematoxylin and eosin staining of typical typhus nodules in brain of typhus patients during World War II, Hamburg, Germany, 1940–1944. Most nodules were found in the pons and medulla oblongata. A)...

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Immunohistochemical analyses of nodule cell compositions from typhus patients during World War II, Hamburg, Germany, 1940–1944. Tissue sections were incubated with specific antibodies and visualized with immunoperoxidase (brown) or immunophosphatase (blue) stains and lightly counterstained with hematoxylin. A) CD3 stain (brown) for T cells and CD20 stain (blue) for B cells. Only T cells are visible within the nodule. Original magnification ×40. B, C) CD4 stain (brown) and CD8 stain

Figure 2. Immunohistochemical analyses of nodule cell compositions from typhus patients during World War II, Hamburg, Germany, 1940–1944. Tissue sections were incubated with specific antibodies and visualized with immunoperoxidase (brown) or immunophosphatase (blue)...

Typical typhus nodules (Figure 1) were found in all cases. Lesions varied in size and location; most were seen in the pons or medulla oblongata (Table). No intracellular rickettsiae were found in Giemsa-stained sections. Immunohistochemical stains with CD20 antibody indicated B cells were only rarely present in perivascular regions and were not found in nodules. In contrast, T cells (CD3-positive cells) contributed prominently to nodule cell composition, consisting of ≈60% CD8+ T cells and ≈40% CD4+ T cells (Figure 2, panels A–C). CD177+ neutrophils were found in nodules rarely, and when present, these neutrophils were scattered mostly throughout the brain parenchyma (D. Tappe, unpub. data). In contrast, a strong signal was seen for CD68+ microglia and macrophages in and around the nodules (Figure 2, panel D). No iNOS+ cells were found (D. Tappe, unpub. data).

The panrickettsial qPCR, typhus group rickettsiae–specific rpr331 qPCR, and R. prowazekii–specific nested qPCR results indicated all samples were negative for rickettsial genomic material. However, the nested prsA qPCR indicated tissue sections of the pons of 2 patients (patient 3 and patient 5; Table) were positive for R. typhi DNA. Positive qPCR results were obtained again with the pons of these patients when the extractions and qPCRs were repeated. All negative controls (FFPE blocks from patients with unrelated conditions and water) were negative. We sequenced the 2 amplicons (201 bp in length, including sequences of the outer primers; patient 3 GenBank accession no. MH553441), and BLAST analyses (http://www.blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) showed sequence identity with R. typhi strains B9991CWPP (GenBank accession no. CP003398), TH1527 (GenBank accession no. CP003397), and Wilmington (GenBank accession no. AE017197) (Technical Appendix Figure).

Discussion

Cases of typhus resulting from war, population displacement, poverty, and overcrowding are usually attributed to epidemic louseborne R. prowazekii (1). We show successful amplification of R. typhi DNA for 2 out of 7 patients with fatal typhus and encephalitis during World War II by a specific nested qPCR with FFPE CNS tissue samples stored for >70 years. Because of this finding, the diagnosis of murine typhus was made retrospectively for these 2 patients. For the remaining 5 patients, no rickettsial DNA could be amplified in the limited tissue materials available, possibly because of poor DNA quality. Nested PCRs are more sensitive than conventional PCRs, which could explain why the panrickettsial qPCRs and typhus group–specific qPCRs did not amply genomic DNA, whereas the nested PCR did with samples from 2 patients. Because nested PCRs are prone to contamination, we took several precautions: we included several negative controls (which remained negative throughout the study), omitted the positive control, and ran the nested PCR as a qPCR.

