Volume 8, Number 11—November 2002
Research
Tuberculosis-Related Deaths within a Well-Functioning DOTS Control Program
Table 2
Variables | Population attributable risk (%) | Adjusted hazard ratio | 95% CI | p valueb |
---|---|---|---|---|
Death due to TBc | ||||
Treatment default | 28.7 | 8.9 | 3.3 to 24.4 | <0.0001 |
Resistance to isoniazid and rifampin | 25.9 | 5.7 | 2.0 to 16.3 | <0.001 |
Clustered | 18.8 | 4.1 | 1.6 to 10.0 | 0.002 |
Weight loss (>15%) | — | 3.9 | 1.5 to 10.9 | 0.007 |
Formal education <6 yr | — | 1.8 | 0.6 to 5.2 | 0.3 |
Death due to other causes | ||||
HIV/AIDS | 11.1 | 33.1 | 11.4 to 95.4 | <0.0001 |
Hepatic cirrhosis | 6.6 | 5.7 | 1.6 to 19.7 | 0.006 |
Weight loss (>15% ) | — | 3.3 | 1.6 to 6.7 | 0.001 |
Age (yrs) | — | 1.02 | 0.99 to 1.04 | 0.07 |
aCI, confidence interval; —, not applicable.
bCox proportional hazards model.
cControlling for death before or after treatment completion, default or failure.
Page created: July 19, 2010
Page updated: July 19, 2010
Page reviewed: July 19, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.