Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 10, Number 9—September 2004

Baylisascaris procyonis in California

On This Page
Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus

Cite This Article

To the Editor: We read with interest the article of Roussere et al. on the distribution of Baylisascaris procyonis eggs in northern California communities (1). The widespread dissemination and high density of raccoon latrines in residential areas clearly pose potential health risks, particularly to young children.

While California has reported more cases of baylisascariasis than any other state, few published studies have reported on the distribution and prevalence of this helminth in the region. In 2001, we conducted a study to determine the presence of B. procyonis in the Santa Barbara area by examining roadkill raccoons recovered by animal control staff and stored in a refrigerated facility. On examination, the digestive tract from the stomach to the rectum was removed and tested for B. procyonis worms and eggs. Of 26 raccoons examined, 24 (92%, 95% confidence interval 75%–99%) were positive for B. procyonis infection. B. procyonis worms were found in 85% of the animals examined and eggs were found in 73%. Pet food was frequently found (43%) in the stomach contents of examined raccoons, indicating that such food was made accessible to these animals, either intentionally or inadvertently by residents.

B. procyonis has been identified along the central coast of California, which expands the known range of this helminthic zoonotic agent. This finding, coupled with other published studies, indicates that Baylisascaris may be prevalent throughout the state (1,2). Although our study was based on a small sample of selected raccoons, the high infection rate is cause for concern and indicates the potential for human exposure. A presumptive case of B. procyonis infection in an 11-month-old child was reported in Santa Barbara in 2003 (1).

Determining the distribution and prevalence of B. procyonis is necessary to inform local healthcare providers, public health authorities, and the public of the potential risk. Using road-kill raccoons is a relatively easy method for quickly assessing the presence of B. procyonis in a community. Also, this approach avoids trapping and handling live animals and allows stomach contents to be examined to determine where raccoons are feeding. Data from such assessments must be interpreted with caution, since they may not represent all raccoons in an area.


Laurel Moore*, Lawrence Ash*, Frank J. Sorvillo*Comments to Author , and O.G.W. Berlin*
Author affiliations: *University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA



  1. Roussere  GP, Murray  WJ, Raudenbush  CB, Kutilek  MJ, Levee  DJ, Kazacos  KR. Raccoon roundworm eggs near homes and risk for larva migrans disease, California communities. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:151623.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Evans  RH. Baylisascaris procyonis (Nematoda: Ascaridae) in raccoons (Procyon lotor) in Orange County, California. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2001;1:23942. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar


Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1009.040034

Related Links


Table of Contents – Volume 10, Number 9—September 2004

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Frank J. Sorvillo, 313 N. Figueroa Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012, USA; fax: 714-816-9099

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: March 29, 2011
Page updated: March 29, 2011
Page reviewed: March 29, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.