Volume 11, Number 3—March 2005
Research
SARS Risk Perceptions in Healthcare Workers, Japan
Teppei Imai*, Ken Takahashi*
, Tsutomu Hoshuyama*, Naoki Hasegawa†, Meng-Kin Lim‡, and David Koh‡
, Tsutomu Hoshuyama*, Naoki Hasegawa†, Meng-Kin Lim‡, and David Koh‡
Table 4
Factors associated with concept of institutional measures (effectiveness) and perception of risk (selected factors) by job category
| Variable* | OR (95% CI)† |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physician (N = 1,370) | Nurse (N = 3,274) | Other (N = 2,638) | Total (N = 7,282) | |
| Effectiveness | ||||
| I-score (0,1,2,3) | 1.87 (1.65–2.13) | 1.83 (1.69–1.98) | 2.02 (1.84–2.22) | 1.90 (1.80–2.01) |
| Age (>35 year) | 1.23 (0.93–1.62) | 1.19 (0.99–1.41) | 1.42 (1.15–1.74) | 1.25 (1.11–1.41) |
| K-score (low, middle, high) | 0.89 (0.72–1.10) | 1.01 (0.88–1.17) | 0.96 (0.82–1.11) | 0.97 (0.88–1.06) |
| Type of facility (university) | 0.82 (0.59–1.15) | 0.71 (0.60–0.84) | 0.75 (0.60–0.92) | 0.74 (0.65–0.83) |
| Sex (women) | 0.79 (0.53–1.18) | 0.63 (0.38–1.06) | 0.97 (0.79–1.18) | 1.00 (0.88–1.14) |
| Fear (+) | 0.61 (0.46–0.80) | 0.90 (0.76–1.06) | 0.58 (0.47–0.70) | 0.72 (0.64–0.81) |
| Avoidance of patient | ||||
| Fear (+) | 1.91 (1.33–2.76) | 2.56 (1.89–3.48) | 2.32 (1.66–3.24) | 2.31 (1.91–2.80) |
| K-score (low, middle, high) | 1.42 (1.10–1.84) | 1.01 (0.78–1.30) | 1.23 (0.98–1.56) | 1.19 (1.03–1.37) |
| Sex (women) | 1.27 (0.76–2.13) | 1.95 (0.91–4.21) | 2.05 (1.50–2.82) | 1.93 (1.59–2.33) |
| Age (>35 year) | 1.00 (0.70–1.42) | 0.58 (0.42–0.79) | 0.84 (0.60–1.17) | 0.81 (0.67–0.97) |
| Type of facility (university) | 0.91 (0.57–1.43) | 0.83 (0.59–1.16) | 0.75 (0.52–1.08) | 0.82 (0.66–1.01) |
| I-score (0,1,2,3) | 0.80 (0.68–0.94) | 0.87 (0.75–0.99) | 0.80 (0.69–0.93) | 0.81 (0.75–0.88) |
| Acceptance of risk | ||||
| I-score (0,1,2,3) | 1.26 (1.11–1.42) | 1.08 (1.01–1.16) | 1.24 (1.14–1.35) | 1.18 (1.12–1.24) |
| Age (>35 year) | 1.05 (0.81–1.36) | 1.27 (1.06–1.51) | 1.11 (0.93–1.33) | 1.10 (0.99–1.22) |
| Fear (+) | 1.01 (0.78–1.30) | 1.14 (0.97–1.33) | 1.44 (1.21–1.71) | 1.21 (1.09–1.34) |
| Sex (women) | 1.01 (0.71–1.43) | 0.65 (0.38–1.12) | 0.85 (0.71–1.02) | 0.82 (0.73–0.92) |
| K-score (low, middle, high) | 0.90 (0.74–1.10) | 1.05 (0.92–1.20) | 1.04 (0.91–1.18) | 1.03 (0.95–1.12) |
| Type of facility (university) | 0.81 (0.58–1.14) | 0.98 (0.83–1.15) | 1.20 (0.99–1.45) | 1.04 (0.93–1.17) |
*Goodness-of-fit was satisfactory: ranged from [goodness-of-fit statistics = 0.49 with 8 df (p = 0.99)] for (effectiveness) x (physician) to [goodness-of-fit statistics = 12.71 with 8 df (p = 0.12)] for (nurse) x (avoidance), except for [goodness-of-fit statistics = 18.98 with 8 df (p = 0.02)] for (nurse) x (effectiveness) and [goodness-of-fit statistics = 18.38 with 8 df (p = 0.02)] for (others) x (effectiveness).
†OR, odds ratio calculated by logistic regression; CI, confidence interval.
Page created: April 25, 2012
Page updated: April 25, 2012
Page reviewed: April 25, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.