Volume 12, Number 5—May 2006
Dispatch
Clostridium difficile Ribotype 027, Toxinotype III, the Netherlands
Table
Hospital no. and setting | No. beds | Admissions |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Incidence/ 10,000, before outbreak | Maximum incidence/ mo/10,000, during outbreak† | Date of outbreak onset | Total no. CDAD patients in given period, 2005 | Deaths, 30 d | No. strains studied | No. toxinotype III, PCR ribotype 027 strains | ||
1. Harderwijk | 341 | 4 | 83 | Apr 2005 | 51, Apr–Nov | 3 | 30 | 19 |
2. Amersfoort | 600 | 11 | 87 | May 2005 | 85, Jan–Dec | 19 | 50 | 15 |
3. Utrecht | 1,013 | 16 | – | No outbreak | 37, Jun–Dec | Unk. | 17 | 6 |
4. Nieuwegein | 584 | 11 | – | No outbreak | 13, Jan–Dec | Unk. | 4 | 1 |
5. Amsterdam | 1,002 | 38 | 52 | June 2005 | 68, Jan–Oct | 1 | 28 | 12 |
6. Amsterdam | 310 | 10 | 66 | Apr–May 2005 | 42, Jan–Oct | Unk. | 34 | 16 |
7. Haarlem | 744 | 7 | 27 | 2004 | 66, Jan–Dec | Unk. | 9 | 7 |
8. Hoofddorp | 455 | 3 | 76 | Jan 2005 | 73, Jan–Dec | Unk. | 8 | 8 |
9. Beverwijk | 383 | 4 | 47 | 2002 | 24, Jan–Dec | Unk. | 4 | 3 |
*PCR, polymerase chain reaction; CDAD, Clostridium difficile–associated diarrhea; unk., unknown.
†Timeframe 2–4 mo.
Page created: January 12, 2012
Page updated: January 12, 2012
Page reviewed: January 12, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.