Volume 10, Number 9—September 2004
Research
Computer Algorithms To Detect Bloodstream Infections
Table 2
Determination | Method | No. culturesc | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | κ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hospital vs. community acquisition | Computer rule A | 77 | 97 | 73 | 0.74 |
ICP review | 77 | 94 | 67 | 0.62 | |
Infection vs. contaminationd | Computer rule B2e | 43 | 77 | 71 | 0.49 |
ICP review | 43 | 77 | 76 | 0.53 | |
Primary vs. secondary | Computer rule C2f | 76 | 90 | 57 | 0.49 |
ICP review | 76 | 83 | 64 | 0.48 |
aOur reference standard.
bThe single best rule for each determination is displayed.
cSince all determinations were not made for each blood culture, e.g., contaminants often were not further categorized, the number of cultures evaluated varies.
dInfection determination is presented for common skin commensals only; other organisms were considered as infections; see Table 1 for definitions.
eRule B2 evaluated microbiology and pharmacy results; see Table 1.
fRule C2 evaluated microbiology results during the entire length of stay; see Table 1.
Page created: March 25, 2011
Page updated: March 25, 2011
Page reviewed: March 25, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.