Volume 7, Number 4—August 2001
THEME ISSUE
West Nile Virus
West Nile Virus
Serologic Evidence for West Nile Virus Infection in Birds in the New York City Vicinity During an Outbreak in 1999
Table 4
Bird | Relative | WN virus Ab | Relative no. of | |
---|---|---|---|---|
species | abundance | prevalence [95% CI] | infections (%)a | Percentage rangeb |
House Sparrow | 6,000 | 0.60 | 4186 | 82 – 97 |
[0.36-0.81] | (92) | |||
Rock Dove | 1,000 | 0.27 | 314 | 3 – 16 |
[0.15-0.41] | (7) | |||
Mallard | 60 | 0.06 | 4 | <1 - <1 |
[0.002-0.35] | (<1) | |||
Canada Goose | 60 | 0.29 | 20 | <1 – 2 |
[0.04-0.71] | (<1) | |||
Domestic Chicken | 3 | 0.63 | 2 | <1 - <1 |
[0.55-0.71] | (<1) | |||
Domestic Goose | 1 | 0.86 | 1 | <1 - <1 |
[0.42-1.00] | (<1) |
Ab: antibody; CI: confidence interval.
aAdjusted relative to Domestic Goose.
bThis range is determined as follows for each species. For lower bound, the lowest bound of the seroprevalence CI is used to estimate the total relative number of infections; the upper bound of this CI is used for all other species. The converse is assumed for the calculation of the upper bound of the percentage.
Page created: April 27, 2012
Page updated: April 27, 2012
Page reviewed: April 27, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.