No intracellular bacteria were found by conventional light microscopy in Giemsa-stained brain sections. We could only assess CNS tissues because other tissue types had not been archived; the reason for the absence of these tissues is unclear. Microscopy results negative for rickettsial bacteria in brain tissue sections of typhus patients are in line with old reports; the doubtless detection of rickettsiae on microscopic examination of epidemic typhus patient samples was notoriously difficult (10,11). We did not attempt immunofluorescence testing of tissue sections. The postmortem detection of tissue nodules in brain sections during microscopic examination has been regarded as specific for epidemic typhus. Such typhus nodules were first described in the skin of patients with rash during epidemic typhus (typhus exanthematicus) in 1913. Shortly thereafter, during World War I, these nodules were found postmortem in the brains of epidemic typhus patients. The nodules were shown to be most prominent in the medulla and pons, also as seen in our study, followed by the basal ganglia, cortex, hippocampus, and cerebellum (1113). In the 1910s, typhus was correctly described as a discontinuous vasculitis that could also occur in the brain involving lesions that form in endothelial cells of the intima of capillaries and small arteries. Inflammatory nodules always arranged around a blood vessel and were composed of lymphocytes, plasma cells, neutrophil granulocytes, and glia cells (12,13). In contrast with autopsy data of epidemic typhus, only rare reports of histopathologic findings of murine typhus exist. Typical rickettsial vascular injury and perivasculitis with lymphocytes, monocytes, and macrophages had been described in the CNS of murine typhus cases (14,15). In our study, immunohistochemistry confirmed the histopathologic findings of all these old reports. We also differentiated the T-cell subsets, showing that most T cells are CD8 positive. Using histopathology and immunohistochemistry, we found no obvious cell composition differences between nodules positive and those negative for R. typhi DNA. Thus, a similar histologic architecture and composition of typhus nodules in murine and epidemic typhus can be assumed.

The 7 cases examined in our study represent a minor fraction of the typhus cases seen in Langenhorn Hospital. The hospital had opened a ward specifically for typhus patients in May 1942, and 320 cases were seen during the following 2 years (16). Forced laborers from Russia who had typhus had also been admitted to this hospital (17).

Murine typhus is often a mild illness but can become more severe in refugee camps (18), and fatal and severe CNS cases of murine typhus have been described (14,19,20). Murine and epidemic typhus can be discerned neither histopathologically nor clinically (except perhaps by their expected respective severities and associated mortality rates, the presence of vectors, or flea or louse bite reactions on the skin). Eschars are usually absent in both forms of typhus. Serologic discrimination of the 2 species by cross-absorption and Western blotting (21) and molecular differentiation are confined to reference laboratories and only became available half a century after the cases were investigated.

The natural reservoir for R. typhi is rats, and unhygienic conditions that occur during times of civil disturbance promote the expansion of rat populations and their fleas and, thus, also the likelihood of persons acquiring murine typhus. Fleas remain infected for life, and their lifespan and feeding behavior are not altered by R. typhi infection (22). However, the R. typhi bacterium has also been shown experimentally to replicate in the body louse (22). Similar to infection with R. prowazekii, lice infected with R. typhi become red due to the rupture of their epithelial gut linings caused by the multiplication of rickettsiae, which reduces their lifespan. Thus, we speculate that R. typhi might also be transmitted by body lice under conditions of civil disturbance previously shown to favor the spread of R. prowazekii.

In conclusion, we show evidence that R. typhi played a role during local outbreaks or epidemics of typhus that were classically attributed to R. prowazekii. Therefore, more cases of typhus should be investigated molecularly to determine the type of rickettsial pathogen involved. Whether R. typhi was transmitted during World War II by lice remains to be elucidated.

Dr. Rauch is a biochemist at the National Reference Center for Tropical Diseases, Bernhard Nocht Institute, Hamburg, Germany. Her research interests focus on diagnostic methods and the immune response to rickettsial diseases.

