Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 14, Number 7—July 2008
Letter

Duck Migration and Past Influenza A (H5N1) Outbreak Areas

Cite This Article

To the Editor: In 2005 and 2006, the highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) virus subtype H5N1 rapidly spread from Asia through Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. Waterbirds are considered the natural reservoir of low pathogenic avian influenza viruses (1), but their potential role in the spread of HPAI (H5N1), along with legal and illegal poultry and wildlife trade (2), is yet to be clarified.

The garganey (Anas querquedula) is the most numerous duck migrating between Eurasia and Africa: ≈2 million gather in the wetlands of Western Africa every northern winter (3). We report on a spatial correlation between the 2007 migration path of a garganey monitored through satellite telemetry and areas that had major HPAI (H5N1) outbreaks from 2005 through 2007.

Appendix Figure

Thumbnail of  A) Migration route of a garganey tracked with satellite telemetry from February through November 2007, and major highly pathogenic avian influenza (H5N1) outbreaks in domestic and wild birds over Europe, the Middle East, and Africa from July 2005 through November 2007. Close-up maps of stopover sites during the spring migration in (B) the Danube River delta in Romania (May 8-11, 2007), and (C) Lake Kus in Turkey (April 29-May 6, 2007).

Appendix Figure. A) Migration route of a garganey tracked with satellite telemetry from February through November 2007, and major highly pathogenic avian influenza (H5N1) outbreaks in domestic and wild birds over Europe,...

Seven garganeys were captured, sampled, and fitted with a 12-g satellite transmitter in northern Nigeria (Hadejia-Nguru Wetlands; 12°48′N; 10°44′E) in the period February 7–15, 2007. All cloacal and tracheal swabs tested negative for avian influenza virus by real-time reverse transcription–PCR analysis of the matrix gene. One second-year (>9-month-old) female garganey migrated from northern Nigeria to Russia in April–May 2007 (Appendix Figure), where she remained until the end of July. During this 6-week spring migration over the Sahara Desert, Mediterranean Sea, and Eastern Europe, this duck stopped at 3 main stopover sites in Crete, Turkey (Bosphorus region), and Romania (Danube River delta). The duck migrated back to the Danube delta in August, where it remained until November, when the signal was lost. Other garganeys we monitored stopped transmitting before initiating spring migration (n = 3) or remained in West Africa during spring and summer (n = 3), which suggests a stress linked to capture or constraint from the transmitter attachment.

This transcontinental migration path connects several areas of past major HPAI (H5N1) outbreaks (Appendix Figure). The wintering area in Nigeria where this duck was caught and remained for 8 weeks before spring migration is located where a large number of outbreaks have occurred repeatedly since February 2006 (the closest being 30 km away). This bird reached its breeding ground in Russia near Moscow and stayed for 2 months in an area that had several outbreaks in backyard poultry in February 2007 (the closest being 30 km away). Finally, the Danube delta, used as a resting ground for 3 months in late summer and autumn, is also an area with recurring outbreaks since October 2005 in wild and domestic birds, with the most recent case reported in November 2007 (the closest being 10 km away). The initial spread of HPAI virus (H5N1) from Eurasia to Africa occurred in autumn and winter 2005–06. The migratory movements we observed during spring and summer in this study were not temporally correlated with any reported HPAI (H5N1) outbreak, either in sequence or period; hence, they should not be interpreted as evidence of the role of wild bird in expansions of the virus.

During spring migration from Nigeria to Russia, the garganey stopped several days in wetlands situated close to areas of past outbreaks in the Danube delta (4 days at a distance of 1–4 km from October 2005 outbreaks) and Lake Kus, Turkey (8 days at a distance of 10–30 km from October 2005 outbreaks). The occurrence of past outbreaks indicates that the duck used wetlands favorable to HPAI virus (H5N1) transmission as stopover sites. The relatively long stopover periods enabled prolonged contact of migratory ducks with local domestic and wild bird populations or through shared water, thus prolonging the potential for virus transmission. Considering the persistence of infectivity of HPAI virus (H5N1) in aquatic habitats (4), the number of migratory ducks congregating at stopover sites from various geographic origins and destinations, and the asynchronous timing of the arrival and departure of migratory ducks (5), we believe that these sites may provide locations for disease transmission and possible spread upon movement of wild birds.

