Volume 9, Number 7—July 2003
Research
Hantavirus Prevalence in the IX Region of Chile
Table 1
Relationship between independent variables and seropositivity to hantaviruses, IX Region, Chile
Variables | Seropositive (total) | p value | RR (95% CI)a |
---|---|---|---|
Sex |
|||
Male |
4 (395) |
0.43 |
|
Female |
2 (435) |
||
Age |
|||
15–44 y of age |
2 (550) |
0.18 |
|
>44 y of age |
4 (280) |
||
Race |
|||
Mapuche |
2 (151) |
0.30 |
|
Other |
4 (679) |
||
Area |
|||
Andean |
6 (271) |
0.0001a |
NAb |
Central |
0 (273) |
||
Coastal |
0 (286) |
||
Risk activity or labor |
|||
Agrarianc |
|||
No activity |
1 (271) |
||
Two or more |
4 (341) |
0.38 |
|
Forestingd |
|||
No activity |
1 (279) |
||
With activity |
5 (135) |
0.018 |
9.72 (1.15 to 82.44) |
Exposure to rodents |
|||
Peridomestic |
5 (731) |
0.10 |
|
Laboral | 5 (453) | 1.00 |
ap <0.05; p values were determined by using 2-tailed Fisher exact test; RR, relative risk; CI, confidence interval.
bNot applicable.
cClearing, shrubbery cutting, working in pastures or cellars.
dForesting, working at a sawmill.
Page created: December 22, 2010
Page updated: December 22, 2010
Page reviewed: December 22, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.