Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 10, Number 2—February 2004
THEME ISSUE
2004 SARS Edition
SARS Transmission

Probable Secondary Infections in Households of SARS Patients in Hong Kong

Joseph T.F. Lau*Comments to Author , Mason Lau*, Jean H. Kim*, Eric Wong*, Hi-Yi Tsui*, Thomas Tsang†, and Tze Wai Wong‡
Author affiliations: *Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People’s Republic of China (SAR); †Department of Health, Hong Kong SAR; ‡Chinese University of Hong Kong, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Hong Kong SAR

Main Article

Table 6

Summary of multivariate logistic regression model predicting “probable secondary infection” at household members (N = 2,195)

Risk factor Coefficient S.E. Odds ratio (95% CI) p value
Type of Index Person (IP)




Hospital care workers


1.00

Amoy Gardens Block E residents
2.888
0.455
17.95 (7.35 to 43.83)
< />
Amoy Gardens other Block residents
1.661
0.419
5.26 (2.32 to 11.95)
< />
Other community members
1.387
0.352
4.01 (2.01 to 7.98)
< />
IP visited by a household member




Not visited by any


1.00

Both with mask
0.571
0.412
1.77 (0.79 to 3.97)
0.166
Either one with mask
0.483
0.429
1.62 (0.70 to 3.76)
0.260
Both without mask
1.139
0.326
3.12 (1.65 to 5.91)
< />
Frequency of close contact with IP (within 1 m)a




Never


1.00

Seldom
0.466
0.338
1.59 (0.82 to 3.09)
0.168
Occasionally
0.762
0.304
2.14 (1.18 to 3.89)
0.012
Frequently
0.834
0.288
2.30 (1.31 to 4.05)
0.004
Date of IP’s fever onset




Before March 25


1.00

On or after March 25
–0.681
0.220
0.51 (0.33 to 0.78)
0.002
Duration Index person stayed home between fever onset and hospitalization (d)




≤2


1.00

3-5
0.092
0.278
1.10 (0.64 to 1.89)
0.740
≥ 6 0.655 0.278 1.93 (1.12 to 3.32) 0.018

aInformation on 13 cases and 37 controls missing.

Main Article

Page created: February 03, 2011
Page updated: February 03, 2011
Page reviewed: February 03, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external