Volume 12, Number 7—July 2006
Research
Epidemiologic and Molecular Analysis of Human Tularemia, United States, 1964–2004
Table 1
Number of type A and type B Francisella tularensis isolates, United States, 1964–2004*
| State | Type A | Type B | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alaska | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Arizona | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Arkansas | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| California | 3 | 7 | 10 |
| Colorado | 19 | 8 | 27 |
| Delaware | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Georgia | 5 | 1 | 6 |
| Idaho | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Illinois | 2 | 6 | 8 |
| Indiana | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| Iowa | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Kansas | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Kentucky | 3 | 20 | 23 |
| Louisiana | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Maine | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Maryland | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Michigan | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Minnesota | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mississippi | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Missouri | 12 | 8 | 20 |
| Montana | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Nebraska | 6 | 1 | 7 |
| Nevada | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| New Jersey | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| New Mexico | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| New York | 5 | 3 | 8 |
| North Carolina | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| North Dakota | 3 | 5 | 8 |
| Ohio | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Oklahoma | 14 | 1 | 15 |
| Oregon | 8 | 14 | 22 |
| Pennsylvania | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| South Dakota | 9 | 4 | 13 |
| Tennessee | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Texas | 4 | 1 | 5 |
| Utah | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Virginia | 9 | 1 | 10 |
| Washington | 0 | 8 | 8 |
| Wyoming | 13 | 3 | 16 |
| Unknown | 2 | 2 | 4 |
| Total | 208 | 108 | 316 |
*Submitted to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
1These authors contributed equally to this article.
Page created: December 16, 2011
Page updated: December 16, 2011
Page reviewed: December 16, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.