Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 13, Number 1—January 2007

Cryptococcus gattii Dispersal Mechanisms, British Columbia, Canada

Sarah E. Kidd*, Paxton J. Bach*, Adrian O. Hingston*, Sunny Mak†, Yat Chow*, Laura MacDougall†, James W. Kronstad*, and Karen H. Bartlett*Comments to Author 
Author affiliations: *University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada; †British Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;

Main Article

Table 2

Airborne Cryptococcus gattii concentration before and during contracted tree-cutting activities

Tree-cutting activitySampling methodC. gattii concentration in air (CFU/m3)
Red alderDouglas fir
Air; Andersen 6-stage*3812,073
Limb removalAir; Andersen 6-stage5,707940
Air; Andersen 6-stage3,6221,279
FellingAir; RCS-Plus,† 12–15 m above ground906294
Air; RCS-Plus, 12–15 m above ground881213
Cutting limbsAir; RCS-Plus, 6 m above ground7501,719
Air; RCS-Plus, 6 m above ground2,968
Cutting tree trunkAir; RCS-Plus, 0–3 m above ground21,250225
Wood chippingAir; RCS-Plus53,12521,250

*Limit of detection of method: 6 CFU/m3.
†RCS, Reuter centrifugal sampler; limit of detection of method: 5 CFU/m3.

Main Article

Page created: June 28, 2010
Page updated: June 28, 2010
Page reviewed: June 28, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.