Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 14, Number 3—March 2008

Rescinding Community Mitigation Strategies in an Influenza Pandemic

Victoria J. Davey*†Comments to Author  and Robert J. Glass‡
Author affiliations: *Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC, USA; †Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Maryland, USA‡Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA;

Main Article


Epidemic management targets

Outcome Target
No. epidemics*/1,070 simulations Fewer than unmitigated base cases
Infection rate <0.1 of population (n = 1,000)
Peak illness rate <0.01 of population (n = 100)
Average no. cycles required <2.0
Average days home per adult Fewer than continuation strategies
Average no. days strategies imposed Fewer than continuation strategies

*An epidemic is defined in the model as a simulation with a clinical illness rate >1% of the population.

Main Article

Page created: July 07, 2010
Page updated: July 07, 2010
Page reviewed: July 07, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.