Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 10, Number 9—September 2004

Barriers to Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Autopsies, California

Janice K. Louie*†Comments to Author , Shilpa S. Gavali*, Ermias D. Belay‡, Rosalie Trevejo†, Lucinda H. Hammond*, Lawrence B. Schonberger‡, and Duc J. Vugia*†
Author affiliations: *California Emerging Infections Program, Richmond, California, USA; †California Department of Health Services, Berkeley, California, USA; ‡Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Main Article

Table 2

Perceptions of California neurologists, pathologists, and neuropathologists regarding performance of autopsy in Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD)

Characteristic Neurologists 
n/N (%) Pathologists 
n/N (%) Neuropathologists 
n/N (%)
Important reasons to obtain autopsy for CJD patients
  Autopsy is needed to confirm CJD diagnosis 92/197 (47) 11/21 (52)
  Autopsy is needed to rule out variant CJD or other TSEa forms 168/231 (73) 87/193 (45) 12/20 (60)
Barriers to performing autopsy and histopathologic analysis for CJD
  Clinicians do not feel autopsy is required for diagnosis 94/221 (43) 72/198 (36) 7/21 (33)
  Facilities not able/willing to perform autopsies on CJD patients 75/234 (32) 111/210 (53) 8/22 (36)
  Families are reluctant to give consent for autopsy 192/242 (79) 57/202 (28) 6/22 (27)
  Cost of autopsy is a concern to patient’s family 113/234 (48) 34/202 (17) 8/20 (40)
  Cost of autopsy is a concern to hospital/institution 78/234 (34) 40/199 (20) 8/21 (38)
  Infection control is a concern regarding autopsy 102/235 (44) 143/185 (77) 9/11 (82)
  Facilities are inadequate to perform autopsy 24/185 (13) 5/11 (45)
  Infection control is a concern regarding histopathologic evaluation 62/111 (56) 4/8 (50)
  No available pathologists experienced in recognizing histopathologic features of CJD 69/111 (62) 1/8 (13)

aTSE, transmissible spongiform encephalopathy.

Main Article

Page created: March 29, 2011
Page updated: March 29, 2011
Page reviewed: March 29, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.