Top

References

  1. Bechah  Y, Capo  C, Mege  JL, Raoult  D. Epidemic typhus. Lancet Infect Dis. 2008;8:41726. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Civen  R, Ngo  V. Murine typhus: an unrecognized suburban vectorborne disease. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:9138. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Tsioutis  C, Zafeiri  M, Avramopoulos  A, Prousali  E, Miligkos  M, Karageorgos  SA. Clinical and laboratory characteristics, epidemiology, and outcomes of murine typhus: A systematic review. Acta Trop. 2017;166:1624. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Keller  C, Krüger  A, Schwarz  NG, Rakotozandrindrainy  R, Rakotondrainiarivelo  JP, Razafindrabe  T, et al. High detection rate of Rickettsia africae in Amblyomma variegatum but low prevalence of anti-rickettsial antibodies in healthy pregnant women in Madagascar. Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2016;7:605. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Mourembou  G, Lekana-Douki  JB, Mediannikov  O, Nzondo  SM, Kouna  LC, Essone  JC, et al. Possible role of Rickettsia felis in acute febrile illness among children in Gabon. Emerg Infect Dis. 2015;21:180815. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Leulmi  H, Socolovschi  C, Laudisoit  A, Houemenou  G, Davoust  B, Bitam  I, et al. Detection of Rickettsia felis, Rickettsia typhi, Bartonella species, and Yersinia pestis in fleas (Siphonaptera) from Africa. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8:e3152. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Papp  S, Rauch  J, Kuehl  S, Richardt  U, Keller  C, Osterloh  A. Comparative evaluation of two Rickettsia typhi-specific quantitative real-time PCRs for research and diagnostic purposes. Med Microbiol Immunol (Berl). 2017;206:4151. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Rauch  J, Eisermann  P, Noack  B, Mehlhoop  U, Muntau  B, Schäfer  J, et al. Typhus group rickettsiosis, Germany, 2010–2017. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24:121320. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Socolovschi  C, Mediannikov  O, Sokhna  C, Tall  A, Diatta  G, Bassene  H, et al. Rickettsia felis-associated uneruptive fever, Senegal. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:11402. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. da Rocha-Lima  H. Zum nachweis der Rickettsia prowazeki bei fleckfieberkranken. Munch Med Wochenschr. 1917;1:335.
  11. Wolbach  SB, Todd  JL, Palfrey  FW. The etiology and pathology of typhus. Being the main report of the Typhus Research Commission of the League of Red Cross Societies to Poland. Cambridge (MA, USA): The League of Red Cross Societies at the Harvard University Press; 1922.
  12. Ceelen  W. Histologische befunde bei fleckfieber. Klin Wochenschr (Berlin). 1916;21:5302.
  13. Spielmeyer  W. Die zentralen veränderungen beim fleckfieber und ihre bedeutung für die histopathologie der hirnrinde. Z Gesamte Neurol Psychiatr. 1919;47:154. DOIGoogle Scholar
  14. Walker  DH, Parks  FM, Betz  TG, Taylor  JP, Muehlberger  JW. Histopathology and immunohistologic demonstration of the distribution of Rickettsia typhi in fatal murine typhus. Am J Clin Pathol. 1989;91:7204. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Binford  CH, Ecker  HD. Endemic (murine) typhus; report of autopsy findings in three cases. Am J Clin Pathol. 1947;17:797806. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Mannweiler  E. Geschichte des Instituts für Schiffs-und Tropenkrankheiten in Hamburg, 1900–1945. In: Kraus O, editor. Abhandlungen des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins in Hamburg. Keltern-Weiler (Germany): Goecke & Evers; 1998.
  17. Wulf  S. Das Hamburger Tropeninstitut 1919 bis 1945. 1st ed. Berlin: Dietrich Reimer Verlag; 1994.
  18. Cowan  G. Rickettsial diseases: the typhus group of fevers—a review. Postgrad Med J. 2000;76:26972. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Pether  JV, Jones  W, Lloyd  G, Rutter  DA, Barry  M. Fatal murine typhus from Spain. Lancet. 1994;344:8978. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Xu  Z, Zhu  X, Lu  Q, Li  X, Hu  Y. Misdiagnosed murine typhus in a patient with multiple cerebral infarctions and hemorrhage: a case report. BMC Neurol. 2015;15:121. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. La Scola  B, Rydkina  L, Ndihokubwayo  JB, Vene  S, Raoult  D. Serological differentiation of murine typhus and epidemic typhus using cross-adsorption and Western blotting. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2000;7:6126.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Houhamdi  L, Fournier  PE, Fang  R, Raoult  D. An experimental model of human body louse infection with Rickettsia typhi. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003;990:61727. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures
Table

