Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 12, Number 3—March 2006
Dispatch

Canine Leptospirosis, United States, 2002–2004

George E. Moore*Comments to Author , Lynn F. Guptill*, Nita W. Glickman*, Richard J. Caldanaro*, David AuCoin†, and Lawrence T. Glickman*
Author affiliations: *Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA; †VCA Antech, Los Angeles, California, USA

Main Article

Figure 2

Canine leptospirosis microscopic agglutination test results shown as the percentage positive and standard error, by state and year from 2002–2004. A test was considered positive if the titer for any serovar was >400 for Autumnalis, Bratislava, Canicola, Grippotyphosa, Icterohaemorrhagiae, Pomona, or Hardjo serovars.

Figure 2. Canine leptospirosis microscopic agglutination test results shown as the percentage positive and standard error, by state and year from 2002–2004. A test was considered positive if the titer for any serovar was >400 for Autumnalis, Bratislava, Canicola, Grippotyphosa, Icterohaemorrhagiae, Pomona, or Hardjo serovars.

Main Article

Page created: January 27, 2012
Page updated: January 27, 2012
Page reviewed: January 27, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external