Volume 32, Number 1—January 2026
Dispatch
Genomic Analysis of Sin Nombre Virus Sequences, Northwestern United States, 2023
Suggested citation for this article
Abstract
We report Sin Nombre virus (SNV) genome sequences in the northwestern United States, including SNV sequences recovered from montane voles. Analysis of samples collected from 189 individual rodents revealed high SNV prevalence in the region and evidence of virus reassortment or coinfection, highlighting ongoing virus diversification in rodents.
Sin Nombre virus (SNV; Orthohantavirus sinnombreense), is a member of the family Hantaviridae and the primary cause of hantavirus pulmonary syndrome in North America. First identified during a 1993 outbreak in the Four Corners region of the United States, SNV is linked to severe respiratory disease and high mortality rates (1). During 1993–2022, a total of 864 hantavirus pulmonary syndrome cases were reported in the United States, with a 36% case-fatality rate (2,3); 109 of those cases occurred in the northwestern states of Idaho, Oregon, and Washington.
SNV primarily is maintained by Peromyscus spp. deer mice, widespread rodents that are frequently associated with agricultural and peridomestic settings. Human infection usually results from inhalation of aerosolized virus particles from contaminated excreta (4,5), and zoonotic risk is influenced by ecologic factors (6). Although SNV commonly is detected in deer mice, several reported detections in sympatric rodent species, and broad geographic distributions suggest greater complexity in hantavirus maintenance (7–9).
Virus genomic surveillance can provide insights on virus evolution and spread (10), but <100 full SNV genomes have been published, none of which are from the northwestern United States (3). We report detection and genome sequences of SNV in the northwestern United States in montane voles and western deer mice.
During June–August 2023, we live-trapped rodents at farms and natural areas in the Palouse region of eastern Washington and western Idaho (Figure 1), a major agricultural hub dominated by wheat and canola fields. We conducted sampling over 3 consecutive nights, including repeated fecal sampling with mark-recapture and lethal collection on the third night. We collected and tested samples from 189 rodents across agricultural and natural landscapes in the Palouse. We identified species using morphologic criteria in consultation with regional experts. We deployed Sherman live traps at 8 farms and 2 forested sites in 2 grids (100 m × 30 m) at each location. All procedures followed American Veterinary Medical Association guidelines and were approved by the Washington State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Animal Study Approval Form no. 6927). We performed sampling under Idaho scientific collections permits 36112 and JOE1 and Washington state scientific collections permit SEIFERT 23–122.
We collected fecal samples on all trapping nights, in addition to serum, lung tissue, and bladder tissue on the third and final trapping night at each site. We report only data from the final capture for each individual rodent sampled. Across all sites, we collected samples from 2 creeping voles (Microtus oregoni), 18 montane voles (Microtus montanus), 4 western meadow voles (Microtus drummondii), 2 house mice (Mus musculus), 153 western deer mice (Peromyscus sonoriensis), 1 yellow pine chipmunk (Neotamias amoenus), and 9 least chipmunks (Neotamias minimus).
We used SNV nucleocapsid protein (BEI Resources, https://www.beiresources.org) to assess seroreactivity in rodent serum samples. We immobilized the nucleocapsid protein on Maxisorp-plates (Thermo Fisher Scientific, https://www.thermofisher.com) and applied serum diluted 1:100. We detected nucleocapsid protein bound antibodies with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rat secondary antibody (AbCAM, https://www.abcam.com). We assessed seropositivity for each plate as the mean optical density of 4 naive serum controls +3 SD.
We extracted total RNA from tissue samples and fecal samples by using the Zymo Quick-RNA MagBead kit (Zymo Research, https://www.zymoresearch.com), according to the manufacturer’s protocol for each sample type. We detected presence of virus RNA by using quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR), as previously described (11), with an internal control targeting the P. maniculatus hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyltransferase gene to monitor extraction and amplification performance with in-house–designed forward primer (5′-CAAAGCCTAAGAGGAGAGTTCA-3′), reverse primer (5′-GATGGCCGCAGAACTAGAA-3′), and probe (5HEX/AGGAGTCCC/ZEN/ATTGATGTTGCCAGT/3IABkFQ).