Top

Follow Up

Earning CME Credit

To obtain credit, you should first read the journal article. After reading the article, you should be able to answer the following, related, multiple-choice questions. To complete the questions (with a minimum 75% passing score) and earn continuing medical education (CME) credit, please go to http://www.medscape.org/journal/eid. Credit cannot be obtained for tests completed on paper, although you may use the worksheet below to keep a record of your answers.

You must be a registered user on http://www.medscape.org. If you are not registered on http://www.medscape.org, please click on the “Register” link on the right hand side of the website.

Only one answer is correct for each question. Once you successfully answer all post-test questions, you will be able to view and/or print your certificate. For questions regarding this activity, contact the accredited provider, CME@medscape.net. For technical assistance, contact CME@medscape.net. American Medical Association’s Physician’s Recognition Award (AMA PRA) credits are accepted in the US as evidence of participation in CME activities. For further information on this award, please go to https://www.ama-assn.org. The AMA has determined that physicians not licensed in the US who participate in this CME activity are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Through agreements that the AMA has made with agencies in some countries, AMA PRA credit may be acceptable as evidence of participation in CME activities. If you are not licensed in the US, please complete the questions online, print the AMA PRA CME credit certificate, and present it to your national medical association for review.

Article Title:
Rickettsia typhi as Cause of Fatal Encephalitic Typhus in Hospitalized Patients, Hamburg, Germany, 1940–1944

CME Questions

1.   You are advising a medical facility for a refugee camp regarding a potential typhus outbreak. According to the histopathological study by Rauch and colleagues, which of the following statements about molecular and other findings related to pathogens identified in archived 73-year-old tissue blocks from 7 patients diagnosed with typhus during World War II is correct?

A. Conventional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing identified Rickettsia prowazekii in 2 samples

B. Using a specific nested quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) allowed successful amplification of Rickettsia typhi DNA in 2 samples

C. Conventional light microscopy identified Rickettsia in 3 Giemsa-stained brain sections

D. The study proved louse-borne epidemic R. prowazekii was responsible for all 7 typhus cases

2.   According to the study by Rauch and colleagues, which of the following statements about immunohistochemical and histopathological findings in archived 73-year-old tissue blocks from patients diagnosed with typhus during the World War II is correct?

A. Brain lesions in R. typhi–positive but not in R. typhi–negative brain tissue showed perivascular B cell accumulation

B. Nodular cell accumulations of cluster of differentiation (CD)4+ and CD8+ T cells, CD68+ microglia and macrophages, and rarely neutrophils occurred around blood vessels

C. Typhus nodules were most prominent in the cerebellum

D. Histopathology and immunohistochemistry were significantly different in nodules positive for R. typhi and those negative for R. typhi

3.   According to the histopathological study by Rauch and colleagues, which of the following statements about clinical and public health implications of findings from archived 73-year-old tissue blocks from patients diagnosed with typhus during World War II is correct?

A. These fatal typhus cases were exclusively louse-borne

B. Cases of typhus during times of war, displacement of people, poverty, and overcrowding are usually attributed to flea-borne endemic R. typhi

C. More cases of typhus should undergo molecular testing for the presence of either rickettsial pathogen

D.        R. prowazekii uses rats as natural reservoirs

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2411.171373

Original Publication Date: October 15, 2018

Related Links

Table of Contents – Volume 24, Number 11—November 2018

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Dennis Tappe, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Bernhard-Nocht-Str 74, 20359 Hamburg, Germany

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: October 15, 2018
Page updated: October 15, 2018
Page reviewed: October 15, 2018
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external