Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link

Volume 31, Number 6—June 2025

Research Letter

Usutu Virus Antibody Dynamics in Naturally Infected Blackbirds, the Netherlands, 2016–2018

Figures
Tables
Article Metrics
Author affiliation: ErasmusMC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (E. de Bruin, F. Chandler, R. Kohl, A. van der Linden, M. Koopmans, C. Reusken); Nederlands Instituut voor Ecologie, Dutch Centre for Avian Migration and Demography, Wageningen, the Netherlands (J. van Irsel, T. van de Voorde, H. van der Jeugd); Wildlife Ecology and Conservation Group, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen (W.F. de Boer)

Cite This Article

Abstract

Usutu virus is a zoonotic arbovirus that causes massive mortality in blackbirds. Using a unique longitudinal dataset on the kinetics of virus-specific antibodies in naturally infected wild blackbirds (Turdus merula), we found that individual birds may remain seropositive for >1 year and that reinfection can occur despite low-level virus neutralizing antibodies.

Usutu virus (USUV), a mosquitoborne zoonotic virus of the genus Orthoflavivirus, was first detected in the Netherlands in 2016 (1). Eurasian blackbirds (Turdus merula) are remarkably susceptible to USUV disease; exceptional die-off among blackbirds is a hallmark of the (re)-emergence of virus circulation in a region (2,3). Information on survival of blackbirds after USUV infection and the resulting prevalence of USUV antibodies in such populations is limited, and knowledge of the longitudinal dynamics in USUV antibody responses in individual naturally infected blackbirds is lacking. We studied the presence of USUV-specific antibodies in blackbirds during the first 3 years after the initial detection of the virus in the Netherlands.

During March 2016–October 2018, as part of a broader study of zoonoses in songbirds in the Netherlands, we registered 1,181 blackbird captures; 969 unique birds were captured 1–9 times (1,4). Sampling locations were biased; of 77 sampling locations, just 4 contributed nearly 50% of all samples (Overdinkel, 52°14′N, 7°01′E; Wageningen, 51°59′N, 5°39′E; Haarzuilens, 52°08′N, 5°00′E; Eastermar, 53°11′N, 6°03′E).

We sampled healthy birds by wing vein puncture. Overall, a total of 667 serum samples from 534 unique blackbirds were tested. The samples were screened in a 2-tier system of protein microarray testing including the nonstructural 1 proteins of USUV and West Nile virus (WNV), followed by confirmation of positive IgG results based on comparative USUV and WNV neutralization (5). USUV and WNV belong to the same serogroup, causing probable cross-reactivity in serologic assays (6). Therefore, we only considered serum samples confirmed for antibodies when microarray reactivity was confirmed by comparative virus neutralization test (VNT) results showing USUV antibody titers >4-fold higher than a WNV antibody titer, or vice versa. Serum samples with a positive USUV microarray result but no conclusive confirmation by VNT were considered orthoflavivirus positive (Table). To determine the USUV seroprevalence by calendar year, we only included birds that were repeatedly sampled within the same year once, and in cases of seroconversion within a year (n = 4), we only included the positive outcome.

According to the stated criteria for confirmed infection, 3 (4.8%) of 63 unique birds were positive for USUV-specific antibodies in 2016; in 2017, the total was 21 (7.5%) of 280; and in 2018, the total was 26 (10.0%) of 237 (Table). Results showed a significant increase in seroprevalence over those years [χ2(1) = 6.01, p = 0.01; Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit χ2(8) = 3.24, p = 0.92], with a peak in autumn 2017 (data not shown) (7). That increase is in line with observations in Austria, where seropositivity of 9.1% in blackbirds was found 2 years after the virus was first detected, and 9.6% 3 years after (8). However, in Germany, seropositivity remained low (<3.9%) in the 5 years after a massive blackbird die-off (9).

Figure

Longitudinal results for Usutu virus (USUV) serologic testing of serum samples from naturally study of USUV antibody dynamics in naturally infected blackbirds, the Netherlands, 2016–2018. Birds were recaptured and sampled >1 time. A) USUV seropositivity status for recaptured blackbirds that were sampled 2–9 times (n = 84). Left axis indicates individual blackbird identification numbers (1–84); dots represent moment of actual sampling; lines connecting sampling moments of each individual bird are supportive to figure interpretation and have no meaning. Black dots indicate seronegative by microarray; red dots, confirmed positive for USUV antibodies by microarray and comparative VNT USUV versus West Nile virus; green dots, confirmed positive for orthoflavivirus antibodies. B) Trends in USUV virus neutralization test titers in time for recaptured blackbirds that were seropositive >1 time (n = 11). Reciprocal antibody titers are shown. Red lines indicate birds that showed an increase in titer after an initial decline; black lines indicate birds that showed no kinetics or a decline in titer over time. VNT, virus neutralization test.

Figure. Longitudinal results for Usutu virus (USUV) serologic testing of serum samples from naturally study of USUV antibody dynamics in naturally infected blackbirds, the Netherlands, 2016–2018. Birds were recaptured and sampled...

