Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 10, Number 9—September 2004

Eosinophilic Pleural Effusion in Gnathostomiasis

On This Page
Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus

Cite This Article

To the Editor: Moore et al. reported a case series of patients infected with imported gnathostomiasis who had typical intermittent, migratory skin manifestations or peripheral blood eosinophilia or both, as well as undiagnosed eosinophilia with nonspecific symptoms (1). We would like to add some comments based on a recent patient treated in Marseilles, France.

In April 2003, a 66-year-old man living in Marseilles indicated a history of fever for 8 days. He had returned from Vietnam 1 month earlier, where he had stayed for 4 weeks in the Ho Chi Minh City area and 2 days in the Mekong Delta area. He was well during his trip, and reported no arthropod bites except from mosquitoes. He had no direct skin contact with river water. Dietary intake included local dishes with rice, fish, pork, shrimp, and chicken. His symptoms started 3 weeks after he returned to Marseilles and included fever (38°C), asthenia, chills (1 day), moderate dyspnea during exercise, transient bilateral pain of the testes, and an episode of hemospermia. He was referred by his family doctor to the Infectious and Tropical Diseases Unit, North Hospital.

On admission, the patient’s temperature was 38°C. Physical examination of the patient, including the testes, was normal except for a systolic heart murmur (preexisting and known to the patient), and clinical signs of left pleural effusion. The effusion was subsequently confirmed by chest x-ray, which also showed a discrete diffuse bilateral lung infiltrate. Results of routine laboratory tests conducted on blood samples were normal except for an elevated eosinophil count of 5.2 109/L. Blood smears for plasmodia and microfilaremia were negative. Urologic examination, including echography and prostate-specific antigen, showed no abnormalities except a prostatic adenoma (preexisting and known to the patient). No eggs or parasites were detected by microscopic examination in stools or in urine, although both sedimented and centrifuged urine specimens were studied and filtration techniques were used. After transthoracic aspiration of 100 mL of pleural effusion, cytologic examination showed an eosinophil count of 5,800/L without parasites. Bacterial culture, including mycobacteria, was negative. On day 4, the patient was afebrile and was discharged. On admission, results of a first set of examinations involving reactivities to schistosomiasis, paragonimiasis, strongyloidiasis, cysticercosis, trichinosis, gnathostomiasis, filariasis, and toxocariasis were negative.

One month later, the eosinophil count of our patient had decreased to 1.8 x 109/L. He was afebrile, and his only complaint was asthenia. A new set of serologic examinations was conducted. The Western blot assay for gnathostomiasis conducted at the Swiss Tropical Institute (Socinstrasse 57, CH-4002, Basel, Switzerland) was positive, showing immunoglobulin G reactivity to four specific bands including the 24-kDa band, considered pathognomonic for the diagnosis of Gnathostoma infection (1). The seroconversion confirmed the diagnosis of gnathostomiasis. All other serologic tests remained negative, except an increase of antibodies against Acanthocheilonema vitae used as antigen for unspecific serologic screening for filariasis (Laboratoire Marcel Merieux, Lyon, France). After a 21-day course of albendazole and a single dose of ivermectin, the eosinophil count of our patient decreased to 0.8 x 109/L.

Three aspects of gnathostomiasis as an emerging imported disease can complement the findings of Moore et al. (1). First, the clinical findings in our case are very unusual. Hemospermia is often benign with predominant causes including prostatic and seminal vesicle disease. Infections, including mainly schistosomiasis and tuberculosis, have been associated with these symptoms (2). Although our patient had a prostatic adenoma, this is the first time that hemospermia has been associated with gnathostomiasis. Because of the anxiety hemospermia caused, this symptom was the main reason that our patient consulted our center. Secondly, eosinophilic pleural effusion is also unusual in gnathosthosmiasis. Although reported as a potential cause in reference books (3), a Medline search (key words: gnathostomiasis and eosinophilia and pleural effusion or pleuritis or lung) disclosed only two references to pleural effusion as the main symptom of gnathostomiasis (4,5). The eosinophilic pleural and pulmonary response may be elicited by the larvae of helminths carried hematogenously into lungs and pleura in an aberrant fashion (3). The last point we stress is that, as shown by Moore et al. (1), patients returning from disease-endemic areas, mainly Southeast Asia and Central and South America, should be tested systematically for gnathostomiasis. Although some patients show a typical cutaneous form of gnathostomiasis associated with eosinophilia (6,7), most atypical forms are probably underdiagnosed, and severe neurologic involvement may occur if treatment is not given (1). However, until recently specific serologic tests for gnathostomiasis were available only in Asia, mainly in Thailand and Japan. Some laboratories in Europe currently provide testing for gnathostomiasis, which would be a valuable aid in evaluating patients returning from the tropics.


Philippe Parola*Comments to Author , Gerard Bordmann†, Philippe Brouqui*, and Jean Delmont*
Author affiliations: *Hopital Nord, Marseille, France; †Swiss Tropical Institute, Basel, Switzerland



  1. Moore DA, McCroddan J, Chiodini PL. Gnathostomiasis: an emerging imported disease.Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:64750.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Mulhall JP, Albertsen PC. Hemospermia: diagnosis and management.Urology. 1995;46:4637. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Wilson ME, Weller PF. Eosinophilia. Tropical infectious diseases. In: Guerrant RL, Walker DH, Weller PF, editors. Principles, pathogens, and practice. Philadelphia: Churchill Livingstone; 1999. p. 1400–19.
  4. Dow C, Chiodini PL, Haines AJ, Michelson SM. Human gnathostomiasis.J Infect. 1988;17:1479. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Nagler A, Pollack S, Hassoun G, Kerner H, Barzilai D, Lengy J. Human pleuropulmonary gnathostomiasis: a case report from Israel.Isr J Med Sci. 1983;19:8347.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Menard A, Dos Santos G, Dekumyoy P, Ranque S, Delmont J, Danis M, Imported cutaneous gnathostomiasis: report of five cases.Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2003;97:2002. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gnathostomiasis PP. Lancet. 2001;358:332.


Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1009.030671

Related Links


Table of Contents – Volume 10, Number 9—September 2004

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Philippe Parola, Service des Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales, Hopital Nord, AP-HM, Chemin des bourrelys, 13015, Marseilles, France; fax: 33-4-91-96-89-38

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: March 25, 2011
Page updated: March 25, 2011
Page reviewed: March 25, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.