The satellite-fitted female garganey covered distances between stopover sites of >2,000 km in <2 days, traveling at an estimated speed of 60 km/h. This large-scale movement in a short period, coupled with experimental exposure trials demonstrating viral shedding of up to 4 days in ducks with no clinical signs of infection (6), is consistent with potential viral transmission over great distances.

These facts illustrate how a pathogen such as HPAI virus (H5N1) can potentially be transported rapidly by migratory birds across continents. However, the physiologic impact of an HPAI (H5N1) infection on the ability of birds to migrate long distances is still unknown (7) and to date, most empirical evidence suggests that wild birds have only moved short distances (a few hundred kilometers) likely carrying HPAI virus (H5N1) (8). Despite extensive global wildlife surveillance efforts and with the exception of a few reported cases of HPAI (H5N1) infection in apparently healthy wild ducks (9,10), evidence of wild bird involvement in the spread of HPAI virus (H5N1) over long distances is still lacking.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank the conservator-general of Nigerian National Parks for permission to capture birds for telemetry study in Nigeria, and ornithologists from the A.P. Leventis Ornithological Research Institute, the Ottenby Bird Observatory, Bird Studies Canada, and the Istituto Nazionale per la Fauna Selvatica. We also thank the Zoo of Lunaret (Montpellier, France) for allowing us to test the harness-attached transmitter on captive garganeys.

Financial support (OSRO/GLO/604/UK) for this project was provided by the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, represented by the Department for International Development.

Top

Nicolas Gaidet*Comments to Author , Scott H. Newman†, Ward Hagemeijer‡, Tim Dodman‡, Julien Cappelle*, Saliha Hammoumi*, Lorenzo De Simone†, and John Y. Takekawa§
Author affiliations: *Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement, Montpellier, France; †Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy; ‡Wetlands International, Wageningen, the Netherlands; §US Geological Survey, Vallejo, California, USA;

Top

References

  1. Olsen  B, Munster  VJ, Wallensten  A, Waldenstrom  J, Osterhaus  AD, Fouchier  RA. Global patterns of influenza a virus in wild birds. Science. 2006;312:3848. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Kilpatrick  AM, Chimura  AA, Gibbons  DW, Fleischer  RC, Marra  PP, Daszak  P. Predicting the global spread of H5N1 avian influenza. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:1936873. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Delany  S, Scott  D, eds. Waterbird population estimates. 4th ed. Wageningen (the Netherlands): Wetlands International; 2006.
  4. Brown  JD, Swayne  DE, Cooper  RJ, Burns  RE, Stallknecht  DE. Persistence of H5 and H7 avian influenza viruses in water. Avian Dis. 2007;51(Suppl):2859. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Guillemain  M, Fritz  H, Klaassen  M, Johnson  AR, Hafner  H. Fuelling rates of garganey (Anas querquedula) staging in the Camargue, southern France, during spring migration. J Ornithol. 2004;145:1528. DOIGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown  JD, Stallknecht  DE, Beck  JR, Suarez  DL, Swayne  DE. Susceptibility of North American ducks and gulls to H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:166370.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Weber  TP, Stilianakis  NI. Ecologic immunology of avian influenza (H5N1) in migratory birds. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:113943.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Watch  EMPRES. HPAI in Europe 2007: concurrent outbreaks in poultry and wild birds. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations; 2007 [cited 2007 Sep 12]. Available from www.fao.org/docs/eims/upload/231765/EW_Europe_aug07_ai.pdf
  9. Saad  MD, Ahmed  LS, Gamal-Eldein  MA, Fouda  MK, Khalil  FM, Yingst  SL. Possible avian influenza (H5N1) from migratory bird, Egypt. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:11201.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen  H, Li  KS, Wang  J, Fan  XH, Rayner  JM, Vijaykrishna  D, Establishment of multiple sublineages of H5N1 influenza virus in Asia: Implications for pandemic control. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:284550. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figure

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1407.071477

Related Links

Top

Table of Contents – Volume 14, Number 7—July 2008

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Nicolas Gaidet, Département Environnements et Sociétés, Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement, UR Gestion Intégrée de la Faune TA 30/E Campus International de Baillarguet, 34398 Montpellier, France;

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: July 12, 2010
Page updated: July 12, 2010
Page reviewed: July 12, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external