Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 11, Number 10—October 2005
Research

Community-associated Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Minnesota, 2000–2003

Jessica M. Buck*Comments to Author , Kathryn Como-Sabetti*, Kathleen H. Harriman*, Richard N. Danila*, David J. Boxrud*, Anita Glennen*, and Ruth Lynfield*
Author affiliations: *Minnesota Department of Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

Main Article

Table 3

Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) invasive disease patient and skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI) patient isolate characteristics*

Antimicrobial agent Invasive disease isolates (n = 57),
no. (% susceptible) SSTI isolates (n = 517),
no. (% susceptible) OR (95% CI) p value† p value‡
Oxacillin (methicillin) 0 0 NA
Ciprofloxacin 37 (65) 433 (84) 3.34 (1.67–6.69) 0.002 0.23
Clindamycin 44 (77) 475 (92) 2.79 (1.54–5.04) 0.001 0.20
Erythromycin 21 (37) 201 (39) 1.09 (0.62–1.92)
Gentamicin 56 (98) 509 (98) 1.14 (0.14–9.25)
Linezolid 57 (100) 517 (100) NA
Mupirocin 56 (98) 508 (98) 1.14 (0.14–9.23)
Rifampin 56 (98) 515 (99) 4.60 (0.41–51.5)
Tetracyline 52 (91) 469 (91) 0.94 (0.36–2.46)
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole 56 (98) 514 (99) 3.06 (0.31–2.99)
Vancomycin 57 (100) 517 (100) NA

*OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; NA, not applicable.
†Refers to the probablility that the percentage susceptible for invasive CA-MRSA isolates differed from SSTI CA-MRSA isolates after controlling for sex and age.
‡Refers to the probability that the percentage susceptible for invasive CA-MRSA isolates differed from SSTI CA-MRSA isolates after controlling for sex and pulsed-field type associated with healthcare-associated MRSA or CA-MRSA.

Main Article

Page created: February 22, 2012
Page updated: February 22, 2012
Page reviewed: February 22, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external