Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 12, Number 8—August 2006

Classifying Escherichia coli

On This Page
Article Metrics
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus

Cite This Article

To the Editor: Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC), 1 of the 6 pathotypes of diarrheogenic E. coli (DEC), promotes attaching-effacing lesions in eukaryotic cells. These lesions are mediated by intimin, an outer membrane adhesive protein encoded by the eae (E. coli attaching-effacing) gene (1). EPEC is currently subdivided into typical and atypical subgroups. While typical EPEC carry the EPEC adherence factor plasmid (pEAF) that encodes the bundle-forming pilus (BFP) and a complex regulator of various virulence genes (Per) (1), atypical EPEC is devoid of pEAF (or does not express a functional BFP) (1,2). Typical EPEC expresses the localized pattern of adherence (LA), which is characterized by compact bacterial clusters on HeLa and HEp-2 cells (1). Conversely, atypical EPEC most often expresses the LA-like pattern (with loose bacterial clusters) or adherence patterns of other DEC pathotypes (2).

Enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC), another DEC pathotype, is identified by the characteristic aggregative pattern of adherence (AA) in HeLa/HEp-2 cells; bacteria attach in aggregates to cell surfaces as well as around cells (1,3). EAEC colonizes the intestinal mucosa, forming a thick biofilm that favors prolonged colonization and induces malnutrition (13). Actually, this pathotype is heterogeneous regarding the presence of putative virulence genes and has recently been subgrouped into typical and atypical EAEC, which carry and lack AggR (a global regulator of EAEC virulence), respectively (1,3).

We recently conducted a study at the Instituto de Puericultura e Pediatria Martagão Gesteria in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, on the etiology of diarrhea affecting children of low socioeconomic status (V.B.C. Girão et al., unpub. data). In the study, all E. coli isolates were analyzed regarding their adherence patterns in HeLa cells and the presence of specific virulence genes of the DEC pathotypes, according to previously reported methods (4,5). Among 481 children (<2 years old) with diarrhea who were examined, 16 (3.3%) carried E. coli strains that co-expressed LA and AA (LA/AA), a phenotype not found among strains of 99 control children without diarrhea at the same hospital. The LA/AA phenotype was confirmed in individual colonies of each strain as well as in HEp-2 cells. In both cell lineages, prolonged assays (6 hours) showed that a mature biofilm that masked the LA phenotype had developed.

Although LA/AA co-expression in some human E. coli has been previously reported by Bouzari et al. (6), further information on these isolates is lacking. Moreover, since the expression of LA and AA is used to classify fecal E. coli as typical EPEC and EAEC (1,3), respectively, the classification of such strains within the DEC pathotypes is difficult. To determine their most appropriate classification, we further characterized the 16 LA/AA strains of our collection (Table). Colony hybridization assays used to search for additional E. coli virulence genes (bfpA, perA, E-hly, daaC, cdt, cnf, hly, aggR, aggC, aafC, aap, shf, irp2, pet, pic, astA, pap, afa, sfa, efa, paa, saa, enfA) (1,35,7) showed that all strains carried eae, bfpA, and perA, and 13 also carried the EAF sequence (a cryptic pEAF marker). Less commonly found genes were paa, shf, irp2, astA, and efa, and the remaining genes were absent. BFP expression was confirmed in all strains by immunoblot, and positivity in the fluorescent actin staining assay (8) demonstrated that they can produce attaching/effacing lesions. PCR analysis of 4 (α, β, γ, and δ) (9) of at least 10 recognized intimin subtypes (1) showed that subtype δ was the most frequent. Serotyping (5) identified at least 10 distinct serotypes among the 16 strains, which demonstrated that they do not make up a single clone. Two serotypes (O119:H6 and O142:H6) are commonly found among typical EPEC (2). Certain typical and atypical EPEC serotypes have been associated with distinct intimin subtypes (9). Likewise, our LA/AA strains of the same serotype carried the same intimin subtype. Recently, Carvalho et al. (10) detected LA/AA expression in 4 of 21 eae-positive E. coli strains isolated from monkeys with diarrhea. All 4 strains expressed BFP and lacked the EAF sequence; as in our study, 1 belonged to serotype O142:H6 and carried intimin α.

