Volume 10, Number 6—June 2004
Research
Sporadic Cryptosporidiosis, North Cumbria, England, 1996–2000
Table 1
Exclusion criteria | No. (%) excluded |
---|---|
Case-patients (n = 207) | |
Refusal to participate | 1 (0.5) |
Could not complete adequate interview | 1 (0.5) |
Did not respond to letters or phone calls | 2 (1.0) |
Not meeting the study case definition | |
No history of diarrhea | 1 (0.5) |
Mixed enteric infection | 1 (0.5) |
Secondary case | 36 (17.4) |
Travel outside the UK in 14 days before onset | 8 (3.9) |
Travel in UK outside study area for >7 nights in the 14 days before onset | 1 (0.5) |
Visitor to study area | 1 (0.5) |
Residence outside study area | 1 (0.5) |
Case-patient or household member previously interviewed as case-patient or control | 2(1.0) |
Total potential cases excluded |
55 (26.6) |
Total cases enrolled | 152 (73.4) |
Controls (n = 778) | |
Refusal to participate in interview | 23 (3.0) |
Unavailable at requested interview times | 125 (16.1) |
Said interview times were not convenient | 35 (4.5) |
Subtotal: refused, unavailable for interview | 183 (23.5) |
Address not found | 3 (0.4) |
History of diarrhea | 46 (5.9) |
Travel outside UK in the 14 days before interview | 8 (1.0) |
Travel in UK outside study area for >7 nights in the 14 days before interview | 2 (0.3) |
Not resident in study area in the 14 days before interview | 3 (0.4) |
Moved from study area | 27 (3.5) |
Resident outside study area | 2 (0.3) |
Control or household member already interviewed as a case-patient or control | 7 (0.9) |
Subtotal: did not meet study control definition | 95 (12.2) |
Interview cancelled by study team because three controls already enrolled for associated case | 19 (2.4) |
Interview cancelled by study team as potential control found to be in wrong age group | 9 (1.2) |
Reason for exclusion not recorded | 3 (0.4) |
Subtotal: not enrolled for administrative reasons or reason not recorded | 31 (4.0) |
Total potential controls excluded |
312 (40.1) |
Total controls enrolled | 466 (59.9) |
Page created: February 22, 2011
Page updated: February 22, 2011
Page reviewed: February 22, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.