Western deer mice demonstrated high prevalence by serologic testing (26%) and qRT-PCR (9.8%) across all sites (Table). Among qRT-PCR–positive western deer mice, lung cycle threshold (Ct) values ranged from 18.1 to 34.1 (mean 25.3). Two adult male western deer mice had qRT-PCR–positive bladder samples with Ct values of 31.9 and 33.6; both rodents had low lung Ct values (18.1 and 21.5). Montane voles on farmlands showed the highest prevalence, having 50% seroprevalence and 22.2% qRT-PCR–positive lung tissue samples (Table) and Ct values of 29.5 and 26.5, which were within the range observed in western deer mice. We note recent findings in New Mexico showing similarly high prevalence for SNV in diverse rodent taxa, including recovery of infectious virus (9). Fewer lung samples were qRT-PCR–positive than seropositive rodents. We deposited surveillance data for this study in the Pathogen Harmonized Surveillance database (https://pharos.viralemergence.org/projects/?prj = prjdGTXI9IIBo).
We modeled SNV lung positivity detected by qRT-PCR as a binary outcome by using logistic regression with mean bias reduction in the R 4.1.3 brglm2 package (The R Project for Statistical Computing, https://www.r-project.org) for species with qRT-PCR–positive lung tissue samples. Predictors were land type (forest or farm), sex, age, and species (M. montanus montane voles or P. sonoriensis western deer mice). Male rodents had significantly higher odds of qRT-PCR positivity in lung tissue samples than did female rodents (odds ratio 9.42 [95% CI 1.76–50.5]), whereas land type, species, and age were not significant predictors. Elevated SNV prevalence in male deer mice aligns with known SNV ecology, although the precise mechanism is unknown (12).
We sequenced SNV by using a tiled amplicon scheme proposed by Goodfellow et al. (13) on the Oxford Nanopore platform (https://nanoporetech.com). We quality controlled reads, trimmed primers, mapped reads, and extracted the consensus sequence by using an in-house assembly pipeline (https://github.com/viralemergence/SNVler). We recovered sequence data for all 3 SNV genome segments from 10 individual rodents, including 2 montane voles; segment completeness ranged from 24% to 100% and depth ranged from 6.8 to 476.1 times (GenBank accession nos. PX401008–37). To address persistent medium-segment dropouts, we designed flanking primers (MsegFor 5′-GCAGGTAGCTGATCTCAAG-3′, and MsegR 5′-CCAGTCCATGTAAGAGGTAC-3′) for amplification and sequencing, improving assemblies and guiding future refinement of the primer set for SNV in the northwestern United States.
We analyzed segment-wise alignments curated from GenBank in BEAST 1.10.5 (https://beast.community) (strict clock, exponential coalescent), using uniform tip sampling for incomplete collection dates (14). Estimated clock rates were 1.19 × 10−4, 1.203 × 10−4, and 1.223 × 10−4 substitutions/site/year; root-to-tip regression resulted in R2 values of 0.197 (p value 4.16 × 10–04) for the small segment, 0.067 (p-value 0.0282) for the medium segment, and 0.257 (p value 1.056 × 10–04) for the large segment, suggesting a weak temporal signal. This pattern probably reflects confounding between sampling time and geographic structure, underscoring the need for broader spatial and temporal sequencing to resolve the SNV phylogeny. Palouse sequences formed a distinct clade closest to SNV genomes from Montana collected during 2008–2009 (11) (Figure 2).
Discrete phylogeography based on the small segment tree inferred introduction into Washington from Montana circa 1915 (95% highest posterior density 1873–1982), followed by local diversification (Figure 3, panel A). Bayesian stochastic search variable selection analysis (15) shows low support for Montana–Washington movement, suggesting unsampled intermediates and illustrating the need for improved genomic surveillance. Topologic discordance among viral segments (Figure 3, panel B) supports reassortment or coinfection with segment-specific differences in within-host abundance that could influence consensus recovery. Local variants from western deer mice and montane voles cluster with high support, suggesting cross-species transmission between rodents in the northwestern United States (Figure 3, panel A).
We report SNV genome sequences from the northwestern United States, addressing a longstanding regional data gap. Our findings indicate reassortment or co-infection among sympatric rodent hosts, underscoring the complexity of SNV evolution and maintenance. Developing targeted primers to overcome chronic regional dropout enabled recovery of key genomic regions and will guide efforts to recover SNV genomes in this understudied region. Clarifying how multiple hosts contribute to virus exchange will improve understanding of transmission dynamics and zoonotic risk.
Mr. Rickard is a medical student at the University of Washington School of Medicine at the regional campus in Bozeman, Montana. His primary research interests include inclusive healthcare in rural communities. Mr. Rivero is a PhD candidate at Washington State University, Pullman, Washington. His primary research interests include the intersection of viral evolution and public health.
