Volume 11, Number 9—September 2005
Telithromycin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae
Highlight and copy the desired format.
|EID||Goldstein FW, Vidal B, Kitzis MD. Telithromycin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11(9):1489-1490. https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1109.050415|
|AMA||Goldstein FW, Vidal B, Kitzis MD. Telithromycin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2005;11(9):1489-1490. doi:10.3201/eid1109.050415.|
|APA||Goldstein, F. W., Vidal, B., & Kitzis, M. D. (2005). Telithromycin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 11(9), 1489-1490. https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1109.050415.|
To the Editor: In recent years, antimicrobial drug resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae has increased worldwide and is a major health concern. Resistance to β-lactams and macrolides, considered to be first-line therapeutic agents, is particularly high in France and many Asian countries (1–3). Resistance to new fluoroquinolones is reported with increasing frequency, which emphasizes the need for new effective drugs. Telithromycin, the first member of a new macrolide family, the ketolides, has been developed to overcome macrolide resistance. In vitro data have shown that telithromycin remains active against 98% to 100% of erythromycin-resistant strains (2,3).
However, resistant mutants have been isolated in vitro, and a few poorly documented clinical failures have been reported in the treatment of pneumococcal infections. We report the first isolation of telithromycin-resistant S. pneumoniae from a blood culture after therapy.
An 87-year-old woman was admitted on March 28, 2004, to St Joseph Hospital in Paris with typical upper left lobar pneumonia, as inferred from auscultatory results, radiologic findings, and laboratory data: leukocytes 37,300 cells/μL, C-reactive protein 455 mg/L, and positive urinary pneumococcal antigen (BinaxNOW, Binax, Inc., Portland, ME, USA). She was not febrile. She had been followed for many years for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), with acute exacerbation only in 2001. At that time, she was treated with the macrolide roxithromycin, without bacteriologic documentation, in addition to acetylcysteine (3 × 200 mg/d) and aerosolized terbutaline. On March 13, her COPD was exacerbated. On March 20, she visited her general practitioner and received 800 mg/day telithromycin for 5 days without improvement. Because of a cutaneous rash attributed to telithromycin, she received 20 mg prednisolone. After 48 hours, she was admitted to St Joseph Hospital because her respiratory syndrome was aggravated. A blood culture drawn on admission yielded a S. pneumoniae serotype 14 with decreased β-lactam susceptibility (MICs: penicillin G: 1 μg/mL; amoxicillin: 0.75 μg/mL; cefotaxime: 0.5 μg/mL, as determined by Etest). The strain was resistant to tetracyclines, cotrimoxazole, macrolides, and lincosamides (erythromycin and clindamycin MIC >32 μg/mL). The MIC of telithromycin, performed on Mueller-Hinton agar + 5% horse blood by serial 2-fold dilution, was equal to 2 μg/mL in air and 8 μg/mL under CO2 (0.01–0.03 μg/mL for control strains ATCC 49619 and 10 clinical isolates, including 5 that were MLSB [macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B]–resistant). The patient was treated with 100 mg/kg/day intravenous amoxicillin and improved within 48 hours. She was discharged from the hospital 1 week later in good condition but remained a healthy carrier of resistant S. pneumoniae.
Resistance to macrolides has been documented in France since our first report in 1978 (4). In the last 10 years, resistance has increased to ≈50% of the strains in adults and >70% in children, the highest in the Western world. More than 98% of the strains are of the MLSB phenotype, conferring high-level resistance to macrolides, lincosamides, and streptogramin B, in contrast to the situation in the United States, where most strains are of the mefE type (efflux), which confers low-level resistance to 14- and 15-membered macrolides only. However, <2% of the macrolide-resistant strains have a decreased susceptibility to telithromycin (2,3). Resistance to β-lactams is also very frequent (≈50%), particularly in erythromycin-resistant strains (<90%); these figures explain why macrolides may more likely select a penicillin-resistant strain than most β-lactams (5). Since resistance to telithromycin was documented before ketolides were introduced in clinical practice, we cannot exclude the possibility that the telithromycin-resistant strain was selected in 2001, while our patient was treated with roxithromycin.
The clinical impact of macrolide resistance has been occasionally questioned since these antimicrobial agents achieve high tissue and intracellular levels. However, S. pneumoniae is an extracellular bacterial pathogen; well-designed clinical studies have documented the failure of macrolides in treating high-level resistant strains with an MLSB phenotype (6). After an 800-mg oral dose, telithromycin achieves serum and epithelial lining fluid concentrations of 2.2 and 15 μg/mL, respectively, yielding a free drug concentration of 0.7 μg/mL in serum and 15 μg/mL in epithelial lining fluid. In an excellent in vitro model, telithromycin eradicated S. pneumoniae of the mefE phenotype with MICs >0.25 and 1 μg/mL (7). The drug was not effective against strains with MICs 2–8 μg/mL, as was seen in our patient. When incubated under CO2, MICs of macrolides increase by 1 dilution compared to the MIC in air, against both susceptible and resistant strains. With telithromycin, the MIC increase is 2–6 dilutions but only for macrolide-resistant strains (8). The clinical impact of this finding is still to be determined. This report emphasizes the need for routine testing of S. pneumoniae isolates for resistance to telithromycin.
We thank E. Varon for determining the serotype of the strain and P. Courvalin for critical review of the manuscript and editorial assistance.
- Song JH, Chang HH, Suh JY, Ko KS, Jung SI, Oh WS, Macrolide resistance and genotypic characterization of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Asian countries: a study of the Asian network for surveillance of resistant pathogens (ANSORP). J Antimicrob Chemother. 2004;53:457–63.
- Leclercq R. Overcoming antimicrobial resistance: profile of a new ketolide antibacterial, telithromycin. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2001;48:9–23.
- Farrell J, Felmingham D. Activities of telithromycin against 13,874 Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates collected between 1999 and 2003. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48:1882–4.
- Goldstein FW, Dang Van A, Bouanchaud DH, Acar JF. Increased resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae to antibiotic and prevalence of their capsular serotypes. Pathol Biol (Paris). 1978;26:173–80.
- Goldstein FW. Penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae: section by beta-lactam and non-beta-lactam antibiotics. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999;44:141–4.
- Lonks JR. What is the clinical impact of macrolide resistance? Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2004;6:7–12.
- Zhanel G, Johanson C, Laing N, Hisanaga T, Wierzbowski A, Hoban DJ. Pharmacodynamic activity of telithromycin at simulated clinically achievable free-drug concentrations in serum and epithelial lining fluid against efflux (mefE)-producing macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae for which telithromycin MICs vary. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49:1943–8.
- Batard E, Juvin ME, Jacqueline C, Bugnon D, Caillon J, Potel G, Influence of carbon dioxide on the MIC of telithromycin for Streptococcus pneumoniae: an in vitro–in vivo study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49:464–6.
Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:
Fred W. Goldstein, Hospital Saint Joseph, 185 Rue Raymond Losserand, Paris, France, 75014; fax: 33-1-44-123685; 7
Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
- Page created: April 23, 2012
- Page last updated: April 23, 2012
- Page last reviewed: April 23, 2012
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID)
Office of the Director (OD)