Starting in September 2016, the Netherlands study captured 124 blackbirds >1 time (range 2–9 times); 84 birds had serum samples taken at >1 capture. Of those birds, 17 were confirmed seropositive >1 time; 7 seroconverted during the study period, and 10 were positive at all time points (Figure, panel A). Of the remaining 67 recaptured birds, 66 remained seronegative throughout the study, whereas 1 bird seroconverted for USUV, based on microarray and USUV VNT only. No seroreversion was observed.

The longest period of seropositivity recorded was >361 days. That bird was already seropositive at first sampling and was not followed beyond 361 days. To gain insight into functional neutralizing antibody kinetics, we plotted over time the VNT titers of the 12 birds that were positive at multiple sampling points (Figure, panel B). Six birds showed waning neutralizing antibody titers in time with variable kinetics. Two birds showed no changes in titers in samples taken 33 and 42 days apart, whereas 2 other birds showed an increase in titers taken 5 and 21 days apart. Two birds showed an initial decline in VNT titers, then an increase within 41 and 113 days; corresponding cloaca swab specimens showed a similar trend (positive-negative-positive) for the presence of USUV RNA (no sequence information available). That finding might be indicative for the occurrence of reinfection in the presence of low USUV-neutralizing antibodies, whether or not by different USUV lineages; Africa-3 is the most common infecting lineage in the Netherlands, followed by Europe-3 lineage (4). Alternatively, such observations might be the result of exacerbation of a persistent infection (10). Conclusive evidence is needed from additional longitudinal studies, including experimental infections. Further insight into the longevity of USUV-specific antibodies in different bird species, the occurrence of reinfections, and the relationship between variations in the immune-status of a specific bird population and variations in the level of virus circulation will contribute to a better understanding of the added value of the assessment of public health risks based on seroecologic surveillance.

In conclusion, our study provides a unique longitudinal dataset on the kinetics of USUV-specific antibodies in naturally infected wild blackbirds. We show seropositivity in individual blackbirds for >1 year and the possible occurrence of reinfection in the presence of low-level virus neutralizing antibodies.

Top

Acknowledgments

Blackbird captures were performed under ethical permit no. AVD801002015342 to the Netherlands Institute of Ecology.

This project was executed as part of Eco-Alert and funded by ZonMw grant no. 50-52200-98-026.

Top

References

  1. Rijks  JM, Kik  ML, Slaterus  R, Foppen  R, Stroo  A, IJzer  J, et al. Widespread Usutu virus outbreak in birds in the Netherlands, 2016. Euro Surveill. 2016;21:21. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Gaibani  P, Rossini  G. An overview of Usutu virus. Microbes Infect. 2017;19:3827. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Weissenböck  H, Kolodziejek  J, Url  A, Lussy  H, Rebel-Bauder  B, Nowotny  N. Emergence of Usutu virus, an African mosquito-borne flavivirus of the Japanese encephalitis virus group, central Europe. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:6526. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Oude Munnink  BB, Münger  E, Nieuwenhuijse  DF, Kohl  R, van der Linden  A, Schapendonk  CME, et al. Genomic monitoring to understand the emergence and spread of Usutu virus in the Netherlands, 2016-2018. Sci Rep. 2020;10:2798. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cleton  NB, Godeke  GJ, Reimerink  J, Beersma  MF, Doorn  HR, Franco  L, et al. Spot the difference-development of a syndrome based protein microarray for specific serological detection of multiple flavivirus infections in travelers. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015;9:e0003580. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kasbergen  LMR, Nieuwenhuijse  DF, de Bruin  E, Sikkema  RS, Koopmans  MPG. The increasing complexity of arbovirus serology: An in-depth systematic review on cross-reactivity. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2023;17:e0011651. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hosmer  DW, Hjort  NL. Goodness-of-fit processes for logistic regression: simulation results. Stat Med. 2002;21:272338. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Meister  T, Lussy  H, Bakonyi  T, Sikutová  S, Rudolf  I, Vogl  W, et al. Serological evidence of continuing high Usutu virus (Flaviviridae) activity and establishment of herd immunity in wild birds in Austria. Vet Microbiol. 2008;127:23748. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Michel  F, Fischer  D, Eiden  M, Fast  C, Reuschel  M, Müller  K, et al. West Nile virus and Usutu virus monitoring of wild birds in Germany. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15:171. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Streng  K, Atama  N, Chandler  F, Blom  R, van der Jeugd  H, Schrama  M, et al. Sentinel chicken surveillance reveals previously undetected circulation of West Nile virus in the Netherlands. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2024;13:2406278. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figure
Table

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid3106.241744

Original Publication Date: May 14, 2025

1Current affiliation: Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

2Current affiliation: Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.

3These authors contributed equally to this article.

Table of Contents – Volume 31, Number 6—June 2025

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Chantal Reusken, Centre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, PO Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, the Netherlands

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: May 08, 2025
Page updated: May 28, 2025
Page reviewed: May 28, 2025
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external