Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 10, Number 12—December 2004
Synopsis

Potential Mammalian Filovirus Reservoirs

A. Townsend Peterson*Comments to Author , Darin S. Carroll†, James N. Mills†, and Karl M. Johnson‡
Author affiliations: University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA*; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA†; University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA‡

Main Article

Figure 2

Summary of numbers per species that have been tested in studies seeking filovirus infections in wild mammals (Table A1). A) Theoretical probabilities of detecting the reservoir in samples of particular sizes, given prevalences of 0.1%, 1%, and 10%. B) Frequency (1–11 species) with which species have been tested for filoviruses.

Figure 2. Summary of numbers per species that have been tested in studies seeking filovirus infections in wild mammals ([[ANCHOR###TA1###Table A1###Anchor]]). A) Theoretical probabilities of detecting the reservoir in samples of particular sizes, given prevalences of 0.1%, 1%, and 10%. B) Frequency (1–11 species) with which species have been tested for filoviruses.

Main Article

Page created: October 26, 2024
Page updated: October 26, 2024
Page reviewed: October 26, 2024
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external