E. coli classification within the DEC pathotypes has epidemiologic and clinical implications for managing diarrheal diseases. However, finding E. coli isolates that co-express LA/AA reiterates the difficulty of assigning bacteria to groups on the basis of their adherence phenotype or genotype (particularly when based on mobile genetic elements). Since our analysis with molecular methods showed that these strains carry more characteristics of typical EPEC and lack the AggR regulon, we propose that they be classified as typical EPEC. Typical EPEC are recognized as pathogens, whereas atypical EAEC are not (3). In addition, the ability to simultaneously induce attaching/effacing lesions and biofilm production may increase the potential of these strains to cause diarrhea and prolong bacterial residence in the intestines, thus worsening malnutrition in the patient.



We thank Mônica A. Midolli Vieira for her assistance in the colony blot experiments.

This study was supported by grants from Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) (02/03900-8 and 04/11926-2) and Programa de Apoio a Núcleos de Excelência-PRONEX MCT/CNPq/FAPESP.


Dennys M. Girão*†, Valéria B.C. Girão*, Kinue Irino‡, and Tânia A. Tardelli Gomes§Comments to Author 
Author affiliations: *Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil; †Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; ‡Instituto Adolfo Lutz, São Paulo, Brazil; §Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil



  1. Kaper  JB, Nataro  JP, Mobley  HLT. Pathogenic Escherichia coli. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004;2:12340. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Trabulsi  LR, Keller  R, Gomes  TA. Typical and atypical enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:50813.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Nataro  JP. Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli pathogenesis. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2005;21:48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Vieira  MAM, Andrade  JRC, Trabulsi  LR, Rosa  ACP, Dias  AMG, Ramos  SRTS, Phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of Escherichia coli strains of non-enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC) serogroups that carry eae and lack the EPEC adherence factor and shiga toxin DNA probe sequences. J Infect Dis. 2001;183:76272. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Gomes  TAT, Irino  K, Girão  DM, Girão  VBC, Guth  BEC, Vaz  TMI, Emerging enteropathogenic Escherichia coli strains? Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:18515.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bouzari  S, Jafari  A, Farhoudi-Moghaddam  AA, Shokouhi  F, Parsi  M. Adherence of non-enteropathogenic Escherichia coli to HeLa cells. J Med Microbiol. 1994;40:957. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Monteiro-Neto  V, Bando  SY, Moreira-Filho  CA, Girón  JA. Characterization of an outer membrane protein associated with haemagglutination and adhesive properties of enteroaggregative Escherichia coli O111:H12. Cell Microbiol. 2003;5:53347. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Knutton  S, Baldwin  T, Williams  PH, McNeish  AS. Actin accumulation at sites of bacterial adhesion to tissue cultures cells: basis of a new diagnostic test for enteropathogenic and enterohaemorragic Escherichia coli. Infect Immun. 1989;57:12908.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Adu-Bobie  J, Frankel  G, Bain  C, Gonçalves  AG, Trabulsi  LR, Douce  G, Detection of intimin alpha, beta, gamma, and delta, four intimin derivatives expressed by attaching and effacing microbial pathogens. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:6628.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Carvalho  VM, Gyles  CL, Ziebell  K, Ribeiro  MA, Catão-Dias  JL, Sinhorini  IL, Characterization of monkey enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) and human typical and atypical EPEC serotype isolates from neotropical nonhuman primates. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:122534. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar




Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1208.051654

Related Links


Table of Contents – Volume 12, Number 8—August 2006

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.



Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Tânia A. Tardelli Gomes, Departamento de Microbiologia, Imunologia e Parasitologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina Rua Botucatu, 862, 3° andar Vila Clementino, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil CEP 04023-062

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.


Page created: December 09, 2011
Page updated: December 09, 2011
Page reviewed: December 09, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.