Volume 10, Number 4—April 2004
Research
Predicting Geographic Variation in Cutaneous Leishmaniasis, Colombia
Table 3
Type of model | Predictors used | Accuracy measures |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUC | Maximum κ | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | ||
Single model for whole country |
Elevation |
0.66 |
0.23 |
59.9 |
65.8 |
41.3 |
80.3 |
Land cover |
0.70 |
0.28 |
53.4 |
75.7 |
46.9 |
80.2 |
|
All |
0.72 |
0.34 |
55.3 |
79.3 |
51.8 |
81.6 |
|
Combination of zonal models |
Elevation |
0.70 |
0.28 |
53.7 |
75.2 |
46.5 |
80.2 |
Land cover |
0.82 |
0.46 |
67.0 |
80.6 |
58.1 |
85.9 |
|
All | 0.84 | 0.54 | 62.8 | 89.1 | 69.8 | 85.6 |
aACL, American cutaneous leishmaniasis; AUC, area under receiver-operator curve; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV are calculated at the probability threshold that gives the highest value of kappa.
bFor all comparisons of observations against predictions, χ2 > 79.2, df =1, p < 0.0001. κ values are given by (proportion correct – Proportion expected)/(1- proportion expected), where proportion correct = (a + d)/n, and proportion expected = (a + b) x (a + c) + (c + d) x (b + d)/n2. a = true positive predictions, b = false positive, c = false negative, d = true negative, n = total.
Page created: February 09, 2011
Page updated: February 09, 2011
Page reviewed: February 09, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.