Acknowledgments
We thank Steven Bradfute for helpful discussions and guidance on recovering full viral genome sequences and the many field technicians who supported collections in the summer of 2023.
This publication was made possible by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention Center for Forecasting and Outbreak Analytics (cooperative agreement CDC-RFA-FT-23-0069). S.N.S., R.R., and J.H. received support from US National Science Foundation (grant no. NSF DBI 2515340).
References
- Nichol ST, Spiropoulou CF, Morzunov S, Rollin PE, Ksiazek TG, Feldmann H, et al. Genetic identification of a hantavirus associated with an outbreak of acute respiratory illness. Science. 1993;262:914–7. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schmaljohn C, Hjelle B. Hantaviruses: a global disease problem. Emerg Infect Dis. 1997;3:95–104. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Whitmer SLM, Whitesell A, Mobley M, Talundzic E, Shedroff E, Cossaboom CM, et al. Human Orthohantavirus disease prevalence and genotype distribution in the U.S., 2008–2020: a retrospective observational study. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024;37:
100836 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar - Zeitz PS, Butler JC, Cheek JE, Samuel MC, Childs JE, Shands LA, et al. A case-control study of hantavirus pulmonary syndrome during an outbreak in the southwestern United States. J Infect Dis. 1995;171:864–70. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Childs JE, Ksiazek TG, Spiropoulou CF, Krebs JW, Morzunov S, Maupin GO, et al. Serologic and genetic identification of Peromyscus maniculatus as the primary rodent reservoir for a new hantavirus in the southwestern United States. J Infect Dis. 1994;169:1271–80. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Glass GE, Cheek JE, Patz JA, Shields TM, Doyle TJ, Thoroughman DA, et al. Using remotely sensed data to identify areas at risk for hantavirus pulmonary syndrome. Emerg Infect Dis. 2000;6:238–47. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goodfellow SM, Nofchissey RA, Schwalm KC, Cook JA, Dunnum JL, Guo Y, et al. Tracing transmission of Sin Nombre virus and discovery of infection in multiple rodent species. J Virol. 2021;95:
e0153421 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar - Goodfellow SM, Nofchissey RA, Arsnoe D, Ye C, Lee S, Park J, et al. Case of human orthohantavirus infection, Michigan, USA, 2021. Emerg Infect Dis. 2024;30:817–21. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goodfellow SM, Nofchissey RA, Ye C, Banther-McConnell JK, Suriyamongkol T, Cook JA, et al. A human pathogenic hantavirus circulates and is shed in taxonomically diverse rodent reservoirs. PLoS Pathog. 2025;21:
e1012849 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar - Hadfield J, Megill C, Bell SM, Huddleston J, Potter B, Callender C, et al. Nextstrain: real-time tracking of pathogen evolution. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:4121–3. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Williamson BN, Meade-White K, Boardman K, Schulz JE, Telford CT, Figueroa Acosta DM, et al. Continuing orthohantavirus circulation in deer mice in western Montana. Viruses. 2021;13:6. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Warner BM, Stein DR, Griffin BD, Tierney K, Leung A, Sloan A, et al. Development and characterization of a Sin Nombre virus transmission model in Peromyscus maniculatus. Viruses. 2019;11:2. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Goodfellow SM, Nofchissey RA, Ye C, Dunnum JL, Cook JA, Bradfute SB. Use of a novel detection tool to survey orthohantaviruses in wild-caught rodent populations. Viruses. 2022;14:682. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Suchard MA, Lemey P, Baele G, Ayres DL, Drummond AJ, Rambaut A. Bayesian phylogenetic and phylodynamic data integration using BEAST 1.10. Virus Evol. 2018;4:
vey016 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar - Lemey P, Rambaut A, Drummond AJ, Suchard MA. Bayesian phylogeography finds its roots. PLOS Comput Biol. 2009;5:
e1000520 . DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
Figures
Table
Suggested citation for this article: Rickard G, Rivero R, Grady AC, Horton J, Lauritsen CJ, Fawcett S, et al. Genomic analysis of Sin Nombre virus sequences, northwestern United States, 2023. Emerg Infect Dis. 2026 May [date cited]. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid3205.251476
Original Publication Date: April 27, 2026
1These first authors contributed equally to this article.
Table of Contents – Volume 32, Number 1—January 2026
| EID Search Options |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:
Stephanie N. Seifert, Washington State University, Allen Center, 240 SE Ott Rd, Pullman, WA 99164, USA
Top