Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 7, Number 4—August 2001
THEME ISSUE
West Nile Virus
West Nile Virus

Mosquito Surveillance for West Nile Virus in Connecticut, 2000: Isolation from Culex pipiens, Cx. restuans, Cx. salinarius, and Culiseta melanura

Theodore G. AndreadisComments to Author , John F. Anderson, and Charles R. Vossbrinck
Author affiliations: Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven, Connecticut, USA

Main Article

Table 2

West Nile virus isolation data from field-collected mosquitoes trapped in Connecticut, June 1 - October 26, 2000

Location
MFIRa
Species Date collected Pool size County Site County Site Trap typeb
Culex restuans 7/11 9 Fairfield Stamford-1 1.8 6.9 G
8/7 3 Norwalk-1 32.2 G,L
8/7 7 Norwalk-2 5.4 G,L
9/20 18 Stamford-2 55.6 G,L
C. pipiens 8/30 1 Fairfield Greenwich 1.3 29.4 G
9/11 44 Stamford-3 17.2 G
9/20 50 Stamford-2 15.9 G,L
9/12 4 New Haven Meriden 1.4 41.7 L
9/21 3 Milford 76.9 G,L
C. salinarius 9/18 5 New Haven Milford 0.5 45.5 L
9/21 6 Milford 45.5 L
Culiseta melanura 9/19 39 Fairfield Fairfield 0.8 9.2 L
9/20 50 Shelton 1.3 L
10/2 7 Westport 6.8 L

aMinimum field infection rate per 1,000 mosquitoes.
bG = gravid; L = light; G,L = combined.

Main Article

Page created: April 27, 2012
Page updated: April 27, 2012
Page reviewed: April 27, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external